• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向患有慢性病的老年人传达预后信息:对决策的形式偏好和参与程度如何?一项医院调查。

Delivering Prognostic News to Older People with Chronic Disease: What Format Preference and Level of Involvement in Decision Making? A Hospital Survey.

作者信息

Lewis Ebony T, Hammill Kathrine, Culbert Rebekah, van der Merwe Madeleen, Sahay Ashlyn, Turner Robin, Cardona Magnolia

机构信息

School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):444. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030444.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11030444
PMID:36767019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9913994/
Abstract

Shared decision making near end of life is a balancing act of communicating prognosis to patients and their surrogates/families and engaging them in considering value-concordant management choices. This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine the format in which older patients with chronic illnesses would prefer to receive prognostic information on their treatment options and disease progression, and their desired level of engagement in decision making. With a 60% participation rate, 139 inpatients in two hospitals and five surrogates were presented with six hypothetical scenarios with a randomly assigned sequence: verbal and written summary, graph, table, photo, video, and pamphlet. The majority (76%) of respondents chose the traditional verbal communication of prognosis by their doctor with a written summary as a reference and to share with family; the second choice was a condition-specific pamphlet (63%). Many found the graph and photo to be distressing (36% and 42%, respectively). Most (71%) wanted to know everything about their condition trajectory, and 63% chose shared decision making rather than completely autonomous or full delegation to clinicians or family. There were no gender differentials between wanting to know it all, supporting shared decision making or the preferred format for breaking news ( > 0.05). Older hospitalized patients with chronic conditions are willing to discuss end-of-life issues, learn about their prognosis, and be involved in shared decision making. Innovative formats such as graphs, videos, or photos were not welcome as part of the prognostic discussion.

摘要

临终时的共同决策是一项平衡的工作,既要向患者及其代理人/家属传达预后信息,又要让他们参与考虑符合价值观的管理选择。这项横断面调查旨在确定患有慢性疾病的老年患者更倾向于以何种形式接收关于其治疗选择和疾病进展的预后信息,以及他们期望参与决策的程度。参与率为60%,两所医院的139名住院患者和5名代理人被随机分配了六种假设情景:口头和书面总结、图表、表格、照片、视频和宣传册。大多数(76%)受访者选择医生以口头方式传达预后,并以书面总结作为参考,以便与家人分享;其次是特定病情的宣传册(63%)。许多人认为图表和照片令人痛苦(分别为36%和42%)。大多数(71%)人想了解自己病情的所有情况,63%的人选择共同决策,而不是完全自主决策或完全委托给临床医生或家人。在想了解全部情况、支持共同决策或接收坏消息的首选形式方面,不存在性别差异(>0.05)。患有慢性疾病的老年住院患者愿意讨论临终问题,了解自己的预后,并参与共同决策。图表、视频或照片等创新形式作为预后讨论的一部分并不受欢迎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c5/9913994/a9b6cb01902d/healthcare-11-00444-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c5/9913994/a9b6cb01902d/healthcare-11-00444-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c5/9913994/a9b6cb01902d/healthcare-11-00444-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Delivering Prognostic News to Older People with Chronic Disease: What Format Preference and Level of Involvement in Decision Making? A Hospital Survey.向患有慢性病的老年人传达预后信息:对决策的形式偏好和参与程度如何?一项医院调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):444. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030444.
2
How Do Patients with Life-Limiting Illness and Caregivers Want End-Of-Life Prognostic Information Delivered? A Pilot Study.患有危及生命疾病的患者及其护理人员希望如何获得临终预后信息?一项试点研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;9(7):784. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070784.
3
The Impact of Visualization Format and Navigational Options on Laypeople's Perception and Preference of Surgery Information Videos: Randomized Controlled Trial and Online Survey.可视化格式和导航选项对非专业人士对外科手术信息视频的认知及偏好的影响:随机对照试验与在线调查
J Particip Med. 2018 Nov 22;10(4):e12338. doi: 10.2196/12338.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Preferences for autonomy in end-of-life decision making in modern Korean society.现代韩国社会临终决策中对自主权的偏好。
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Mar;22(2):228-36. doi: 10.1177/0969733014523168. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore.界定新加坡接受麻醉患者共同决策的合理患者标准及偏好。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2.
7
The seriously ill hospitalized patient: preferred role in end-of-life decision making?重症住院患者:在临终决策中更倾向的角色?
J Crit Care. 2003 Mar;18(1):3-10. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2003.YJCRC2.
8
Desire for Information and Preference for Participation in Treatment Decisions in Patients With Cancer Presenting to the Department of General Surgery in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.印度一家三级护理医院普通外科收治的癌症患者对信息的需求及参与治疗决策的偏好
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-10. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00144.
9
Discussing life expectancy with surgical patients: do patients want to know and how should this information be delivered?与外科手术患者讨论预期寿命:患者想知道吗?以及该如何传递这一信息?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Jun 15;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-24.
10
Preference for shared decision-making among Arabic-speaking people with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study.阿拉伯语慢性病患者对共同决策的偏好:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e058084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058084.

本文引用的文献

1
Communicating with patients and families about illness progression and end of life: a review of studies using direct observation of clinical practice.与患者及其家属就疾病进展和临终事宜进行沟通:采用临床实践直接观察法的研究综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 8;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00876-2.
2
Patients as team members: Factors affecting involvement in treatment decisions from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition.患者作为团队成员:从慢性病患者的角度出发影响其参与治疗决策的因素。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):138-148. doi: 10.1111/hex.13358. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.
医院中从政策到实践的共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.
4
How Do Patients with Life-Limiting Illness and Caregivers Want End-Of-Life Prognostic Information Delivered? A Pilot Study.患有危及生命疾病的患者及其护理人员希望如何获得临终预后信息?一项试点研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;9(7):784. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070784.
5
Prognostic information, goals of care, and code status decision-making among older patients.老年患者的预后信息、护理目标及代码状态决策
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):2025-2028. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17080. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
6
The Importance of Prognostication: Impact of Prognostic Predictions, Disclosures, Awareness, and Acceptance on Patient Outcomes.预后的重要性:预后预测、告知、意识和接受对患者结局的影响。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021 Jan 11;22(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-00810-3.
7
Training for difficult conversations and breaking bad news over the phone in the emergency department.在急诊科进行困难对话和电话中传达坏消息的培训。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Feb;38(2):151-154. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210141. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Health Information Preferences and Curability Beliefs Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者的健康信息偏好与可治愈性信念
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jan;61(1):121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.023. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Preferred Medium of Receiving Diagnostic News Depending on Patients' Perception of Their Health Status (Healthy or Sick).根据患者对自身健康状况(健康或患病)的认知,接收诊断信息的首选媒介。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 May 29;14:903-915. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S247726. eCollection 2020.
10
Receptivity of Hospitalized Older Adults and Family Caregivers to Prognostic Information about Aging, Injury, and Frailty: A Qualitative Study.住院老年患者及其家庭照顾者对衰老、损伤和虚弱预后信息的接受度:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103602. Epub 2020 May 22.