• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型综合医疗系统中数字症状检查器的使用特征与分诊 acuity:基于人群的描述性研究。 (注:这里“acuity”可能是特定语境下的专业术语,直接保留英文以便准确传达原文信息,具体含义需结合专业领域进一步理解。)

Use Characteristics and Triage Acuity of a Digital Symptom Checker in a Large Integrated Health System: Population-Based Descriptive Study.

作者信息

Morse Keith E, Ostberg Nicolai P, Jones Veena G, Chan Albert S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 30;22(11):e20549. doi: 10.2196/20549.

DOI:10.2196/20549
PMID:33170799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7717918/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure on the US health care system has been increasing due to a combination of aging populations, rising health care expenditures, and most recently, the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses to this pressure are hindered in part by reliance on a limited supply of highly trained health care professionals, creating a need for scalable technological solutions. Digital symptom checkers are artificial intelligence-supported software tools that use a conversational "chatbot" format to support rapid diagnosis and consistent triage. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought new attention to these tools due to the need to avoid face-to-face contact and preserve urgent care capacity. However, evidence-based deployment of these chatbots requires an understanding of user demographics and associated triage recommendations generated by a large general population.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluate the user demographics and levels of triage acuity provided by a symptom checker chatbot deployed in partnership with a large integrated health system in the United States.

METHODS

This population-based descriptive study included all web-based symptom assessments completed on the website and patient portal of the Sutter Health system (24 hospitals in Northern California) from April 24, 2019, to February 1, 2020. User demographics were compared to relevant US Census population data.

RESULTS

A total of 26,646 symptom assessments were completed during the study period. Most assessments (17,816/26,646, 66.9%) were completed by female users. The mean user age was 34.3 years (SD 14.4 years), compared to a median age of 37.3 years of the general population. The most common initial symptom was abdominal pain (2060/26,646, 7.7%). A substantial number of assessments (12,357/26,646, 46.4%) were completed outside of typical physician office hours. Most users were advised to seek medical care on the same day (7299/26,646, 27.4%) or within 2-3 days (6301/26,646, 23.6%). Over a quarter of the assessments indicated a high degree of urgency (7723/26,646, 29.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Users of the symptom checker chatbot were broadly representative of our patient population, although they skewed toward younger and female users. The triage recommendations were comparable to those of nurse-staffed telephone triage lines. Although the emergence of COVID-19 has increased the interest in remote medical assessment tools, it is important to take an evidence-based approach to their deployment.

摘要

背景

由于人口老龄化、医疗保健支出不断增加,以及最近的新冠疫情,美国医疗保健系统面临的压力一直在增大。对这一压力的应对措施在一定程度上受到依赖数量有限的训练有素的医疗保健专业人员的阻碍,因此需要可扩展的技术解决方案。数字症状检查器是人工智能支持的软件工具,采用对话式“聊天机器人”格式来支持快速诊断和一致的分诊。由于需要避免面对面接触并保留紧急护理能力,新冠疫情使这些工具受到了新的关注。然而,基于证据部署这些聊天机器人需要了解用户人口统计学特征以及广大普通人群生成的相关分诊建议。

目的

在本研究中,我们评估了与美国一家大型综合医疗系统合作部署的症状检查器聊天机器人提供的用户人口统计学特征和分诊敏锐度水平。

方法

这项基于人群的描述性研究包括2019年4月24日至2020年2月1日在萨特健康系统(加利福尼亚州北部的24家医院)的网站和患者门户网站上完成的所有基于网络的症状评估。将用户人口统计学特征与美国人口普查相关人口数据进行比较。

结果

在研究期间共完成了26646次症状评估。大多数评估(17816/26646,66.9%)由女性用户完成。用户平均年龄为34.3岁(标准差14.4岁),而普通人群的年龄中位数为37.3岁。最常见的初始症状是腹痛(2060/26646,7.7%)。相当数量的评估(12357/26646,46.4%)是在非典型医生办公时间完成的。大多数用户被建议在当天(7299/26646,27.4%)或2至3天内(6301/26646,23.6%)寻求医疗护理。超过四分之一的评估表明紧急程度很高(7723/26646,29.0%)。

