• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极社会比较反馈对运动序列学习及表现预期的影响。

Effects of positive social comparative feedback on motor sequence learning and performance expectancies.

作者信息

Lewis Allison F, Bohnenkamp Rachel, Johnson Lynn, den Ouden Dirk B, Wilcox Sara, Fritz Stacy L, Stewart Jill Campbell

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1005705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005705. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005705
PMID:36760911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9902358/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Positive social comparative feedback indicates to the learner that they are performing better than others. While this type feedback supports motor skill learning in some tasks, the effect of social comparative feedback on implicit motor sequence learning remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of positive social comparative feedback on the learning of and expectancies for a motor sequence task.

METHODS

Forty-eight individuals practiced a joystick-based sequence task and were divided into three feedback groups: CONTROL (no performance feedback), RT ONLY (response time only feedback), and RT+POS (response time plus positive social comparison). Participants attended sessions on two consecutive days: Day 1 for repetitive motor practice/skill acquisition and Day 2 for retention testing. Performance related expectancies, like perceived competence, were measured before and after motor practice on Day 1 and at retention on Day 2.

RESULTS

While all groups improved with practice, the CONTROL group showed better overall performance/learning (faster response times) compared with the RT ONLY group. Despite similar response times, the RT+POS showed higher peak velocities than the RT ONLY group. Overall, the RT+POS and CONTROL demonstrated increases in perceived competence while the RT ONLY group did not.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study suggest that feedback content is an important consideration during motor practice sessions since feedback without context (RT ONLY) may be detrimental to motor sequence learning. The results also suggest that, if providing performance related feedback during practice of a skill that relies on implicit sequence learning processes, comparative context may be necessary for enhancing expectancies and supporting.

摘要

引言

积极的社会比较反馈向学习者表明他们的表现优于他人。虽然这种类型的反馈在某些任务中支持运动技能学习,但社会比较反馈对内隐运动序列学习的影响仍然未知。本研究的目的是确定积极的社会比较反馈对运动序列任务学习和预期的影响。

方法

48名个体练习基于操纵杆的序列任务,并被分为三个反馈组:对照组(无表现反馈)、仅反应时间组(仅反应时间反馈)和反应时间加积极社会比较组(反应时间加积极社会比较)。参与者连续两天参加实验:第1天进行重复性运动练习/技能习得,第2天进行保持测试。在第1天运动练习前后以及第2天保持测试时测量与表现相关的预期,如感知能力。

结果

虽然所有组在练习后都有进步,但与仅反应时间组相比,对照组表现出更好的整体表现/学习效果(反应时间更快)。尽管反应时间相似,但反应时间加积极社会比较组的峰值速度高于仅反应时间组。总体而言,反应时间加积极社会比较组和对照组的感知能力有所提高,而仅反应时间组则没有。

讨论

本研究结果表明,在运动练习过程中,反馈内容是一个重要的考虑因素,因为没有背景信息的反馈(仅反应时间)可能对运动序列学习有害。结果还表明,如果在依赖内隐序列学习过程的技能练习期间提供与表现相关的反馈,比较背景可能对于增强预期和提供支持是必要的。

相似文献

1
Effects of positive social comparative feedback on motor sequence learning and performance expectancies.积极社会比较反馈对运动序列学习及表现预期的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1005705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005705. eCollection 2022.
2
Effect of positive social comparative feedback on the resting state connectivity of dopaminergic neural pathways: A preliminary investigation.积极的社会比较反馈对多巴胺能神经通路静息态连接的影响:初步研究。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2024 Jul;212:107930. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2024.107930. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.最佳练习条件可增强逐步增加错误机会对保留跨步序列任务的益处。
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Dec;56(Pt B):129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Guidance hypothesis with verbal feedback in learning a palpation skill.学习触诊技能时伴有言语反馈的指导假设。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jan;27(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.11.004.
5
Temporal-Comparative Feedback Facilitates Golf Putting.时间比较反馈有助于高尔夫推杆。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;9:2691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02691. eCollection 2018.
6
Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning.自主支持与增强运动学习期望的累加效益。
Hum Mov Sci. 2014 Oct;37:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
7
Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning.社会比较反馈会影响运动技能学习。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Apr;63(4):738-49. doi: 10.1080/17470210903111839. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
8
Enhanced expectancies benefit performance under distraction, but compromise it under stress: Exploring the OPTIMAL theory.增强的期望有利于分散注意力下的表现,但在压力下会影响表现:探索 OPTIMAL 理论。
Hum Mov Sci. 2023 Jun;89:103085. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2023.103085. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
9
Comparative analysis of motor skill acquisition in a novel bimanual task: the role of mental representation and sensorimotor feedback.新型双手任务中运动技能习得的比较分析:心理表征和感觉运动反馈的作用
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 11;18:1425090. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1425090. eCollection 2024.
10
Association between the Effects of Positive Social-Comparative Feedback and Learners' Competitiveness.积极社会比较反馈对学习者竞争能力影响的相关性研究。
J Mot Behav. 2022;54(5):537-547. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2021.2020206. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining social comparison as a behaviour change technique across the behavioural sciences.对将社会比较作为一种行为改变技术应用于行为科学领域的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02209-2.
2
Classifying Learning Speed Using Brain Networks and Psychological States: Unraveling the Interdependence Between Learning Performance, Psychological States, and Brain Functions.利用脑网络和心理状态对学习速度进行分类:揭示学习表现、心理状态和脑功能之间的相互依存关系。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 24;16(9):e70133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70133. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Updates in Motor Learning: Implications for Physical Therapist Practice and Education.运动学习新进展:对物理治疗师实践与教育的启示。
Phys Ther. 2022 Jan 1;102(1). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab250.
2
Multiple Motor Learning Processes in Humans: Defining Their Neurophysiological Bases.人类的多种运动学习过程:定义其神经生理学基础。
Neuroscientist. 2021 Jun;27(3):246-267. doi: 10.1177/1073858420939552. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
3
Principles of Neurorehabilitation After Stroke Based on Motor Learning and Brain Plasticity Mechanisms.基于运动学习和脑可塑性机制的脑卒中后神经康复原则
Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Dec 17;13:74. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074. eCollection 2019.
4
Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence.规范反馈对学习手臂运动序列中运动自动性和运动准确性的分离效应。
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Aug;66:529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
Target Size Manipulations Affect Error-Processing Duration and Success Perceptions but not Behavioural Indices of Learning.目标大小操作影响错误处理持续时间和成功感知,但不影响学习的行为指标。
Brain Sci. 2019 May 23;9(5):119. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9050119.
6
Movement Vigor as a Reflection of Subjective Economic Utility.运动活力是主观经济效用的反映。
Trends Neurosci. 2019 May;42(5):323-336. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
The effect of energy-matched exercise intensity on brain-derived neurotrophic factor and motor learning.能量匹配的运动强度对脑源性神经营养因子和运动学习的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Dec;156:33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Saccade metrics reflect decision-making dynamics during urgent choices.扫视度量反映了紧急选择过程中的决策动态。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 25;9(1):2907. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05319-w.
9
Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance.勇往直前,追求卓越:优化运动表现。
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Aug;60:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Vigor of reaching movements: reward discounts the cost of effort.伸手动作的活力:奖励可降低努力成本。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jun 1;119(6):2347-2357. doi: 10.1152/jn.00872.2017. Epub 2018 Mar 14.