Suppr超能文献

基于 ConvLSTM 的深度神经网络超参数对作物分类性能的影响。

Effect of hyper-parameters on the performance of ConvLSTM based deep neural network in crop classification.

机构信息

Department of Computer Systems Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (UETP), Peshawar, Pakistan.

National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (UETP), Peshawar, Pakistan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0275653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275653. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Deep learning based data driven methods with multi-sensors spectro-temporal data are widely used for pattern identification and land-cover classification in remote sensing domain. However, adjusting the right tuning for the deep learning models is extremely important as different parameter setting can alter the performance of the model. In our research work, we have evaluated the performance of Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) and deep learning techniques, over various hyper-parameters setting for an imbalanced dataset and the one with highest performance is utilized for land-cover classification. The parameters that are considered for experimentation are; Batch size, Number of Layers in ConvLSTM model, and No of filters in each layer of the ConvLSTM are the parameters that will be considered for our experimentation. Experiments also have been conducted on LSTM model for comparison using the same hyper-parameters. It has been found that the two layered ConvLSTM model having 16-filters and a batch size of 128 outperforms other setting scenarios, with an overall validation accuracy of 97.71%. The accuracy achieved for the LSTM is 93.9% for training and 92.7% for testing.

摘要

基于深度学习的多传感器光谱时间数据驱动方法广泛应用于遥感领域的模式识别和土地覆盖分类。然而,调整深度学习模型的正确调参非常重要,因为不同的参数设置会改变模型的性能。在我们的研究工作中,我们评估了卷积长短期记忆(ConvLSTM)和深度学习技术在各种超参数设置下的性能,对于不平衡数据集和性能最高的数据集,我们利用其进行土地覆盖分类。考虑用于实验的参数有:ConvLSTM 模型中的批量大小、ConvLSTM 模型中的层数,以及 ConvLSTM 中每层的滤波器数量,这些参数将用于我们的实验。还使用相同的超参数对 LSTM 模型进行了实验比较。结果发现,具有 16 个滤波器和批量大小为 128 的两层 ConvLSTM 模型的性能优于其他设置方案,总体验证精度为 97.71%。LSTM 的训练精度为 93.9%,测试精度为 92.7%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d691/9910738/6496b6b71a14/pone.0275653.g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验