• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于整合机器学习决策树模型评估非瓣膜性心房颤动患者应用不同剂量达比加群的风险。

Integrated Machine Learning Decision Tree Model for Risk Evaluation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation When Taking Different Doses of Dabigatran.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Business Administration, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan.

Department of Neurology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24352, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032359.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032359
PMID:36767726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9915180/
Abstract

The new generation of nonvitamin K antagonists are broadly applied for stroke prevention due to their notable efficacy and safety. Our study aimed to develop a suggestive utilization of dabigatran through an integrated machine learning (ML) decision-tree model. Participants taking different doses of dabigatran in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy trial were included in our analysis and defined as the 110 mg and 150 mg groups. The proposed scheme integrated ML methods, namely naive Bayes, random forest (RF), classification and regression tree (CART), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), which were used to identify the essential variables for predicting vascular events in the 110 mg group and bleeding in the 150 mg group. RF (0.764 for 110 mg; 0.747 for 150 mg) and XGBoost (0.708 for 110 mg; 0.761 for 150 mg) had better area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values than logistic regression (benchmark model; 0.683 for 110 mg; 0.739 for 150 mg). We then selected the top ten important variables as internal nodes of the CART decision tree. The two best CART models with ten important variables output tree-shaped rules for predicting vascular events in the 110 mg group and bleeding in the 150 mg group. Our model can be used to provide more visualized and interpretable suggestive rules to clinicians managing NVAF patients who are taking dabigatran.

