• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.将癌症风险预测模型转化为个性化癌症风险评估工具:成功的绊脚石和策略。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2389-2394. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
2
Development and validation of risk models and molecular diagnostics to permit personalized management of cancer.开发和验证风险模型和分子诊断,以实现癌症的个体化管理。
Cancer. 2014 Jan 1;120(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28393. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
3
Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.癌症诊断工具辅助初级保健决策:混合方法系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(66):1-332. doi: 10.3310/hta24660.
4
Public health genomics and personalized prevention: lessons from the COGS project.公共卫生基因组学与个性化预防:COGS 项目的经验教训。
J Intern Med. 2013 Nov;274(5):451-6. doi: 10.1111/joim.12094.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Oncotyrol--Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine: Methods and Applications of Health Technology Assessment and Outcomes Research.肿瘤控制——个性化癌症医学中心:卫生技术评估与结果研究的方法及应用
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):330-40. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
7
The Relevance of Mass Spectrometry Analysis for Personalized Medicine through Its Successful Application in Cancer "Omics".通过在癌症“组学”中的成功应用,探讨质谱分析在个体化医学中的相关性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 25;20(10):2576. doi: 10.3390/ijms20102576.
8
Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine.遗传学、基因组学与癌症风险评估:个性化医疗时代的现状与未来方向
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Sep-Oct;61(5):327-59. doi: 10.3322/caac.20128. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
9
Machine learning techniques for personalized breast cancer risk prediction: comparison with the BCRAT and BOADICEA models.机器学习技术在个体化乳腺癌风险预测中的应用:与 BCRAT 和 BOADICEA 模型的比较。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 20;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1158-4.
10
Key Lessons Learned from Moffitt's Molecular Tumor Board: The Clinical Genomics Action Committee Experience.从莫菲特分子肿瘤委员会吸取的关键经验教训:临床基因组学行动委员会的经验。
Oncologist. 2017 Feb;22(2):144-151. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0195. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Scanning the horizon of personalized prevention research: an overview of ongoing European funded initiatives.审视个性化预防研究的前景:欧洲正在进行的资助项目概述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 12;13:1561328. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1561328. eCollection 2025.
2
Early identification of people at high risk of oral cancer-A review of existing risk prediction models.口腔癌高危人群的早期识别——现有风险预测模型综述
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Aug;13(8):2851-2856. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_117_24. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach.基于风险的乳腺癌筛查结果通过风险可视化呈现:一种参与式设计方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02483-6.
4
Biomarkers for Early Cancer Detection: A Landscape View of Recent Advancements, Spotlighting Pancreatic and Liver Cancers.早期癌症检测的生物标志物:近期进展全景,聚焦胰腺癌和肝癌
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 14;7(3):586-613. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.3c00346. eCollection 2024 Mar 8.
5
Predicting five-year interval second breast cancer risk in women with prior breast cancer.预测有既往乳腺癌史的女性五年间间隔性二次乳腺癌风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jun 7;116(6):929-937. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae063.
6
Testing Explanations for Skepticism of Personalized Risk Information.测试对个人风险信息持怀疑态度的原因。
Med Decis Making. 2023 May;43(4):430-444. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231162824. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
7
Tumour Growth Models of Breast Cancer for Evaluating Early Detection-A Summary and a Simulation Study.用于评估早期检测的乳腺癌肿瘤生长模型——综述与模拟研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;15(3):912. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030912.
8
Development and validation of the lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score for pulmonary transplantation.肺移植供体(LUNDON)可接受性评分的制定与验证。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Apr;23(4):540-548. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
9
Need for numbers: assessing cancer survivors' needs for personalized and generic statistical information.需要数字:评估癌症幸存者对个性化和通用统计信息的需求。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02005-2.
10
Predicting breast cancer risk in a racially diverse, community-based sample of potentially high-risk women.预测一个具有潜在高风险的、多样化的、基于社区的女性群体中的乳腺癌风险。
Cancer Med. 2022 Nov;11(21):4043-4052. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4721. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms.隐匿于众目睽睽之下——重新审视临床算法中种族校正的应用
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):874-882. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2004740. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Addressing Social Determinants of Health: Time for a Polysocial Risk Score.应对健康的社会决定因素:是时候采用多社会风险评分了。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1553-1554. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2436.
3
A New Comprehensive Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Family History, Personal Characteristics, and Environmental Factors.一种新型综合结直肠癌风险预测模型,纳入家族史、个体特征和环境因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Mar;29(3):549-557. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0929. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
4
Clinical and Economic Impact of Tailoring Screening to Predicted Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Decision Analytic Modeling Study.基于预测结直肠癌风险的个体化筛查:决策分析模型研究的临床和经济影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Feb;29(2):318-328. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0949. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Cancer screening risk literacy of physicians in training: An experimental study.培训医师的癌症筛查风险素养:一项实验研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 3;14(7):e0218821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218821. eCollection 2019.
6
The Impact of a Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid on Initiation of Mammography Among Younger Women: Report of a Randomized Trial.基于风险的乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具对年轻女性乳腺钼靶检查启动的影响:一项随机试验报告
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Jan 17;4(1):2381468318812889. doi: 10.1177/2381468318812889. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
7
Comparison of Performance Between a Short Categorized Lifestyle Exposure-based Colon Cancer Risk Prediction Tool and a Model Using Continuous Measures.基于短分类生活方式暴露的结肠癌风险预测工具与使用连续测量的模型的性能比较。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2018 Dec;11(12):841-848. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0196. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Behavioral impact of return of genetic test results for complex disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.复杂疾病遗传检测结果回报的行为影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2018 Dec;37(12):1134-1144. doi: 10.1037/hea0000683. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened.未接受过筛查的成年人全国代表性样本对在线结直肠癌风险估计的反应。
J Behav Med. 2018 Jun;41(3):289-298. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9902-7. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
10
"I don't believe it." Acceptance and skepticism of genetic health information among African-American and White smokers.“我真不敢相信。”非裔美国人和白种烟民对基因健康信息的接受和怀疑。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jul;184:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.053. Epub 2017 May 3.

