Suppr超能文献

一个用于评估器官获取组织追求和利用非理想供体肺意愿的三级系统。

A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1269-1277. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16347. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

Lungs from "nonideal," but acceptable donors are underutilized; however, organ procurement organization (OPO) metrics do not reflect the extent to which OPO-specific practices contribute to these trends. We developed a comprehensive system to evaluate nonideal lung donor avoidance, or risk aversion among OPOs. Adult donors in the UNOS registry who donated ≥1 organ for transplantation between 2007 and 2018 were included. Nonideal donors had any of age>50, smoking history ≥20 pack-years, PaO /FiO ratio ≤350, donation after circulatory death, or increased risk status. OPO-level risk aversion in donor pursuit, consent attainment, lung recovery, and transplantation was assessed. Among 83916 donors, 70372 (83.9%) were nonideal. Unadjusted OPO-level rates of nonideal donor pursuit ranged from 81 to 100%. In a three-tier system of overall risk aversion, tier 3 OPOs (least risk-averse) had the highest rates of nonideal donor pursuit, consent attainment, lung recovery, and transplantation. Tier 1 OPOs (most risk-averse) had the lowest rates of donor pursuit, consent attainment, and lung recovery, but higher rates of transplantation compared to tier 2 OPOs (moderately risk-averse). Risk aversion varies among OPOs and across the donation process. OPO evaluations should reflect early donation process stages to best differentiate over- and underperforming OPOs and encourage optimal OPO-specific performance.

摘要

非理想但可接受的供体肺的利用率较低;然而,器官获取组织(OPO)的衡量标准并未反映出 OPO 特定实践对这些趋势的影响程度。我们开发了一个全面的系统来评估 OPO 避免非理想肺供体的情况,或评估 OPO 对风险的规避。该研究纳入了 2007 年至 2018 年间 UNOS 登记系统中≥1 个器官用于移植的成年供体。非理想供体的定义为年龄>50 岁、吸烟史≥20 包年、PaO /FiO 比值≤350、循环死亡后捐献或风险增加。评估了 OPO 级别的供体追求、同意获得、肺复苏和移植的风险规避情况。在 83916 名供体中,70372 名(83.9%)为非理想供体。未经调整的 OPO 级非理想供体追求率为 81%至 100%。在一个整体风险规避的三级系统中,第三级 OPO (风险规避最低)的非理想供体追求、同意获得、肺复苏和移植率最高。第一级 OPO (风险规避最高)的供体追求、同意获得和肺复苏率最低,但与第二级 OPO (中度风险规避)相比,移植率更高。OPO 之间的风险规避情况存在差异,且贯穿整个捐赠过程。OPO 的评估应反映早期捐赠过程阶段,以最佳区分表现良好和表现不佳的 OPO,并鼓励 OPO 发挥最佳的特定表现。

相似文献

7
Organ procurement organization (OPO), best practices.器官获取组织(OPO),最佳实践。
Clin Transplant. 2001;15 Suppl 6:16-21. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.00003.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of nonuse of donation after circulatory death lung allografts.不使用循环死亡供肺的预测因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):458-466.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.111. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Predictors of Older Donor Lung Use: Are We Too Good at Saying No?老年供体肺使用的预测因素:我们是否太擅长拒绝了?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1683-1690. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.050. Epub 2020 May 31.
3
Variability in donor organ offer acceptance and lung transplantation survival.供体器官接受率和肺移植存活率的差异。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr;39(4):353-362. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.010. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Lung.OPTN/SRTR 2018 年度数据报告:肺。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Jan;20 Suppl s1:427-508. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15677.
10
A Five-Tier System for Improving the Categorization of Transplant Program Performance.提高移植项目绩效分类的五级系统。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1979-1991. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12726. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验