Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Humber River Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Neurooncol. 2023 Feb;161(3):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04248-z. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Bevacizumab (BEV), at a standard dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks is associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) but no improvement in overall survival (OS) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Few studies have examined the potential dose-dependent efficacy of BEV. In Ontario, reimbursement for the costs of BEV varies, and as a result, our practice began to routinely use lower dose regimens. The main aim of this study was to ensure that there was no harm to patients who received the low dose protocol.
A single-center retrospective study of patients given BEV for rGBM between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Clinical and treatment data including BEV dose regimen [SD (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) vs. LD (5 mg/kg every 2-3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks)] received at the time of rGBM diagnosis were captured. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) on BEV were compared using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Log-rank test was used to compare potential predictive factors. Cox regression model was performed for multivariable analysis of OS and PFS.
A total of 96 patients were included with a median follow-up duration of 6.84 months (range 1.12-50.63 months) from the date of the first infusion. The LD group consisted of 55 of the 96 patients. By virtue of funding mechanisms for BEV, the median age in the LD group was significantly higher (62 vs. 54 years p = 0.009). There was no difference in MGMT status between the two groups (p = 0.60). The LD group had prolonged median PFS (5.89 months versus 3.22 months; p = 0.0112) and OS (10.23 months versus 6.28 months; p = 0.0010). Multivariable analysis including the dose of BEV, the extent of resection, gender, and age revealed that standard dose of BEV, subtotal resection, and female sex were associated with worse overall survival. Nine patients in the SD group vs. 18 patients in the LD group reported an adverse event related to BEV.
For patients with recurrent GBM, we found that a low dose regimen of BEV was associated with prolonged OS and PFS compared to the standard dose regimen. Lower dose schedules may be a better and more cost-effective option for patients with rGBM. Lower costs might provide more equitable access to this very important palliative drug.
贝伐单抗(bevacizumab,BEV)标准剂量为每 2 周 10mg/kg,可延长复发性胶质母细胞瘤(rGBM)患者的无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),但不能改善总生存期(overall survival,OS)。很少有研究探讨 BEV 的潜在剂量依赖性疗效。在安大略省,BEV 的费用报销因不同而有所不同,因此,我们的实践开始常规使用较低剂量方案。本研究的主要目的是确保接受低剂量方案的患者不会受到伤害。
对 2015 年至 2020 年间接受 BEV 治疗 rGBM 的患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。收集了患者的临床和治疗数据,包括 rGBM 诊断时接受的 BEV 剂量方案[标准剂量(10mg/kg,每 2 周 1 次)与低剂量(5mg/kg,每 2-3 周 1 次或 10mg/kg,每 3 周 1 次)]。采用 Kaplan-Meier 乘积限法比较 BEV 的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用对数秩检验比较潜在的预测因素。采用 Cox 回归模型进行 OS 和 PFS 的多变量分析。
共纳入 96 例患者,自首次输注之日起中位随访时间为 6.84 个月(范围为 1.12-50.63 个月)。LD 组 96 例患者中有 55 例。由于 BEV 的资金机制,LD 组的中位年龄明显较高(62 岁比 54 岁,p=0.009)。两组 MGMT 状态无差异(p=0.60)。LD 组的中位 PFS(5.89 个月比 3.22 个月;p=0.0112)和 OS(10.23 个月比 6.28 个月;p=0.0010)均延长。包括 BEV 剂量、切除范围、性别和年龄在内的多变量分析显示,标准剂量的 BEV、次全切除和女性与总体生存率较差相关。SD 组 9 例患者与 LD 组 18 例患者报告与 BEV 相关的不良事件。
对于复发性 GBM 患者,我们发现与标准剂量方案相比,低剂量 BEV 方案与 OS 和 PFS 的延长有关。对于 rGBM 患者,较低剂量方案可能是更好、更具成本效益的选择。较低的成本可能为这种非常重要的姑息性药物提供更公平的获取途径。