Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗干预对心理困扰的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Palliative Care Interventions Effects on Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy (M.A.N., S.K., P.R.D., E.C., E.K.), Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA; Center for Health Services Research (M.A.N.), Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy (M.A.N., S.K., P.R.D., E.C., E.K.), Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jun;65(6):e691-e713. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Managing psychological distress is an objective of palliative care. No meta-analysis has evaluated whether palliative care reduces psychological distress.

OBJECTIVES

Examine the effects of palliative care on depression, anxiety, and general psychological distress for adults with life-limiting illnesses and their caregivers.

DESIGN

We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and CINAHL for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of palliative care interventions. RCTs were included if they enrolled adults with life-limiting illnesses or their caregivers, reported data on psychological distress at 3 months after study intake, and if authors had described the intervention as "palliative care."

RESULTS

We identified 38 RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria. Many (14/38) included studies excluded participants with common mental health conditions. There were no statistically significant improvements in patient or caregiver anxiety (patient SMD: -0.008, P = 0.96; caregiver SMD: -0.21, P = 0.79), depression (patient SMD: -0.13, P = 0.25; caregiver SMD -0.27, P = 0.08), or psychological distress (patient SMD: 0.26, P = 0.59; caregiver SMD: 0.04, P = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Psychological distress is not likely to be reduced in the context of a typical palliative care intervention. The systemic exclusion of patients with common mental health conditions in more than 1/3 of the studies raises ethical questions about the goals of palliative care RCTS and could perpetuate inequalities.

摘要

背景

管理心理困扰是姑息治疗的目标。没有荟萃分析评估姑息治疗是否能减轻心理困扰。

目的

研究姑息治疗对患有绝症的成年人及其照顾者的抑郁、焦虑和一般心理困扰的影响。

设计

我们检索了 PubMed、PsycInfo、Embase 和 CINAHL 中的姑息治疗干预措施的随机临床试验 (RCT)。如果 RCT 招募了患有绝症的成年人或其照顾者,报告了研究开始后 3 个月的心理困扰数据,并且作者将干预描述为“姑息治疗”,则将其纳入研究。

结果

我们确定了 38 项符合我们纳入标准的 RCT。许多(14/38)研究排除了患有常见心理健康疾病的参与者。患者或照顾者的焦虑(患者 SMD:-0.008,P=0.96;照顾者 SMD:-0.21,P=0.79)、抑郁(患者 SMD:-0.13,P=0.25;照顾者 SMD:-0.27,P=0.08)或心理困扰(患者 SMD:0.26,P=0.59;照顾者 SMD:0.04,P=0.78)均无统计学显著改善。

结论

在典型的姑息治疗干预背景下,心理困扰不太可能减轻。超过 1/3 的研究系统地排除了患有常见心理健康疾病的患者,这引发了姑息治疗 RCT 目标的伦理问题,并可能使不平等现象永久化。

相似文献

3
10
Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia.针对痴呆症患者的基于音乐的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 7;3(3):CD003477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub5.

引用本文的文献

7
Palliative Care Psychiatry: Building Synergy Across the Spectrum.缓和医疗精神医学:在整个领域建立协同作用。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Mar;26(3):60-72. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01485-5. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验