• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麦生产的生命周期评估:来自塞浦路斯的案例研究。

LCA of Barley Production: A Case Study from Cyprus.

机构信息

Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Engineering Sustainability, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, Open University of Cyprus, Giannou Kranidioti 33, Latsia, Nicosia 2220, Cyprus.

Department of Agrobiotechnology, Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia 1516, Cyprus.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032417.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032417
PMID:36767784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916166/
Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions (i.e., carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) produced by agriculture contribute to global warming and climate change. Various practices followed by farmers in different environmental conditions contribute to the increase in the phenomena, and there is a need for immediate measures. The current study examines the environmental impact of barley production under rain-fed conditions in Cyprus. For this, four different nutrient management scenarios were investigated in order to evaluate the environmental performance of crop production, namely: (1) Nitrogen (20%), Phosphorous (20%), Potassium (10%); (2) Nitrogen (20%), Phosphorous (20%), Potassium (10%) and manure; (3) Nitrogen (25%), Phosphorous (10%), Potassium (0%); and (4) Nitrogen (25%), Phosphorous (10%), Potassium (0%) and manure. Data were collected from two different areas of Cyprus (Nicosia and Larnaca) through on-site visits and questionnaires. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used as a method to quantify environmental impacts which were categorized into six impact categories: (i) acidification potential (AP), (ii) eutrophication potential (EP), (iii) global warming potential (GWP), (iv) ozone depletion potential (ODP), (v) photochemical, ozone creation potential (POCP), and (vi) terrestrial ecotoxicity (TAETP). LCA was used with system boundaries from field to harvest and a functional unit (FU) of one bale of hay. Research results showed that the addition of manure increased values in all impact categories. Comparing scenarios without manure (1 and 3) and with manure (2 and 4), the main process which contributed to GWP was field preparation, which resulted in 3 t CO-Eq∙FU and 46.96 t CO-Eq∙FU, respectively. Furthermore, the highest contribution of sub-processes to GWP (kg CO-Eq∙FU) was machinery maintenance (scenarios 2 and 4). The potential to reduce environmental impacts from barley and moreover, to mitigate the footprint of the agriculture sector in Cyprus is proposed by changing existing practices such as decreasing fuel consumption by agricultural machinery, and monitoring fertilizing and seeding. Conclusively, the carbon footprint of barley can be decreased through the improvement of nutrient management and cropping practices.

