• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺移植供体(LUNDON)可接受性评分的制定与验证。

Development and validation of the lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score for pulmonary transplantation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2023 Apr;23(4):540-548. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.014
PMID:36764887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10234600/
Abstract

There is a chronic shortage of donor lungs for pulmonary transplantation due, in part, to low lung utilization rates in the United States. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database (2006-2019) and developed the lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score. A total of 83 219 brain-dead donors were included and were randomly divided into derivation (n = 58 314, 70%) and validation (n = 24 905, 30%) cohorts. The overall lung acceptance was 27.3% (n = 22 767). Donor factors associated with the lung acceptance were age, maximum creatinine, ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen, mechanism of death by asphyxiation or drowning, history of cigarette use (≥20 pack-years), history of myocardial infarction, chest x-ray appearance, bloodstream infection, and the occurrence of cardiac arrest after brain death. The prediction model had high discriminatory power (C statistic, 0.891; 95% confidence interval, 0.886-0.895) in the validation cohort. We developed a web-based, user-friendly tool (available at https://sites.wustl.edu/lundon) that provides the predicted probability of donor lung acceptance. LUNDON score was also associated with recipient survival in patients with high lung allocation scores. In conclusion, the multivariable LUNDON score uses readily available donor characteristics to reliably predict lung acceptability. Widespread adoption of this model may standardize lung donor evaluation and improve lung utilization rates.

摘要

由于美国肺部利用率低,导致用于肺移植的捐献者肺部器官长期短缺。我们使用来自移植受者科学登记处数据库的数据(2006-2019 年)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,并开发了肺供体(LUNDON)可接受性评分。共纳入 83219 例脑死亡供者,随机分为推导队列(n = 58314,70%)和验证队列(n = 24905,30%)。总体肺接受率为 27.3%(n = 22767)。与肺接受相关的供者因素包括年龄、最大肌酐、动脉部分压力与吸入氧分数的比值、窒息或溺水导致的死亡机制、吸烟史(≥20 包年)、心肌梗死史、胸部 X 线表现、血流感染和脑死亡后发生心脏骤停。该预测模型在验证队列中具有较高的区分能力(C 统计值,0.891;95%置信区间,0.886-0.895)。我们开发了一个基于网络的、用户友好的工具(可在 https://sites.wustl.edu/lundon 获得),该工具提供供者肺部接受预测概率。在高肺分配评分的患者中,LUNDON 评分也与受体生存率相关。总之,多变量 LUNDON 评分使用现成的供者特征来可靠地预测肺可接受性。该模型的广泛应用可能会使肺供者评估标准化,并提高肺部利用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/c3c409b5fa3e/nihms-1901888-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/046f40cc707e/nihms-1901888-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/8e0d992a132b/nihms-1901888-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/df65599a439b/nihms-1901888-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/c3c409b5fa3e/nihms-1901888-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/046f40cc707e/nihms-1901888-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/8e0d992a132b/nihms-1901888-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/df65599a439b/nihms-1901888-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fd/10234600/c3c409b5fa3e/nihms-1901888-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score for pulmonary transplantation.肺移植供体(LUNDON)可接受性评分的制定与验证。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Apr;23(4):540-548. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
2
Use of a novel donor lung scoring system as a tool for increasing lung recovery for transplantation.使用一种新型供体肺评分系统作为提高肺移植恢复率的工具。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Apr;169(4):1162-1171.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.08.047. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
3
Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score.基于更新的肺综合分配评分的新型供肺评分系统的验证。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jul;24(7):1279-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.032. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
4
Lung Quality and Utilization in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death Within the United States.美国循环判定死亡后器官捐献中的肺质量与利用率
Am J Transplant. 2016 Apr;16(4):1207-15. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13599. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
The Impact of Donor Asphyxiation or Drowning on Pediatric Lung Transplant Recipients.供体窒息或溺水对儿科肺移植受者的影响。
Transplantation. 2021 Mar 1;105(3):620-627. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003262.
6
Estimated impact of hepatitis C-positive lung donor utilization on US donor lung supply.丙型肝炎阳性肺供体利用对美国供体肺供应的估计影响。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Jan;20(1):289-297. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15558. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
7
Comparison of donor scores in bilateral lung transplantation-A large single-center analysis.双侧肺移植供者评分的比较——一项大型单中心分析。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jun;21(6):2132-2144. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16402. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
8
Survival and spirometry outcomes after lung transplantation from donors aged 70 years and older.70 岁及以上供者肺移植受者的生存和肺功能结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Oct;34(10):1325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Organ Dysfunction and Failure Following Brain Death Do Not Preclude Successful Donation.脑死亡后的器官功能障碍和衰竭并不排除成功捐献。
World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2933-2939. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4089-1.
10
Outcomes of lung transplantation at a Canadian center using donors declined in the United States.加拿大中心使用来自美国的捐献者进行肺移植的结果下降了。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec;164(6):1661-1668.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.098. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Allocation Out of Sequence in Lung Transplant: An Analysis of the UNOS Registry.肺移植中的非顺序分配:器官共享联合网络登记处分析
JAMA Surg. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2142.
2
Application and validation of a newly developed lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score for lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.一种新开发的肺移植供体(LUNDON)可接受性评分在肺移植中的应用与验证:一项回顾性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2025 May 30;17(5):3297-3306. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-259. Epub 2025 May 28.
3
Lung Donation and Transplant Recipient Outcomes at Independent vs Hospital-Based Donor Care Units.

本文引用的文献

1
Allograft discard risk index for lung transplantation.肺移植的同种异体移植物丢弃风险指数
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Dec;40(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Dissemination and Implementation Science in Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Review and Case Study.心胸外科领域的传播与实施科学:综述与案例研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Aug;114(2):373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Essentialism and Exclusion: Racism in Cancer Risk Prediction Models.本质主义与排斥:癌症风险预测模型中的种族主义。
独立供肺者照护单位与医院附设供肺者照护单位对肺脏捐赠及移植受赠者预后之影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17107.
4
Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score.基于更新的肺综合分配评分的新型供肺评分系统的验证。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jul;24(7):1279-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.032. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1620-1624. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab074.
4
Ventilation in the prone position improves oxygenation and results in more lungs being transplanted from organ donors with hypoxemia and atelectasis.俯卧位通气可改善氧合,并使更多患有低氧血症和肺不张的器官捐献者的肺部得以移植。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Feb;40(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Comparison of donor scores in bilateral lung transplantation-A large single-center analysis.双侧肺移植供者评分的比较——一项大型单中心分析。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jun;21(6):2132-2144. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16402. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
A new lung donor score to predict short and long-term survival in lung transplantation.一种预测肺移植短期和长期生存的新肺供体评分。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):5485-5494. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2043.
7
A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.一个用于评估器官获取组织追求和利用非理想供体肺意愿的三级系统。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1269-1277. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16347. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.将癌症风险预测模型转化为个性化癌症风险评估工具:成功的绊脚石和策略。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2389-2394. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
9
Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms.隐匿于众目睽睽之下——重新审视临床算法中种族校正的应用
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):874-882. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2004740. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Donor heart and lung procurement: A consensus statement.供心和供肺获取:共识声明。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jun;39(6):501-517. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Apr 21.