Shrestha Abhigan Babu, Mehta Aashna, Pokharel Pashupati, Mishra Aakash, Adhikari Lukash, Shrestha Sajina, Yadav Randhir Sagar, Khanal Surakshya, Sah Ranjit, Nowrouzi-Kia Behdin, Padhi Bijaya Kumar, Chattu Vijay Kumar
Department of Internal Medicine, M Abdur Rahim Medical College, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4008 Debrecen, Hungary.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;13(3):491. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030491.
(1) Background: Long COVID syndrome is a significant cause of morbidity in COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic with varied clinical presentations beyond three weeks. Furthermore, the relevance of considering cardiovascular outcomes in post-COVID-19 syndrome is important in the current COVID-19 pandemic; (2) Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches were conducted from multiple databases without language restrictions until October 8, 2022, to find studies evaluating cardiovascular outcomes such as arrhythmias, myocardium and pericardium diseases, coronary vessel disease, and thromboembolic disorders in post-COVID cases. The pooled odds ratio (OR), and standard mean difference (SMD) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed to find the association; (3) Results: Altogether, seven studies with a total of 8,126,462 (cases: 1,321,305; controls: 6,805,157) participants were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios of cardiovascular outcomes were significantly higher in post-COVID cases (OR > 1, < 0.05) than in controls. However, the mortality (OR: 4.76, = 0.13), and heart rate variability (SMD: -0.06, = 0.91) between cases and controls were not statistically significant; (4) Conclusions: Significant cardiovascular sequelae in long COVID syndrome highlight the importance of careful cardiac monitoring of COVID-19 patients in the post-COVID phase to address cardiovascular complications as soon as possible; larger-scale prospective studies are required for accurate estimation.
(1)背景:新冠后综合征是新冠病毒感染患者发病的重要原因,这些患者在三周后仍有各种临床表现的症状。此外,在当前的新冠疫情中,考虑新冠后综合征中心血管结局的相关性很重要;(2)方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。在2022年10月8日之前,对多个数据库进行了系统检索,检索无语言限制,以查找评估新冠后病例中心血管结局的研究,如心律失常、心肌和心包疾病、冠状动脉疾病和血栓栓塞性疾病。计算合并比值比(OR)和标准平均差(SMD)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)以发现关联;(3)结果:荟萃分析共纳入7项研究,共有8126462名参与者(病例:1321305例;对照:6805157例)。新冠后病例中心血管结局的合并比值比显著高于对照组(OR>1,<0.05)。然而,病例组和对照组之间的死亡率(OR:4.76,=0.13)和心率变异性(SMD:-0.06,=0.91)无统计学意义;(4)结论:新冠后综合征中显著的心血管后遗症凸显了在新冠后阶段对新冠病毒感染患者进行仔细心脏监测以尽快解决心血管并发症的重要性;需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来进行准确估计。