• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与美国疾病控制与预防中心冠状病毒自我检查工具的使用以及 2020 年 3 月 23 日至 2021 年 4 月 19 日向用户提供的指导:主题和趋势分析。

Engagement With the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Coronavirus Self-Checker and Guidance Provided to Users in the United States From March 23, 2020, to April 19, 2021: Thematic and Trend Analysis.

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Emergency Response, Atlanta, GA, United States.

General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, VA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 10;25:e39054. doi: 10.2196/39054.

DOI:10.2196/39054
PMID:36745776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039408/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2020, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States experienced surges in healthcare needs, which challenged capacity throughout the healthcare system. Stay-at-home orders in many jurisdictions, cancellation of elective procedures, and closures of outpatient medical offices disrupted patient access to care. To inform symptomatic persons about when to seek care and potentially help alleviate the burden on the healthcare system, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and partners developed the CDC Coronavirus Self-Checker ("Self-Checker"). This interactive tool assists individuals seeking information about COVID-19 to determine the appropriate level of care by asking demographic, clinical, and nonclinical questions during an online "conversation."

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes user characteristics, trends in use, and recommendations delivered by the Self-Checker between March 23, 2020, and April 19, 2021, for pursuing appropriate levels of medical care depending on the severity of user symptoms.

METHODS

User characteristics and trends in completed conversations that resulted in a care message were analyzed. Care messages delivered by the Self-Checker were manually classified into three overarching conversation themes: (1) seek care immediately; (2) take no action, or stay home and self-monitor; and (3) conversation redirected. Trends in 7-day averages of conversations and COVID-19 cases were examined with development and marketing milestones that potentially impacted Self-Checker user engagement.

RESULTS

Among 16,718,667 completed conversations, the Self-Checker delivered recommendations for 69.27% (n=11,580,738) of all conversations to "take no action, or stay home and self-monitor"; 28.8% (n=4,822,138) of conversations to "seek care immediately"; and 1.89% (n=315,791) of conversations were redirected to other resources without providing any care advice. Among 6.8 million conversations initiated for self-reported sick individuals without life-threatening symptoms, 59.21% resulted in a recommendation to "take no action, or stay home and self-monitor." Nearly all individuals (99.8%) who were not sick were also advised to "take no action, or stay home and self-monitor."

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of Self-Checker conversations resulted in advice to take no action, or stay home and self-monitor. This guidance may have reduced patient volume on the medical system; however, future studies evaluating patients' satisfaction, intention to follow the care advice received, course of action, and care modality pursued could clarify the impact of the Self-Checker and similar tools during future public health emergencies.

摘要

背景

2020 年,在 COVID-19 大流行开始时,美国的医疗需求激增,这对整个医疗系统的能力构成了挑战。许多司法管辖区的居家令、选择性手术的取消以及门诊医疗办公室的关闭,打乱了患者获得护理的机会。为了告知有症状的人何时寻求护理,并有可能帮助减轻医疗系统的负担,疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 和合作伙伴开发了 CDC 冠状病毒自我检查器(“自我检查器”)。这个互动工具通过在在线“对话”中询问人口统计学、临床和非临床问题,帮助寻求 COVID-19 信息的个人确定适当的护理水平。

目的

本研究描述了 2020 年 3 月 23 日至 2021 年 4 月 19 日期间,根据用户症状严重程度,自我检查器在建议采取适当医疗护理水平方面的用户特征、使用趋势和推荐情况。

方法

分析了完成对话的用户特征和趋势,这些对话导致了护理信息。自我检查器提供的护理信息由人工分为三个总体对话主题进行分类:(1)立即寻求护理;(2)无需采取行动,或留在家中并自我监测;(3)对话重定向。通过可能影响自我检查器用户参与度的开发和营销里程碑,研究了 7 天平均对话量和 COVID-19 病例的趋势。

结果

在 16718667 次完成的对话中,自我检查器为 69.27%(n=11580738)的所有对话提供了建议,即“无需采取行动,或留在家中并自我监测”;28.8%(n=4822138)的对话建议“立即寻求护理”;1.89%(n=315791)的对话被重新定向到其他资源,而没有提供任何护理建议。在为自我报告有症状但无生命威胁的个体发起的 680 万次对话中,59.21%的对话建议“无需采取行动,或留在家中并自我监测”。几乎所有未生病的个体(99.8%)也被建议“无需采取行动,或留在家中并自我监测”。

