• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从实验室到现实生活中的神经认知偏差。

Neurocognitive biases from the lab to real life.

机构信息

Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) & École normale supérieure (ENS), Paris, France.

出版信息

Commun Biol. 2023 Feb 8;6(1):158. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04544-4.

DOI:10.1038/s42003-023-04544-4
PMID:36754989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9908862/
Abstract

Behavioral results suggest that learning by trial-and-error (i.e., reinforcement learning) relies on a teaching signal, the prediction error, which quantifies the difference between the obtained and the expected reward. Evidence suggests that distinct cortico-striatal circuits are recruited to encode better-than-expected (positive prediction error) and worst-than-expected (negative prediction error) outcomes. A recent study by Villano et al. provides evidence for differential networks that underlie learning from positive and negative prediction errors in humans using real-life behavioral data. More specifically, they found that university students are more likely to update beliefs concerning grade expectations following positive rather than negative prediction errors.

摘要

行为学研究结果表明,通过试错进行的学习(即强化学习)依赖于一种教学信号,即预测误差,它量化了获得的奖励与预期奖励之间的差异。有证据表明,不同的皮质纹状体回路被招募来对好于预期(正预测误差)和差于预期(负预测误差)的结果进行编码。最近,Villano 等人的一项研究利用真实的行为数据,为人类从正、负预测误差中学习的基础上的差异网络提供了证据。更具体地说,他们发现大学生在收到正、负预测误差后,更有可能根据正预测误差更新对成绩期望的信念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ab/9908862/5115f40fb014/42003_2023_4544_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ab/9908862/5115f40fb014/42003_2023_4544_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ab/9908862/5115f40fb014/42003_2023_4544_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Neurocognitive biases from the lab to real life.从实验室到现实生活中的神经认知偏差。
Commun Biol. 2023 Feb 8;6(1):158. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04544-4.
2
Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review.辅助卫生专业人员的决策偏差:系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240716. eCollection 2020.
3
The link between optimism bias and attention bias: A neurocognitive perspective.乐观偏差与注意偏差之间的联系:神经认知视角。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:688-702. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Neurocognitive and Information Processing Biases in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.创伤后应激障碍中的神经认知和信息处理偏差。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Sep 17;20(11):99. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0964-1.
5
Revisiting the validity of measures of social cognitive bias in schizophrenia: Additional results from the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study.重新审视精神分裂症社会认知偏差测量方法的有效性:社会认知心理测量评估(SCOPE)研究的更多结果。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Nov;55(4):441-454. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12113. Epub 2016 May 11.
6
Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review.护士判断和决策中的认知和内隐偏见:范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104284. Epub 2022 May 24.
7
Optimistic amnesia: how online and offline processing shape belief updating and memory biases in immediate and long-term optimism biases.乐观性遗忘:在线和离线加工如何塑造即时和长期乐观偏见中的信念更新和记忆偏差。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 May 4;16(5):453-462. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab011.
8
A review of cognitive biases in youth depression: attention, interpretation and memory.青少年抑郁症中的认知偏差综述:注意力、解释与记忆
Cogn Emot. 2017 Apr;31(3):462-483. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1127215. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Cognitive biases and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in children: examining the role of maternal cognitive bias and child age.儿童认知偏差和强迫症症状:考察母亲认知偏差和儿童年龄的作用。
Behav Ther. 2012 Sep;43(3):593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
10
Attentional and interpretive bias towards illness-related information in chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review.慢性疲劳综合征中对疾病相关信息的注意力和解释偏差:一项系统综述。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;21(4):741-763. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12207.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual differences in naturalistic learning link negative emotionality to the development of anxiety.个体在自然学习中的差异将负性情绪与焦虑的发展联系起来。
Sci Adv. 2023 Jan 4;9(1):eadd2976. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add2976.
2
Reinforcement Learning in Patients With Mood and Anxiety Disorders vs Control Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.心境和焦虑障碍患者与对照个体的强化学习:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):313-322. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0051.
3
Hold your horses: a dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making.
别急:丘脑底核在决策中具有动态计算作用。
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1120-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 Sep 1.