School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1269-1277. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16347. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Lungs from "nonideal," but acceptable donors are underutilized; however, organ procurement organization (OPO) metrics do not reflect the extent to which OPO-specific practices contribute to these trends. We developed a comprehensive system to evaluate nonideal lung donor avoidance, or risk aversion among OPOs. Adult donors in the UNOS registry who donated ≥1 organ for transplantation between 2007 and 2018 were included. Nonideal donors had any of age>50, smoking history ≥20 pack-years, PaO /FiO ratio ≤350, donation after circulatory death, or increased risk status. OPO-level risk aversion in donor pursuit, consent attainment, lung recovery, and transplantation was assessed. Among 83916 donors, 70372 (83.9%) were nonideal. Unadjusted OPO-level rates of nonideal donor pursuit ranged from 81 to 100%. In a three-tier system of overall risk aversion, tier 3 OPOs (least risk-averse) had the highest rates of nonideal donor pursuit, consent attainment, lung recovery, and transplantation. Tier 1 OPOs (most risk-averse) had the lowest rates of donor pursuit, consent attainment, and lung recovery, but higher rates of transplantation compared to tier 2 OPOs (moderately risk-averse). Risk aversion varies among OPOs and across the donation process. OPO evaluations should reflect early donation process stages to best differentiate over- and underperforming OPOs and encourage optimal OPO-specific performance.
非理想但可接受的供体肺的利用率较低;然而,器官获取组织(OPO)的衡量标准并未反映出 OPO 特定实践对这些趋势的影响程度。我们开发了一个全面的系统来评估 OPO 避免非理想肺供体的情况,或评估 OPO 对风险的规避。该研究纳入了 2007 年至 2018 年间 UNOS 登记系统中≥1 个器官用于移植的成年供体。非理想供体的定义为年龄>50 岁、吸烟史≥20 包年、PaO /FiO 比值≤350、循环死亡后捐献或风险增加。评估了 OPO 级别的供体追求、同意获得、肺复苏和移植的风险规避情况。在 83916 名供体中,70372 名(83.9%)为非理想供体。未经调整的 OPO 级非理想供体追求率为 81%至 100%。在一个整体风险规避的三级系统中,第三级 OPO (风险规避最低)的非理想供体追求、同意获得、肺复苏和移植率最高。第一级 OPO (风险规避最高)的供体追求、同意获得和肺复苏率最低,但与第二级 OPO (中度风险规避)相比,移植率更高。OPO 之间的风险规避情况存在差异,且贯穿整个捐赠过程。OPO 的评估应反映早期捐赠过程阶段,以最佳区分表现良好和表现不佳的 OPO,并鼓励 OPO 发挥最佳的特定表现。