• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传多样性与世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录状况。

Genetic diversity and IUCN Red List status.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Center for Biodiversity and Global Change, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2023 Aug;37(4):e14064. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14064. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.14064
PMID:36751982
Abstract

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List is an important and widely used tool for conservation assessment. The IUCN uses information about a species' range, population size, habitat quality and fragmentation levels, and trends in abundance to assess extinction risk. Genetic diversity is not considered, although it affects extinction risk. Declining populations are more strongly affected by genetic drift and higher rates of inbreeding, which can reduce the efficiency of selection, lead to fitness declines, and hinder species' capacities to adapt to environmental change. Given the importance of conserving genetic diversity, attempts have been made to find relationships between red-list status and genetic diversity. Yet, there is still no consensus on whether genetic diversity is captured by the current IUCN Red List categories in a way that is informative for conservation. To assess the predictive power of correlations between genetic diversity and IUCN Red List status in vertebrates, we synthesized previous work and reanalyzed data sets based on 3 types of genetic data: mitochondrial DNA, microsatellites, and whole genomes. Consistent with previous work, species with higher extinction risk status tended to have lower genetic diversity for all marker types, but these relationships were weak and varied across taxa. Regardless of marker type, genetic diversity did not accurately identify threatened species for any taxonomic group. Our results indicate that red-list status is not a useful metric for informing species-specific decisions about the protection of genetic diversity and that genetic data cannot be used to identify threat status in the absence of demographic data. Thus, there is a need to develop and assess metrics specifically designed to assess genetic diversity and inform conservation policy, including policies recently adopted by the UN's Convention on Biological Diversity Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

摘要

世界自然保护联盟(IUCN)红色名录是评估保护状况的重要且广泛使用的工具。IUCN 利用物种分布范围、种群大小、栖息地质量和破碎化水平以及数量趋势等信息来评估灭绝风险。遗传多样性虽然会影响灭绝风险,但并未被列入考虑范围。种群数量减少会受到遗传漂变和更高的近亲繁殖率的强烈影响,这会降低选择效率,导致适应性下降,并阻碍物种适应环境变化的能力。鉴于保护遗传多样性的重要性,人们试图寻找红色名录状况与遗传多样性之间的关系。然而,目前关于遗传多样性是否以对保护具有信息性的方式被纳入当前 IUCN 红色名录类别,仍未达成共识。为了评估遗传多样性与 IUCN 红色名录状况之间相关性的预测能力,我们综合了之前的工作,并基于 3 种遗传数据类型(线粒体 DNA、微卫星和全基因组)重新分析了数据集。与之前的工作一致,所有标记类型的灭绝风险较高的物种往往具有较低的遗传多样性,但这些关系较弱,并且在不同类群中存在差异。无论标记类型如何,遗传多样性都不能准确识别任何分类群的受威胁物种。我们的研究结果表明,红色名录状况不是指导保护遗传多样性的物种特定决策的有用指标,并且在没有人口统计数据的情况下,遗传数据不能用于识别威胁状况。因此,需要开发和评估专门用于评估遗传多样性并为保护政策提供信息的指标,包括最近被联合国生物多样性公约《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》采纳的政策。

相似文献

1
Genetic diversity and IUCN Red List status.遗传多样性与世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录状况。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Aug;37(4):e14064. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14064. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
2
Applying habitat and population-density models to land-cover time series to inform IUCN Red List assessments.应用栖息地和种群密度模型对土地覆盖时间序列进行分析,为 IUCN 红色名录评估提供信息。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Oct;33(5):1084-1093. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13279. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
3
Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments.基于 IUCN 评估的夏威夷考艾岛特有维管束植物的灭绝风险。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Aug;36(4):e13896. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13896. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
A standard approach for including climate change responses in IUCN Red List assessments.将气候变化应对纳入 IUCN 红色名录评估的标准方法。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Jun;38(3):e14227. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14227. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
Testing a global standard for quantifying species recovery and assessing conservation impact.测试一种量化物种恢复和评估保护影响的全球标准。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Dec;35(6):1833-1849. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13756. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
6
A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species.评估 IUCN 濒危物种红色名录影响的框架。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Jun;34(3):632-643. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13454. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
More losers than winners: investigating Anthropocene defaunation through the diversity of population trends.更多的失败者而非成功者:通过种群趋势多样性调查人类世的物种灭绝。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Oct;98(5):1732-1748. doi: 10.1111/brv.12974. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants.红色名录指数在西班牙维管植物保护评估中的应用。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):910-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12437. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
9
Patterns and biases of climate change threats in the IUCN Red List.《IUCN 红色名录中气候变化威胁的模式和偏见》
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):135-147. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13022. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria.根据 IUCN 红色名录标准,检测因气候变化导致的灭绝风险。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Jun;28(3):810-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12234. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Future Projections of Biodiversity Under Global Change Need to Include Genetic Diversity.全球变化下生物多样性的未来预测需要纳入遗传多样性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Aug;31(8):e70477. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70477.
2
Predicting suitable habitats and conservation areas for using MaxEnt and Marxan models.使用MaxEnt和Marxan模型预测适宜栖息地和保护区。
iScience. 2025 Jun 18;28(7):112933. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112933. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.
3
Linking Measures of Inbreeding and Genetic Load to Demographic Histories Across Three Species of Bears.
将近亲繁殖和遗传负荷的测量与三种熊的种群历史联系起来。
Evol Appl. 2025 Jul 16;18(7):e70133. doi: 10.1111/eva.70133. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Global scale assessment of the human-induced extinction crisis of terrestrial carnivores.全球范围内对人为导致的陆地食肉动物灭绝危机的评估。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jul 18;11(29):eadq2853. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adq2853. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
5
The complex DNA molecular combination with a linear and circular structure in mitochondrial genome.线粒体基因组中具有线性和环状结构的复杂DNA分子组合。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 May 29;16:1590173. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1590173. eCollection 2025.
6
GenDivRange: A global dataset of geo-referenced population genetic diversity across species ranges.基因多样性范围:一个跨物种分布范围的地理参考种群遗传多样性全球数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Jun 11;12(1):980. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05303-2.
7
In Vouchers We (Hope to) Trust: Unveiling Hidden Errors in GenBank's Tetrapod Taxonomic Foundations.我们(希望)信赖凭证:揭示GenBank四足动物分类学基础中的隐藏错误。
Mol Ecol. 2025 Jul;34(13):e17812. doi: 10.1111/mec.17812. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
8
Distinguishing species boundaries from geographic variation.从地理变异中区分物种界限。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 13;122(19):e2423688122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2423688122. Epub 2025 May 5.
9
Time-lagged genomic erosion and future environmental risks in a bird on the brink of extinction.一只濒临灭绝鸟类的时间滞后基因组侵蚀与未来环境风险
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Mar;292(2043):20242480. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2480. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
10
Four new genome sequences of the Pallas's cat (): an insight into the patterns of within-species variability.兔狲的四个新基因组序列:对种内变异性模式的洞察
Front Genet. 2024 Dec 9;15:1463774. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1463774. eCollection 2024.