Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychopathology, Institute of Psychology, University of Lodz, al. Rodziny Scheiblerów 2, 90-128 Lodz, Poland.
Babinski Memorial Hospital, ul. Aleksandrowska 159, 91-229 Lodz, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031921.
Mental health deterioration in young adults in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic is being increasingly studied. It is clear that the psychological consequences of the pandemic will be evident for many years, especially among the younger generation, who did not have time to acquire adaptive coping strategies before the outbreak of COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to assess the condition of the mental health of students at Polish universities after two years of the pandemic. The types of coping strategies used by the respondents to deal with stress were also evaluated in order to establish which of them could have a beneficial effect on the psyche of young people.
This study included 721 participants (age [years]: M = 25.7, SD = 5.3; 269 (37.2%) males) recruited using snowball sampling from students at two universities in Lodz, Poland, and full-time doctoral students from across Poland (phase I of the study was conducted in March 2019 ( = 352); phase II of the study was conducted in April 2022 ( = 369)). The following tools were used in this study: The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) by D. Goldberg, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), and the Inventory for Measuring Coping with Stress (Mini-COPE) by Carver et al. Pearson's chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression were used in the statistical analysis.
The results detailing the condition of the mental health of the subjects, as measured using GHQ-28, were significantly worse in the group surveyed after two years of the pandemic than the results of the survey conducted in March 2019 (adjusted odds ratio for GHQ-28 ≥ 5: 3.66, 95%CI 2.12-6.30, < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were seen for each of the subscales of the GHQ-28 questionnaire. Most often, the subjects complained of anxiety symptoms and sleep disorders, in addition to somatic symptoms. The risk factors for worsening mental health included female (odds ratio 1.70, 95%CI 1.20-2.40, = 0.003) and professional inactivity (odds ratio 1.55, 95%CI 1.04-2.31, = 0.031). On the other hand, the ages of the people surveyed, their relationship status, whether they had children, or the type of university they attended all proved to be insignificant. The following coping strategies had a positive impact on the mental health of the respondents: positive reframing ( = -2.951; = 0.003) and seeking emotional support ( = -2.351; = 0.019). In contrast, strategies such as self-distraction ( = 2.785; = 0.005), denial ( = 2.948; = 0.003), venting ( = 2.337; = 0.019), self-blame ( = 5.511; < 0.001) and behavioral disengagement ( = 4.004; < 0.001) were associated with poorer mental health among the respondents.
越来越多的研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行后,年轻人的心理健康状况恶化。很明显,大流行的心理后果将在许多年内显现出来,尤其是在年轻一代,他们在 COVID-19 爆发之前没有时间获得适应应对策略。本研究的目的是评估波兰大学学生在大流行两年后的心理健康状况。还评估了受访者使用的应对压力的策略类型,以便确定哪些策略对年轻人的心理有有益的影响。
这项研究包括 721 名参与者(年龄[岁]:M = 25.7,SD = 5.3;男性 269 人(37.2%)),通过滚雪球抽样从波兰罗兹的两所大学的学生和波兰各地的全日制博士生中招募(第一阶段研究于 2019 年 3 月进行(n = 352);第二阶段研究于 2022 年 4 月进行(n = 369))。本研究使用了以下工具:D. Goldberg 的一般健康问卷(GHQ-28)、感知压力量表(PSS-10)和 Carver 等人的压力应对量表(Mini-COPE)。在统计分析中使用了 Pearson 卡方检验和多变量逻辑回归。
详细描述了使用 GHQ-28 测量的受试者心理健康状况的结果,在大流行两年后接受调查的受试者中,明显比 2019 年 3 月进行的调查结果更差(GHQ-28≥5 的调整优势比:3.66,95%CI 2.12-6.30,<0.001)。在 GHQ-28 问卷的每个子量表中都看到了统计学上的显著差异。大多数受试者除了躯体症状外,还抱怨焦虑症状和睡眠障碍。心理健康状况恶化的危险因素包括女性(优势比 1.70,95%CI 1.20-2.40,=0.003)和职业不活跃(优势比 1.55,95%CI 1.04-2.31,=0.031)。另一方面,被调查者的年龄、他们的关系状况、是否有孩子或他们所上的大学类型都被证明是无关紧要的。以下应对策略对受访者的心理健康有积极影响:积极重新评估(=-2.951;=0.003)和寻求情感支持(=-2.351;=0.019)。相反,自我分散注意力(=2.785;=0.005)、否认(=2.948;=0.003)、发泄(=2.337;=0.019)、自责(=5.511;<0.001)和行为脱离(=4.004;<0.001)等策略与受访者心理健康状况恶化有关。