• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据韩国不同地区剥夺指数评估自杀意念的影响因素

Factors Influencing Suicidal Ideation According to the Deprivation Indices of Different Regions in Korea.

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.

出版信息

J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Jan;56(1):88-94. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.356. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

DOI:10.3961/jpmph.22.356
PMID:36746426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9925278/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined how deprivation differed by region and the effect those differences had on suicidal ideation among the local population.

METHODS

Data collected over 10 years (2012-2021) in the Korea Welfare Panel Study were organized into 3 categories: metropolitan, city, and rural. A panel analysis was conducted on the impact of deprivation indices, socio-demographic characteristics, and life satisfaction on suicidal ideation in each category.

RESULTS

Income, divorce status, family relationship satisfaction, and medical deprivation had a significant impact on suicidal ideation in metropolitan areas, whereas these variables did not have significant effects in rural areas. In other words, income, family, and medical support were more impactful in city areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the deprivation index was higher in rural areas than in city areas due to an aging population and reduced income levels, the mental health of rural residents was found to be generally better than that of city residents. The possibility that this is related to the strength of relationships within the respective communities should be considered in light of recent discussions on relational welfare.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了贫困程度在不同地区的差异,以及这些差异对当地居民自杀意念的影响。

方法

本研究使用韩国福利纵向调查(Korea Welfare Panel Study)在 2012 年至 2021 年期间收集的数据,将其分为大都市、城市和农村三类。在每一类中,采用面板分析方法研究贫困指数、社会人口特征和生活满意度对自杀意念的影响。

结果

在大都市地区,收入、离婚状况、家庭关系满意度和医疗贫困对自杀意念有显著影响,而在农村地区这些变量没有显著影响。换句话说,在城市地区,收入、家庭和医疗支持的影响更大。

结论

尽管由于人口老龄化和收入水平下降,农村地区的贫困指数高于城市地区,但农村居民的心理健康状况普遍好于城市居民。考虑到最近关于关系福利的讨论,应该考虑到这种情况与各自社区内关系强弱的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9925278/f07a64917bf1/jpmph-22-356f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9925278/f07a64917bf1/jpmph-22-356f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9925278/f07a64917bf1/jpmph-22-356f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing Suicidal Ideation According to the Deprivation Indices of Different Regions in Korea.根据韩国不同地区剥夺指数评估自杀意念的影响因素
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Jan;56(1):88-94. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.356. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Individual and regional factors associated with suicidal ideation among Korean elderly: a multilevel analysis of the Korea Community Health Survey.个体和地区因素与韩国老年人自杀意念的关系:一项基于韩国社区健康调查的多层次分析。
Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019022. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019022. Epub 2019 May 26.
3
Household income changes and suicidal ideation in South Korea: Findings from a longitudinal study.韩国家庭收入变化与自杀意念:一项纵向研究的结果。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Aug;51(4):795-806. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12748. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
4
Determinants of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts: parallel cross-sectional analyses examining geographical location.自杀意念和自杀未遂的决定因素:考察地理位置的平行横断面分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 23;14:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-208.
5
Differential association of socio-economic status with gender- and age-defined suicidal ideation among adult and elderly individuals in South Korea.韩国成年和老年人群中,社会经济地位与性别和年龄定义的自杀意念的关联存在差异。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Nov 30;210(1):323-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Multilevel Effect of Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Characteristics on Suicidal Ideation Among Korean Older Adults.社区社会凝聚力和特征对韩国老年人自杀意念的多层次影响
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Apr;57(3):522-528. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00678-5. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
The temporal association of excessive health expenditure with suicidal ideation among primary income earners: a cross-sectional design using the Korean Welfare Panel Survey (KoWePS).主要收入者中过度医疗支出与自杀意念的时间关联:一项使用韩国福利面板调查(KoWePS)的横断面设计。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 16;5(6):e007421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007421.
8
A cross-sectional study on risk factors and their interactions with suicidal ideation among the elderly in rural communities of Hunan, China.中国湖南农村社区老年人自杀意念的危险因素及其相互作用的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 15;6(4):e010914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010914.
9
Low socioeconomic status and suicidal ideation among elderly individuals.老年人的低社会经济地位与自杀意念
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Dec;28(12):2055-2066. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001149. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
Childhood adversity predicted suicidal ideation in older age: Results from a National Survey in Korea.童年逆境预示着老年期出现自杀意念:来自韩国全国性调查的结果。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Jul;24(7):1141-1148. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1616161. Epub 2019 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors of Capital on Depression in Older Adulthood: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Regions in Korea.老年期抑郁症的资本因素:韩国城乡地区比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 29;11(21):2850. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212850.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial hardship and suicide ideation: Age and gender difference in a Korean panel study.经济困难与自杀意念:韩国面板研究中的年龄和性别差异。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:889-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.102. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
2
Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.逻辑斯蒂回归还是线性回归?使用回归分析估计二分类结局的实验处理的因果效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):700-709. doi: 10.1037/xge0000920. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
3
Anxiety and depression in the Republic of Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic.
爱尔兰共和国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的焦虑和抑郁情况。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Sep;142(3):249-256. doi: 10.1111/acps.13219. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
4
Risk factors for suicide in individuals with depression: a systematic review.抑郁症患者自杀的风险因素:系统综述。
J Affect Disord. 2013 May;147(1-3):17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
5
The problems of relative deprivation: why some societies do better than others.相对剥夺问题:为何有些社会比其他社会表现更好。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1965-78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.041. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
6
NZiDep: a New Zealand index of socioeconomic deprivation for individuals.NZiDep:新西兰个人社会经济剥夺指数
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1474-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.008. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
7
Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: a response to Lynch et al.收入与健康关系中的社会心理和物质途径:对林奇等人的回应
BMJ. 2001 May 19;322(7296):1233-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1233.
8
Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development.平凡的魔力。发展中的复原力过程。
Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):227-38. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.227.
9
Clinical epidemiology of suicide.自杀的临床流行病学
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;48 Suppl:33-8.