摘要

新一代非维生素 K 拮抗剂由于其显著的疗效和安全性,被广泛应用于卒中预防。我们旨在通过整合机器学习(ML)决策树模型,为达比加群的合理使用提供建议。我们的分析纳入了接受不同剂量达比加群治疗的随机评价长期抗凝治疗试验(Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy trial)参与者,并将其定义为 110mg 和 150mg 组。所提出的方案整合了 ML 方法,包括朴素贝叶斯、随机森林(Random Forest,RF)、分类回归树(Classification and Regression Tree,CART)和极端梯度提升(Extreme Gradient Boosting,XGBoost),用于识别预测 110mg 组血管事件和 150mg 组出血的关键变量。RF(110mg 组为 0.764;150mg 组为 0.747)和 XGBoost(110mg 组为 0.708;150mg 组为 0.761)的曲线下接收者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)面积值优于逻辑回归(基准模型;110mg 组为 0.683;150mg 组为 0.739)。然后,我们选择前十个重要变量作为 CART 决策树的内部节点。具有十个重要变量的两个最佳 CART 模型输出了预测 110mg 组血管事件和 150mg 组出血的树状规则。我们的模型可用于为管理接受达比加群治疗的 NVAF 患者的临床医生提供更可视化和可解释的建议规则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/321656139791/ijerph-20-02359-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/b308452e4056/ijerph-20-02359-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/bf9e6ac19d76/ijerph-20-02359-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/eb562c1d7f94/ijerph-20-02359-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/abbf7d45af94/ijerph-20-02359-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/7dab427725b9/ijerph-20-02359-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/321656139791/ijerph-20-02359-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/b308452e4056/ijerph-20-02359-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/bf9e6ac19d76/ijerph-20-02359-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/eb562c1d7f94/ijerph-20-02359-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/abbf7d45af94/ijerph-20-02359-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/7dab427725b9/ijerph-20-02359-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d034/9915180/321656139791/ijerph-20-02359-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrated Machine Learning Decision Tree Model for Risk Evaluation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation When Taking Different Doses of Dabigatran.基于整合机器学习决策树模型评估非瓣膜性心房颤动患者应用不同剂量达比加群的风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032359.
2
Important Risk Factors in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Taking Dabigatran Using Integrated Machine Learning Scheme-A Post Hoc Analysis.使用集成机器学习方案对服用达比加群的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的重要危险因素——一项事后分析
J Pers Med. 2022 May 6;12(5):756. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050756.
3
Association between activated partial thromboplastin time, age and bleeding events in NVAF patients receiving dabigatran.接受达比加群的非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)患者活化部分凝血活酶时间、年龄与出血事件之间的关联。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;75(3):321-328. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2583-5. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
5
A comparison of the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in a large healthcare system.在大型医疗体系中比较达比加群酯和华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的安全性和有效性。
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov 25;114(6):1290-8. doi: 10.1160/TH15-06-0453. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
6
Exploratory Data Mining Techniques (Decision Tree Models) for Examining the Impact of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus: Machine Learning Approach.探索性数据挖掘技术(决策树模型)在研究基于互联网的认知行为疗法对耳鸣影响中的应用:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 2;23(11):e28999. doi: 10.2196/28999.
7
Prediction model of atrial fibrillation recurrence after Cox-Maze IV procedure in patients with chronic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation based on machine learning algorithm.基于机器学习算法的慢性瓣膜病合并心房颤动患者 Cox-Maze IV 术后心房颤动复发预测模型。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jul 28;48(7):995-1007. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230018.
8
Machine learning-based risk models for procedural complications of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.基于机器学习的房颤射频消融术操作并发症风险模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02347-5.
9
Peripheral leukocyte count and risk of bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation taking dabigatran: a real-world study.服用达比加群的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的外周白细胞计数与出血风险:一项真实世界研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Sep 20;132(18):2150-2156. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000423.
10
Machine Learning for Predicting Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Scoping Review of Current Literature.机器学习预测心脏手术后心房颤动:当前文献的范围综述。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 15;209:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.079. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating Health Data-Driven Machine Learning Algorithms to Evaluate Risk Factors of Early Stage Hypertension at Different Levels of HDL and LDL Cholesterol.整合健康数据驱动的机器学习算法,以评估不同高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平下早期高血压的风险因素。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 14;12(8):1965. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081965.
2
An Integrated Machine Learning Scheme for Predicting Mammographic Anomalies in High-Risk Individuals Using Questionnaire-Based Predictors.基于问卷预测因子的高危人群乳腺异常的集成机器学习预测方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;19(15):9756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159756.
3
Incidence of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant prescribing in England, 2009 to 2019: A cohort study.
2009 年至 2019 年英格兰非瓣膜性心房颤动的发病率和口服抗凝药物处方:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jun 7;19(6):e1004003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004003. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Important Risk Factors in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Taking Dabigatran Using Integrated Machine Learning Scheme-A Post Hoc Analysis.使用集成机器学习方案对服用达比加群的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的重要危险因素——一项事后分析
J Pers Med. 2022 May 6;12(5):756. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050756.
5
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
6
Deep-learning model for predicting the survival of rectal adenocarcinoma patients based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果分析的直肠腺癌患者生存预测的深度学习模型。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 25;22(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09217-9.
7
Utilization of Decision Tree Algorithms for Supporting the Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission of Myasthenia Gravis: A Machine Learning-Based Approach.利用决策树算法支持重症肌无力患者入住重症监护病房的预测:一种基于机器学习的方法。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 2;12(1):32. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010032.
8
A Machine-Learning-Based System for Prediction of Cardiovascular and Chronic Respiratory Diseases.基于机器学习的心血管和慢性呼吸系统疾病预测系统。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 1;2021:2621655. doi: 10.1155/2021/2621655. eCollection 2021.
9
Health Data-Driven Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to Risk Indicators Assessment for Chronic Kidney Disease.应用于慢性肾脏病风险指标评估的健康数据驱动型机器学习算法
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Oct 27;14:4401-4412. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S319405. eCollection 2021.
10
Development and validation of new screening tool for predicting dementia risk in community-dwelling older Japanese adults.开发和验证新的筛查工具,以预测社区居住的日本老年成年人的痴呆风险。
J Transl Med. 2021 Oct 26;19(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03121-9.