• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[跨学科肢体委员会在复杂损伤治疗中的作用]

[Interdisciplinary extremity board in the treatment of complex injuries].

作者信息

Pacha T Omar, Mommsen P, Brauckmann V, Aktas G, Krempec M, Wilhelmi B, Clausen J-D, März V, Krezdorn N, Vogt P M, Sehmisch S, Hinrichs J B, Ernst J

机构信息

Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.

Klinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

出版信息

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;126(3):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01290-4. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00113-023-01290-4
PMID:36746799
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interdisciplinary case conferences are well-established in the field of oncology in order to provide the best possible treatment for patients with complex disease patterns which overlap several disciplines.

METHODS

After studying the available literature the aims, indications, frequency, patient enrolment and documentation modalities, disciplines necessary to create the reconstruction plan and evaluation parameters of the board, were agreed in an interdisciplinary discussion among colleagues. The utilization of the extremity board and demographic features of the cases presented in the extremity board within the first 6 months were subsequently descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

The agreed primary aim of an extremity board is the timely and transparent preparation of a high-quality holistic reconstruction plan for optimized treatment of a challenging patient collective with complex injuries of the extremities. Decisive interfaces of an extremity board are the participation of interdisciplinary disciplines, established enrolment and documentation modalities and a longitudinal analysis of parameters of the acute medical treatment, the long-term function and quality of life of those affected. The patient collective so far mostly includes men under 40 years old with traumatic soft tissue defects and combined injuries. On average, reconstruction plans for 1-2 patients were approved in an interdisciplinary team per session.

CONCLUSION

The extremity board serves as a platform for coordinated planning of treatment for patients with complex injuries. The limited personnel and time resources represent the greatest challenge for the successful implementation. The extremity board enables a high degree of interdisciplinary networking. The digital registration and documentation modality within the internal hospital documentation system is of utmost relevance. The preparation of the reconstruction plan is of decisive importance for the qualitative success of treatment and the restoration of function. The longitudinal analysis of appropriate parameters is imperative to measure the quality of treatment.

摘要

背景

跨学科病例讨论会在肿瘤学领域已得到广泛应用,旨在为患有涉及多个学科的复杂疾病模式的患者提供尽可能最佳的治疗。

方法

在研究现有文献后,同事间进行了跨学科讨论,就目标、适应症、频率、患者纳入标准和记录方式、制定重建计划所需的学科以及委员会的评估参数达成了一致。随后对前6个月内四肢病例讨论板的使用情况以及四肢病例讨论板中所呈现病例的人口统计学特征进行了描述性分析。

结果

四肢病例讨论板的既定主要目标是及时、透明地制定高质量的整体重建计划,以优化治疗患有复杂四肢损伤的具有挑战性的患者群体。四肢病例讨论板的关键接口包括跨学科的参与、既定的纳入标准和记录方式,以及对急性医疗治疗参数、受影响者的长期功能和生活质量的纵向分析。到目前为止,患者群体大多包括40岁以下患有创伤性软组织缺损和复合伤的男性。每次会议中,跨学科团队平均批准1 - 2名患者的重建计划。