结论

大多数自我检查器对话的结果是建议无需采取行动,或留在家中并自我监测。这一指导可能减少了医疗系统的患者量;然而,未来评估患者满意度、遵循所收到护理建议的意愿、行动过程和所寻求的护理模式的研究,可以阐明自我检查器和类似工具在未来公共卫生紧急事件中的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/10039408/a507da0b993d/jmir_v25i1e39054_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/10039408/aedbcfdd7f52/jmir_v25i1e39054_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/10039408/a507da0b993d/jmir_v25i1e39054_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/10039408/aedbcfdd7f52/jmir_v25i1e39054_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/10039408/a507da0b993d/jmir_v25i1e39054_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Engagement With the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Coronavirus Self-Checker and Guidance Provided to Users in the United States From March 23, 2020, to April 19, 2021: Thematic and Trend Analysis.参与美国疾病控制与预防中心冠状病毒自我检查工具的使用以及 2020 年 3 月 23 日至 2021 年 4 月 19 日向用户提供的指导:主题和趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 10;25:e39054. doi: 10.2196/39054.
2
Patient Experience and Feedback After Using an Electronic Health Record-Integrated COVID-19 Symptom Checker: Survey Study.使用集成电子健康记录的 COVID-19 症状检查器后的患者体验与反馈:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 13;9(3):e40064. doi: 10.2196/40064.
3
Use Characteristics and Triage Acuity of a Digital Symptom Checker in a Large Integrated Health System: Population-Based Descriptive Study.大型综合医疗系统中数字症状检查器的使用特征与分诊 acuity:基于人群的描述性研究。 (注:这里“acuity”可能是特定语境下的专业术语,直接保留英文以便准确传达原文信息,具体含义需结合专业领域进一步理解。)
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 30;22(11):e20549. doi: 10.2196/20549.
4
Health Information Seeking From an Intelligent Web-Based Symptom Checker: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.健康信息智能网络症状检查器搜索:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 19;24(8):e36322. doi: 10.2196/36322.
5
User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Validation Study.使用电子症状检查器进行用户发起的症状评估:一项混合方法验证研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 19;12:e41423. doi: 10.2196/41423.
6
Potential Indirect Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Use of Emergency Departments for Acute Life-Threatening Conditions - United States, January-May 2020.2020 年 1 月至 5 月美国因 COVID-19 大流行对急诊部门用于急性危及生命病症的潜在间接影响。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 26;69(25):795-800. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6925e2.
7
A multinational survey of patient utilization of and value conveyed through virtual symptom triage and healthcare referral.一项关于患者利用虚拟症状分诊和医疗转介以及所传达价值的多国调查。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;10:1047291. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1047291. eCollection 2022.
8
Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2016.疟疾监测 - 美国,2016 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 May 17;68(5):1-35. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6805a1.
9
Effects of User-Reported Risk Factors and Follow-Up Care Activities on Satisfaction With a COVID-19 Chatbot: Cross-Sectional Study.用户报告的风险因素和随访护理活动对 COVID-19 聊天机器人满意度的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Dec 14;11:e43105. doi: 10.2196/43105.
10
Correlating global trends in COVID-19 cases with online symptom checker self-assessments.将全球 COVID-19 病例趋势与在线症状检查器自我评估相关联。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0281709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281709. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Chatbots and COVID-19: Taking Stock of the Lessons Learned.聊天机器人与 COVID-19:总结经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 21;26:e54840. doi: 10.2196/54840.

本文引用的文献

1
How accurate are digital symptom assessment apps for suggesting conditions and urgency advice? A clinical vignettes comparison to GPs.数字症状评估应用程序在提示病症和紧急程度建议方面的准确性如何?与全科医生进行临床病例比较。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 16;10(12):e040269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040269.
2
Online forward triage during the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间的在线前分诊。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Feb;38(2):106-108. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209792. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Implementation of a Self-Triage Web Application for Suspected COVID-19 and Its Impact on Emergency Call Centers: Observational Study.
用于疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎的自我分诊网络应用程序的实施及其对紧急呼叫中心的影响:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 23;22(11):e22924. doi: 10.2196/22924.
4
CDC's Flu on Call Simulation: Testing a National Helpline for Use During an Influenza Pandemic.美国疾病控制与预防中心的流感咨询电话模拟演练:在流感大流行期间测试全国热线的使用情况。
Health Secur. 2020 Sep/Oct;18(5):392-402. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0152.
5
The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia.澳大利亚免费在线症状检查器和应用程序提供的诊断和分诊建议的质量。
Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(11):514-519. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50600. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review.用于紧急健康问题的数字和在线症状检查器以及健康评估/分诊服务:系统评价
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e027743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743.
7
Self-triage for acute primary care via a smartphone application: Practical, safe and efficient?智能手机应用程序进行急性初级保健的自我分诊:实用、安全且高效吗?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199284. eCollection 2018.
8
Feasibility of web-based self-triage by parents of children with influenza-like illness: a cautionary tale.基于网络的流感样疾病患儿家长自我分诊的可行性:一个警示故事。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Feb;167(2):112-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1573.