Suppr超能文献

唾液巨噬细胞趋化因子可作为牙龈炎的潜在生物标志物。

Salivary macrophage chemokines as potential biomarkers of gingivitis.

机构信息

Master of Dental Surgery in Periodontics, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.

Wound Healing and Oral Diagnostic Research Group-Sharjah Institute of Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02787-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to analyze the salivary levels of macrophage-activating factor (MAF), macrophage-chemotactic factor (MCF), and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in healthy and gingivitis patients, and to correlate between the concentrations of these chemo attractants with the intensity of gingival inflammation clinically.

METHODS

Sixty saliva specimens were collected from periodontally healthy (n = 30), and gingivitis patients (n = 30). Bleeding on probing (BOP), Visible Plaque Index (VPI), and Simplified Modified Gingival Index (SMGI) were recorded through clinical examination. Salivary MAF, MCF, and MIF concentrations were assayed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 28). Total mean score for each biomarker was determined, and descriptive bivariate statistics were conducted to characterize the levels of biomarkers among the study groups. The difference in the biomarker levels among the study groups were analyzed by independent sample t test and one-way ANOVA. The diagnostic ability of the biomarkers was further tested by ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Salivary levels of MAF was not significantly different between periodontally healthy individuals and gingivitis patients. The difference in MCF and MIF levels between patients with gingivitis and those with healthy periodontium was statistically significant (p 0.05 and p 0.001, respectively). When examined across the various stages of disease progression, MIF showed statistically significant difference among the three biomarkers (p 0.05). ROC curve analysis further revealed that area under the curve (AUC) for MIF has a better diagnostic capacity than MCF (AUC 0.981 vs. 0.673).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that MIF could be considered as a potential salivary biomarker for gingivitis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析健康者和牙龈炎患者的唾液巨噬细胞激活因子(MAF)、巨噬细胞趋化因子(MCF)和巨噬细胞移动抑制因子(MIF)水平,并将这些趋化因子的浓度与临床牙龈炎症强度相关联。

方法

从牙周健康者(n=30)和牙龈炎患者(n=30)中收集 60 份唾液样本。通过临床检查记录探诊出血(BOP)、可见菌斑指数(VPI)和简化改良牙龈指数(SMGI)。使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)测定唾液 MAF、MCF 和 MIF 浓度。使用 SPSS(版本 28)进行统计分析。确定每个生物标志物的总平均值,并进行描述性双变量统计,以描述研究组中生物标志物的水平。通过独立样本 t 检验和单因素方差分析分析研究组之间生物标志物水平的差异。进一步通过 ROC 曲线分析测试生物标志物的诊断能力。

结果

牙周健康者和牙龈炎患者的唾液 MAF 水平无显著差异。牙龈炎患者和牙周健康者的 MCF 和 MIF 水平差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05 和 p<0.001)。当检查疾病进展的各个阶段时,MIF 在三种生物标志物之间表现出统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。ROC 曲线分析进一步表明,MIF 的曲线下面积(AUC)比 MCF 具有更好的诊断能力(AUC 0.981 与 0.673)。

结论

我们的结果表明,MIF 可以被认为是牙龈炎的潜在唾液生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e404/9903476/acf8a1a18c16/12903_2023_2787_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验