Clinical Examination in the Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Blinded, Cross-sectional Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of clinical tests for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHODS

This study prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of the Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and lever test in diagnosing ACL injury in 133 patients with knee pathology. The examiner was blinded to the patient's history, symptoms, and laterality of the pain at the time of examination. One hundred twenty-three patients in the study underwent MRI, and 90 went on to arthroscopy. The performance of the examination maneuvers and MRI was calculated.

RESULTS

This study showed notable differences in sensitivity and specificity between the Lachman test and the lever test and in specificity between the anterior drawer test and the lever test. The Lachman test was also found to be more sensitive than the anterior drawer. All ACL tears diagnosed by a composite of the physical examination maneuvers were confirmed by MRI. MRI findings were concordant with arthroscopic findings in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The Lachman test and the anterior draw test demonstrated clinical utility, but the results of the lever test should be interpreted with caution. Clinical examination was found to be highly specific but less sensitive than MRI.