• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本质主义与排斥:癌症风险预测模型中的种族主义。

Essentialism and Exclusion: Racism in Cancer Risk Prediction Models.

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1620-1624. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab074.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djab074
PMID:33905490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8634398/
Abstract

Cancer risk prediction models have the potential to revolutionize the science and practice of cancer prevention and control by identifying the likelihood that a patient will develop cancer at some point in the future, likely experience more benefit than harm from a given intervention, and survive their cancer for a certain number of years. The ability of risk prediction models to produce estimates that are valid and reliable for people from diverse socio-demographic backgrounds-and consequently their utility for broadening the reach of precision medicine to marginalized populations-depends on ensuring that the risk factors included in the model are represented as thoroughly and as accurately as possible. However, cancer risk prediction models created in the United States have a critical limitation, the origins of which stem from the country's earliest days: they either erroneously treat the social construct of race as an immutable biological factor (ie, they "essentialize" race), or they exclude from the model those socio-contextual factors that are associated with both race and health outcomes. Models that essentialize race and/or exclude socio-contextual factors sometimes incorporate "race corrections" that adjust a patient's risk estimate up or down based on their race. This commentary discusses the origins of race corrections, potential flaws with such corrections, and strategies for developing cohorts for developing risk prediction models that do not essentialize race or exclude key socio-contextual factors. Such models will help move the science of cancer prevention and control towards its goal of eliminating cancer disparities and achieving health equity.

摘要

癌症风险预测模型通过识别患者在未来某个时间点患癌症的可能性、确定他们从特定干预措施中获得的益处是否超过危害,以及在一定年限内生存的可能性,有可能彻底改变癌症预防和控制的科学和实践。风险预测模型能够为来自不同社会人口背景的人群提供有效且可靠的估计,从而为将精准医学的应用范围扩大到边缘化人群提供实用价值,这取决于确保模型中包含的风险因素尽可能全面和准确地体现出来。然而,美国创建的癌症风险预测模型存在一个关键的局限性,其根源可以追溯到这个国家的早期:这些模型要么错误地将种族这一社会建构视为不可改变的生物因素(即“本质主义”种族),要么将与种族和健康结果相关的社会背景因素排除在模型之外。将种族本质化和/或排除社会背景因素的模型有时会采用“种族修正”,根据患者的种族来调整其风险估计值的高低。本评论讨论了种族修正的起源、这些修正存在的潜在缺陷,以及开发不将种族本质化或排除关键社会背景因素的风险预测模型队列的策略。这些模型将有助于推动癌症预防和控制科学朝着消除癌症差异和实现健康公平的目标迈进。

相似文献

1
Essentialism and Exclusion: Racism in Cancer Risk Prediction Models.本质主义与排斥:癌症风险预测模型中的种族主义。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1620-1624. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab074.
2
Two Threats to Precision Medicine Equity.精准医学公平的两大威胁
Ethn Dis. 2019 Dec 12;29(Suppl 3):629-640. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S3.629. eCollection 2019.
3
Commentary: Critical Race Theory Training to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities: The Public Health Critical Race Praxis Institute.评论:消除种族和民族健康差异的批判种族理论培训:公共卫生批判种族实践研究所。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Aug 9;28(Suppl 1):279-284. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S1.279. eCollection 2018.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
From Race to Racism and Disparities to Equity: An Actionable Biopsychosocial Approach to Breast Cancer Outcomes.从种族到种族主义,从差异到公平:一种可行的乳腺癌结局的生物心理社会方法。
Cancer J. 2023;29(6):316-322. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000677.
6
Racism and Kidney Health: Turning Equity Into a Reality.种族主义与肾脏健康:将公平变为现实。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jun;77(6):951-962. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
7
Barriers to and opportunities for advancing racial equity in cervical cancer screening in the United States.推进美国宫颈癌筛查中种族公平的障碍和机遇。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03151-7.
8
What does critical race theory have to do with academic medicine?批判种族理论与学术医学有什么关系?
J Natl Med Assoc. 2022 Jun;114(3):274-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
9
Discussing and Teaching About Race and Health Inequities.探讨和讲授种族与健康不平等问题。
Chest. 2024 May;165(5):1198-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
10
A health equity framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models.支持下一代癌症人群模拟模型的健康公平框架。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 Nov 8;2023(62):255-264. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad017.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and Applying the BE-FAIR Equity Framework to a Population Health Predictive Model: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.将BE-FAIR公平性框架开发并应用于人群健康预测模型:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug;40(11):2537-2547. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09462-1. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
2
Analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ by self-reported race reveals molecular differences related to outcome.基于自我报告的种族分析导管原位癌揭示了与预后相关的分子差异。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 2;26(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01885-8.
3
Can evidence drive health equity in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond?能否以证据推动 COVID-19 大流行及以后的健康公平?
J Public Health Policy. 2024 Mar;45(1):137-151. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00452-3. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Identifying Frequently Endorsed Benefits and Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening for African-Born Women in the NYC Metropolitan Area: a Pilot Study.识别纽约市大都市区非洲出生女性乳腺癌筛查中常见的认可益处和障碍:一项试点研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Feb;12(1):212-221. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01865-2. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
5
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mammography-Based Future Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review.基于人工智能驱动的乳腺钼靶摄影的未来乳腺癌风险预测:一项系统综述。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 Feb;21(2):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.10.018. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
Approaches to developing de novo cancer population models to examine questions about cancer and race in bladder, gastric, and endometrial cancer and multiple myeloma: the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network incubator program.开发新的癌症人群模型的方法,以研究膀胱癌、胃癌、子宫内膜癌和多发性骨髓瘤中癌症和种族相关问题:癌症干预和监测建模网络孵化器计划。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 Nov 8;2023(62):219-230. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad021.
7
A catchment and location-allocation analysis of mammography access in Delaware, US: implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.美国特拉华州乳腺 X 光检查机会的集水区和位置分配分析:对乳腺癌筛查地理机会差异的影响。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 8;25(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01738-w.
8
An essential goal within reach: attaining diversity, equity, and inclusion for the Journal of the National Cancer Institute journals.一个触手可及的重要目标:为《国家癌症研究所杂志》系列期刊实现多元化、公平性和包容性。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Aug 31;7(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad063.
9
Disentangling age, gender, and racial/ethnic disparities in multiple myeloma burden: a modeling study.解析多发性骨髓瘤负担中的年龄、性别和种族/民族差异:一项建模研究。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 20;14(1):5768. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41223-8.
10
Inequities in referrals to a breast cancer risk assessment and prevention clinic: a mixed methods study.不平等转诊至乳腺癌风险评估和预防诊所:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Aug 25;24(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02126-1.