• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理化网络中对 NLP 生成语言和人类生成语言差异的内隐感知。

Implicit Perception of Differences between NLP-Produced and Human-Produced Language in the Mentalizing Network.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Humanities & Social Science, University of Science & Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, China.

Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, School of Life Science, Division of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science & Technology of China, Hefei, 230027, China.

出版信息

Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Apr;10(12):e2203990. doi: 10.1002/advs.202203990. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1002/advs.202203990
PMID:36748300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131862/
Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) is central to the communication with machines and among ourselves, and NLP research field has long sought to produce human-quality language. Identification of informative criteria for measuring NLP-produced language quality will support development of ever-better NLP tools. The authors hypothesize that mentalizing network neural activity may be used to distinguish NLP-produced language from human-produced language, even for cases where human judges cannot subjectively distinguish the language source. Using the social chatbots Google Meena in English and Microsoft XiaoIce in Chinese to generate NLP-produced language, behavioral tests which reveal that variance of personality perceived from chatbot chats is larger than for human chats are conducted, suggesting that chatbot language usage patterns are not stable. Using an identity rating task with functional magnetic resonance imaging, neuroimaging analyses which reveal distinct patterns of brain activity in the mentalizing network including the DMPFC and rTPJ in response to chatbot versus human chats that cannot be distinguished subjectively are conducted. This study illustrates a promising empirical basis for measuring the quality of NLP-produced language: adding a judge's implicit perception as an additional criterion.

摘要

自然语言处理(NLP)是人机交流和人际交流的核心,NLP 研究领域长期以来一直致力于生成具有人类质量的语言。确定用于衡量 NLP 生成语言质量的信息标准将支持不断开发更好的 NLP 工具。作者假设,心理化网络的神经活动可用于区分 NLP 生成的语言和人类生成的语言,即使对于人类评判者无法主观区分语言来源的情况也是如此。使用英语的社交聊天机器人 Google Meena 和中文的 Microsoft XiaoIce 生成 NLP 生成的语言,进行行为测试,揭示从聊天机器人聊天中感知到的人格方差大于人类聊天,这表明聊天机器人的语言使用模式不稳定。使用身份评定任务和功能磁共振成像,进行神经影像学分析,揭示了在心理化网络中包括 dmPFC 和 rTPJ 的大脑活动的独特模式,这些活动对聊天机器人和人类聊天的反应无法主观区分。这项研究说明了衡量 NLP 生成语言质量的有希望的经验基础:增加评判者的内隐感知作为附加标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/1882d66e5d8d/ADVS-10-2203990-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/a5a52ea84119/ADVS-10-2203990-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/1cc6b959631a/ADVS-10-2203990-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/8ea65a129783/ADVS-10-2203990-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/8ccc85bc817e/ADVS-10-2203990-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/1882d66e5d8d/ADVS-10-2203990-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/a5a52ea84119/ADVS-10-2203990-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/1cc6b959631a/ADVS-10-2203990-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/8ea65a129783/ADVS-10-2203990-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/8ccc85bc817e/ADVS-10-2203990-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61e/10131862/1882d66e5d8d/ADVS-10-2203990-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Implicit Perception of Differences between NLP-Produced and Human-Produced Language in the Mentalizing Network.心理化网络中对 NLP 生成语言和人类生成语言差异的内隐感知。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Apr;10(12):e2203990. doi: 10.1002/advs.202203990. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
Development and testing of a multi-lingual Natural Language Processing-based deep learning system in 10 languages for COVID-19 pandemic crisis: A multi-center study.开发和测试一个基于多语言自然语言处理的深度学习系统,用于 10 种语言的 COVID-19 大流行危机:一项多中心研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;11:1063466. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1063466. eCollection 2023.
3
Bridging people and perspectives: General and language-specific social network structure predict mentalizing across diverse sociolinguistic contexts.弥合人际与视角鸿沟:一般社会网络结构和语言特定社会网络结构可预测不同社会语言环境下的心理化能力。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Dec;76(4):235-250. doi: 10.1037/cep0000273. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Activity in the brain's valuation and mentalizing networks is associated with propagation of online recommendations.大脑估值和心理化网络的活动与在线推荐的传播有关。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 27;11(1):11196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90420-2.
5
Oxytocin effects on the resting-state mentalizing brain network.催产素对静息状态心理化脑网络的影响。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Dec;14(6):2530-2541. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00205-5.
6
Mentalizing in and out of awareness: A meta-analytic review of implicit and explicit mentalizing.意识内与意识外的心理化:内隐和外显心理化的元分析综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;108:102395. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102395. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
7
Evaluation of Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems to annotate drug product labeling with MedDRA terminology.评估自然语言处理 (NLP) 系统,以使用 MedDRA 术语对药品标签进行注释。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
8
The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.运用自然语言处理技术从乳腺磁共振成像报告中提取病灶索引。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0997-3.
9
Sex differences moderate the relationship between adolescent language and mentalization.性别差异调节了青少年语言和心理化之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2012 Oct;3(4):393-405. doi: 10.1037/a0028938. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
10
Assessment of Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Records to Measure Goals-of-Care Discussions as a Clinical Trial Outcome.评估电子健康记录中的自然语言处理以衡量作为临床试验结局的照护目标讨论。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1204.

本文引用的文献

1
Implicit Measures in Clinical Sex Research: A Critical Evaluation.临床性研究中的内隐测量:批判性评价。
Sex Med Rev. 2020 Oct;8(4):531-541. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
2
Mentalizing during social InterAction: A four component model.社交互动中的心理化:一个四成分模型。
Cortex. 2020 May;126:242-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.031. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
3
The neural development of empathy is sensitive to caregiving and early trauma.同理心的神经发育对养育和早期创伤敏感。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 23;10(1):1905. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09927-y.
4
Brain activity during reciprocal social interaction investigated using conversational robots as control condition.采用对话机器人作为对照条件,研究了互惠社会互动过程中的大脑活动。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;374(1771):20180033. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0033.
5
Personality Across the Life Span.人格的毕生发展
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:423-448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103244. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
6
Implicit attitudes to sexual partner concurrency vary by sexual orientation but not by gender-A cross sectional study of Belgian students.性取向对性伴侣同时性的内隐态度存在差异,但与性别无关——对比利时学生的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 May 8;13(5):e0196821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196821. eCollection 2018.
7
Assessment of anxiety in older adults: a review of self-report measures.老年人焦虑评估:自评量表研究综述。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Apr 6;13:573-593. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S114100. eCollection 2018.
8
Assessing the validity and reliability of self-report data on contraception use in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial.评估在移动技术改善计划生育(MOTIF)随机对照试验中关于避孕使用的自我报告数据的有效性和可靠性。
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 15;15(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0494-7.
9
Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing.个体语言习得和处理的差异。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Feb;22(2):154-169. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
10
Weight Bias: A Systematic Review of Characteristics and Psychometric Properties of Self-Report Questionnaires.体重偏见:自我报告问卷的特征与心理测量特性的系统评价
Obes Facts. 2017;10(3):223-237. doi: 10.1159/000475716. Epub 2017 Jun 10.