结论

四肢病例讨论板是为复杂损伤患者协调治疗计划的平台。有限的人员和时间资源是成功实施的最大挑战。四肢病例讨论板实现了高度的跨学科协作。医院内部文档系统中的数字注册和记录方式至关重要。重建计划的制定对治疗的质量成功和功能恢复起着决定性作用。对适当参数进行纵向分析对于衡量治疗质量至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Interdisciplinary extremity board in the treatment of complex injuries].[跨学科肢体委员会在复杂损伤治疗中的作用]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;126(3):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01290-4. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
[Interdisciplinarity in reconstructive surgery of the extremities].[肢体重建手术中的跨学科性]
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Sep;107(9):732-43. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0844-5.
3
[Reconstruction of lower limbs in old age-an interdisciplinary approach : Geriatric assessment, perioperative management, diagnostics and treatment targets].老年下肢重建——一种跨学科方法:老年评估、围手术期管理、诊断与治疗目标
Chirurg. 2019 Oct;90(10):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-01022-8.
4
[Reconstruction of lower limbs in old age-an interdisciplinary approach : Strategies for trauma surgery, vascular surgery and plastic surgery].老年下肢重建——一种跨学科方法:创伤外科、血管外科和整形外科的策略
Chirurg. 2019 Oct;90(10):806-815. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-01023-7.
5
[Fractures of the extremities with severe open soft tissue damage. Initial management and reconstructive treatment strategies].[伴有严重开放性软组织损伤的四肢骨折。初始处理及重建治疗策略]
Unfallchirurg. 2010 Aug;113(8):647-70; quiz 671-2. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1801-0.
6
[Systematic planning of surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities].[四肢软组织肉瘤手术的系统规划]
Chirurg. 2019 Jun;90(6):441-446. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-0921-5.
7
[Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the lower extremities].[下肢软组织缺损的重建]
Unfallchirurg. 2021 Oct;124(10):782-788. doi: 10.1007/s00113-021-01069-5. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
[Plastic and reconstructive surgery and orthopaedics interdisciplinary cooperation in the management of extremity injuries. Review].[整形与重建外科和骨科在肢体损伤管理中的跨学科合作。综述]
Rozhl Chir. 2008 Jun;87(6):322-7.
9
10
Principles of Orthoplastic Surgery for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Why Is This Important?下肢重建的整形骨科手术原则:为何这很重要?
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Jan;37(1):42-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695753. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
[Secondary defect coverage and functional reconstruction].[继发性缺损覆盖与功能重建]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;127(8):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01451-z. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
2
[Reconstruction options for infection-related defects : Plastic surgery armamentarium].[感染相关缺损的重建选择:整形手术器械库]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;127(8):567-572. doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01439-9. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Bone Regeneration Induced by Patient-Adapted Mg Alloy-Based Scaffolds for Bone Defects: Present and Future Perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Acute and Traumatic Wounds With Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Time.经灌洗和驻留时间的负压伤口治疗处理急性和创伤性伤口的管理。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;147(1S-1):43S-53S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007610.
2
[The interdisciplinary Microsurgeon - Results of the Consensus Workshop of the German Speaking Society for Microsurgery of Peripheral Nerves and Vessels].[跨学科显微外科医生——德语区外周神经与血管显微外科学会共识研讨会成果]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2019 Aug;51(4):295-301. doi: 10.1055/a-0874-2159. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
The mangled extremity score and amputation: Time for a revision.
患者适配的镁合金基骨缺损支架诱导的骨再生:现状与未来展望
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Dec 17;8(8):618. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8080618.
4
The Concept of Scaffold-Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Long Bone Defects: Current Clinical Application and Future Perspective.用于治疗长骨缺损的支架引导骨再生概念:当前临床应用及未来展望
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jun 27;14(7):341. doi: 10.3390/jfb14070341.
严重肢体损伤评分与截肢:修订时机
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Mar;82(3):518-523. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001339.
4
Update on the definition of polytrauma.多发伤定义的更新。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Apr;40(2):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0391-x. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
5
Primary amputation vs limb salvage in mangled extremity: a systematic review of the current scoring system.严重毁损肢体的一期截肢与保肢治疗:当前评分系统的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 2;16:372. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0832-7.
6
The definition of polytrauma revisited: An international consensus process and proposal of the new 'Berlin definition'.再探多发伤的定义:一项国际共识进程及新“柏林定义”提案
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Nov;77(5):780-786. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000453.
7
Mangled lower extremity: can we trust the amputation scores?下肢严重毁损:我们能信赖截肢评分吗?
Int J Burns Trauma. 2012;2(1):51-8. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
8
Complications following limb-threatening lower extremity trauma.下肢严重创伤后的并发症。
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jan;23(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818e43dd.
9
The interdisciplinary team and polytrauma rehabilitation: prescription for partnership.跨学科团队与多发伤康复:合作的良方。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):179-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.774.
10
Evaluation and outcome of patients after polytrauma--can patients be recruited for long-term follow-up?多发伤患者的评估与预后——患者能否被纳入长期随访?
Injury. 2006 Dec;37(12):1197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.032. Epub 2006 Nov 7.