结论

症状检查器聊天机器人的用户在很大程度上代表了我们的患者群体,尽管他们偏向于年轻和女性用户。分诊建议与护士值守的电话分诊热线相当。尽管新冠疫情的出现增加了对远程医疗评估工具的兴趣,但以基于证据的方法来部署这些工具很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab4/7717918/e0a690869e62/jmir_v22i11e20549_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab4/7717918/e0a690869e62/jmir_v22i11e20549_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab4/7717918/e0a690869e62/jmir_v22i11e20549_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Use Characteristics and Triage Acuity of a Digital Symptom Checker in a Large Integrated Health System: Population-Based Descriptive Study.大型综合医疗系统中数字症状检查器的使用特征与分诊 acuity:基于人群的描述性研究。 (注:这里“acuity”可能是特定语境下的专业术语,直接保留英文以便准确传达原文信息,具体含义需结合专业领域进一步理解。)
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 30;22(11):e20549. doi: 10.2196/20549.
2
Patient Experience and Feedback After Using an Electronic Health Record-Integrated COVID-19 Symptom Checker: Survey Study.使用集成电子健康记录的 COVID-19 症状检查器后的患者体验与反馈:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 13;9(3):e40064. doi: 10.2196/40064.
3
Young Adults' Perspectives on the Use of Symptom Checkers for Self-Triage and Self-Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.年轻人对使用症状检查器进行自我分诊和自我诊断的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 6;7(1):e22637. doi: 10.2196/22637.
4
Triage and Diagnostic Accuracy of Online Symptom Checkers: Systematic Review.在线症状检查器的分诊和诊断准确性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e43803. doi: 10.2196/43803.
5
How Does Triage by an Electronic Symptom Checker Match with Triage by a Nurse?电子症状检查器分诊与护士分诊如何匹配?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:571-572. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220528.
6
Evaluation of Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy and Usability of a Symptom Checker in an Emergency Department: Observational Study.在急诊科评估诊断和分诊准确性及症状检查器的可用性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Sep 19;10(9):e38364. doi: 10.2196/38364.
7
Triage Accuracy and the Safety of User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker in a Real-Life Setting: Instrument Validation Study.在真实环境中,使用电子症状检查器进行用户发起的症状评估的分诊准确性和安全性:仪器验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 26;11:e55099. doi: 10.2196/55099.
8
Utilization patterns and efficiency gains from use of a fully EHR-integrated COVID-19 self-triage and self-scheduling tool: a retrospective analysis.充分利用 EHR 集成的 COVID-19 自我分诊和自我预约工具的利用模式和效率提升:回顾性分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2066-2074. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac161.
9
Characteristics and Symptoms of App Users Seeking COVID-19-Related Digital Health Information and Remote Services: Retrospective Cohort Study.寻求新冠病毒相关数字健康信息和远程服务的应用程序用户的特征与症状:回顾性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 20;22(10):e23197. doi: 10.2196/23197.
10
Effects of User-Reported Risk Factors and Follow-Up Care Activities on Satisfaction With a COVID-19 Chatbot: Cross-Sectional Study.用户报告的风险因素和随访护理活动对 COVID-19 聊天机器人满意度的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Dec 14;11:e43105. doi: 10.2196/43105.

引用本文的文献

1
LLM enabled classification of patient self-reported symptoms and needs in health systems across the USA.基于大语言模型对美国各地卫生系统中患者自我报告的症状和需求进行分类。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 1;8(1):390. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01779-9.
2
Patients' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Acceptance, Challenges, and Use in Medical Care: Qualitative Study.患者对人工智能在医疗保健中的接受度、挑战及应用的认知:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 15;27:e70487. doi: 10.2196/70487.
3
Impact of a Symptom Checker App on Patient-Physician Interaction Among Self-Referred Walk-In Patients in the Emergency Department: Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
A Guide to Chatbots for COVID-19 Screening at Pediatric Health Care Facilities.儿科医疗机构 COVID-19 筛查用聊天机器人指南
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 30;6(2):e18808. doi: 10.2196/18808.
2
Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者对人工智能辅助症状检查器有用性的看法:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 30;22(1):e14679. doi: 10.2196/14679.
3
Association of Use of Online Symptom Checkers With Patients' Plans for Seeking Care.
症状检查应用程序对急诊科自行前来就诊患者中患者与医生互动的影响:多中心、平行组、随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 2;27:e64028. doi: 10.2196/64028.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care - Patients' Perceptions on Caregiving Relationships and Ethics: A Qualitative Study.医疗保健中的人工智能——患者对护理关系和伦理的看法:一项定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70216. doi: 10.1111/hex.70216.
5
Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.绘制并总结用于自动采集病史和分诊的人工智能系统的研究:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 6;27:e53741. doi: 10.2196/53741.
6
The role of artificial intelligence in pandemic responses: from epidemiological modeling to vaccine development.人工智能在大流行应对中的作用:从流行病学建模到疫苗研发。
Mol Biomed. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s43556-024-00238-3.
7
The RepVig framework for designing use-case specific representative vignettes and evaluating triage accuracy of laypeople and symptom assessment applications.用于设计特定用例代表性案例并评估非专业人员和症状评估应用程序分诊准确性的RepVig框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 23;14(1):30614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83844-z.
8
Considerations for emergency department virtual triage.急诊科虚拟分诊的注意事项。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Mar;38(2):108-113. doi: 10.1177/08404704241298643. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
9
Triage Accuracy and the Safety of User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker in a Real-Life Setting: Instrument Validation Study.在真实环境中,使用电子症状检查器进行用户发起的症状评估的分诊准确性和安全性:仪器验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 26;11:e55099. doi: 10.2196/55099.
10
Improving Triage Accuracy in Prehospital Emergency Telemedicine: Scoping Review of Machine Learning-Enhanced Approaches.提高院前急救远程医疗中的分诊准确性:机器学习增强方法的范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Sep 11;13:e56729. doi: 10.2196/56729.
在线症状检查器的使用与患者寻求医疗服务的计划的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18561.
4
The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review.医疗保健中对话代理的个性化:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 7;21(11):e15360. doi: 10.2196/15360.
5
Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review.用于紧急健康问题的数字和在线症状检查器以及健康评估/分诊服务:系统评价
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e027743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743.
6
Equity in the Age of Health Care Information Technology and Innovation: Addressing the Digital Divide.医疗保健信息技术与创新时代的公平性:应对数字鸿沟
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S106-S107. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001033.
7
The Use of Artificially Intelligent Self-Diagnosing Digital Platforms by the General Public: Scoping Review.公众对人工智能自我诊断数字平台的使用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 May 1;7(2):e13445. doi: 10.2196/13445.
8
Factors Associated With Increases in US Health Care Spending, 1996-2013.1996 - 2013年美国医疗保健支出增加的相关因素
JAMA. 2017 Nov 7;318(17):1668-1678. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15927.
9
Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study.用于自我诊断和分诊的症状检查器评估:审计研究
BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3480. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3480.
10
Evaluating patient compliance with nurse advice line recommendations and the impact on healthcare costs.评估患者对护士咨询热线建议的依从性及其对医疗成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Aug;10(8):534-42.