将癌症风险预测模型转化为个性化癌症风险评估工具:成功的绊脚石和策略。

Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2389-2394. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861
PMID:33046450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8170537/
Abstract

Cancer risk prediction models such as those published in are a cornerstone of precision medicine and public health efforts to improve population health outcomes by tailoring preventive strategies and therapeutic treatments to the people who are most likely to benefit. However, there are several barriers to the effective translation, dissemination, and implementation of cancer risk prediction models into clinical and public health practice. In this commentary, we discuss two broad categories of barriers. Specifically, we assert that the successful use of risk-stratified cancer prevention and treatment strategies is particularly unlikely if risk prediction models are translated into risk assessment tools that (i) are difficult for the public to understand or (ii) are not structured in a way to engender the public's confidence that the results are accurate. We explain what aspects of a risk assessment tool's design and content may impede understanding and acceptance by the public. We also describe strategies for translating a cancer risk prediction model into a cancer risk assessment tool that is accessible, meaningful, and useful for the public and in clinical practice.

摘要

癌症风险预测模型,如在 中发表的那些,是精准医学和公共卫生努力的基石,旨在通过针对最有可能受益的人群定制预防策略和治疗方法来改善人口健康结果。然而,癌症风险预测模型在有效转化为临床和公共卫生实践方面存在几个障碍。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了两大类障碍。具体来说,我们断言,如果风险预测模型转化为以下风险评估工具,那么风险分层的癌症预防和治疗策略的成功使用尤其不太可能:(i) 公众难以理解,或 (ii) 没有以一种让公众相信结果准确的方式构建。我们解释了风险评估工具的设计和内容的哪些方面可能会阻碍公众的理解和接受。我们还描述了将癌症风险预测模型转化为公众和临床实践中可访问、有意义和有用的癌症风险评估工具的策略。