摘要

农业产生的温室气体排放(如二氧化碳、甲烷、氧化亚氮)导致了全球变暖与气候变化。不同环境条件下的农民所采取的各种做法加剧了这一现象,因此需要立即采取措施。本研究考察了塞浦路斯雨养条件下大麦生产的环境影响。为此,研究调查了四种不同的养分管理方案,以评估作物生产的环境表现,即:(1) 氮(20%)、磷(20%)、钾(10%);(2) 氮(20%)、磷(20%)、钾(10%)和粪肥;(3) 氮(25%)、磷(10%)、钾(0%);以及 (4) 氮(25%)、磷(10%)、钾(0%)和粪肥。数据通过现场访问和问卷调查从塞浦路斯的两个不同地区(尼科西亚和拉纳卡)收集。生命周期评估 (LCA) 被用作量化环境影响的方法,这些影响被分为六个影响类别:(i) 酸化潜力 (AP),(ii) 富营养化潜力 (EP),(iii) 全球变暖潜力 (GWP),(iv) 臭氧消耗潜力 (ODP),(v) 光化学臭氧生成潜力 (POCP),和 (vi) 陆地生态毒性 (TAETP)。LCA 的系统边界从田间到收获,功能单位 (FU) 为一捆干草。研究结果表明,粪肥的添加增加了所有影响类别的数值。与没有粪肥的方案(1 和 3)相比,添加粪肥的方案(2 和 4),对 GWP 贡献最大的过程是田间准备,分别产生 3 t CO-Eq·FU 和 46.96 t CO-Eq·FU。此外,对 GWP(kg CO-Eq·FU)贡献最大的子过程是机械维护(方案 2 和 4)。通过改变现有的做法,如减少农业机械的燃料消耗,并监测施肥和播种,可以提出减少大麦的环境影响并减轻塞浦路斯农业部门足迹的建议。总之,通过改进养分管理和种植实践,可以减少大麦的碳足迹。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/2d3d0f1163c0/ijerph-20-02417-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/80a455df1201/ijerph-20-02417-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/0b9052de28e2/ijerph-20-02417-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/62a265a5cd10/ijerph-20-02417-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/6ccbcc5258c3/ijerph-20-02417-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/21e46f5bedbc/ijerph-20-02417-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/5e61ac278a88/ijerph-20-02417-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/2d3d0f1163c0/ijerph-20-02417-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/80a455df1201/ijerph-20-02417-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/0b9052de28e2/ijerph-20-02417-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/62a265a5cd10/ijerph-20-02417-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/6ccbcc5258c3/ijerph-20-02417-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/21e46f5bedbc/ijerph-20-02417-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/5e61ac278a88/ijerph-20-02417-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5494/9916166/2d3d0f1163c0/ijerph-20-02417-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
LCA of Barley Production: A Case Study from Cyprus.大麦生产的生命周期评估:来自塞浦路斯的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032417.
2
Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment.精准饲养作为减少猪生产系统环境足迹的工具:生命周期评估。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae225.
3
Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study.实施适当的指标来评估畜牧业温室气体排放:国家案例研究。
Animal. 2022 Oct;16(10):100638. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100638. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Net global warming potential index rather than soil carbon stock change could provide better understanding of the carbon balance in soil systems.净全球变暖潜势指数而非土壤碳储量变化可以更好地理解土壤系统中的碳平衡。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):6572-6583. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31602-5. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
5
Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?有机农产品和传统农产品的环境影响——生命周期评估能否捕捉到这些差异?
J Environ Manage. 2015 Feb 1;149:193-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
6
Environmental implications of stored cattle slurry treatment with sulphuric acid and biochar: A life cycle assessment approach.用硫酸和生物炭处理储存的牛粪浆的环境影响:生命周期评估方法。
Environ Res. 2021 Mar;194:110640. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110640. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
[Field greenhouse gas emission characteristics and carbon footprint of ratoon rice].再生稻田间温室气体排放特征及碳足迹
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 May;33(5):1340-1351. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.013.
8
Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.农民能否通过粮食、燃料和饲料的综合生产来减轻环境影响?具有绿色生物精炼厂的综合混合作物-牲畜系统的 consequential 生命周期评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 1;619-620:127-143. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.082. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Impact of management strategies on the global warming potential at the cropping system level.管理策略对种植系统层面的全球变暖潜势的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 15;490:921-33. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.070. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
10
Greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential from biofuel cropping systems fertilized with mineral and organic nitrogen sources.生物燃料种植系统中,使用矿物和有机氮源施肥产生的温室气体排放和全球变暖潜势。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 10;729:138767. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138767. Epub 2020 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and demolition waste framework of circular economy: A mini review.建筑和拆除废物的循环经济框架:小型综述。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Dec;41(12):1728-1740. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231190804. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Life Cycle Assessment on Agricultural Production: A Mini Review on Methodology, Application, and Challenges.农业生产的生命周期评估:方法、应用和挑战的小型综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;19(16):9817. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169817.
2
Life cycle assessment as decision support tool for water reuse in agriculture irrigation.生命周期评估作为农业灌溉中水回用的决策支持工具。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 25;836:155486. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155486. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Revisiting future extreme precipitation trends in the Mediterranean.
重新审视地中海地区未来极端降水趋势。
Weather Clim Extrem. 2021 Dec;34:100380. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100380.
4
An ex ante life cycle assessment of wheat with high biological nitrification inhibition capacity.具有高生物硝化抑制能力的小麦的事前生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(5):7153-7169. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16132-2. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain; a review of the evidence.气候变化对畜牧食品供应链的影响;证据综述
Glob Food Sec. 2021 Mar;28:100488. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100488.
6
LCA of a Membrane Bioreactor Compared to Activated Sludge System for Municipal Wastewater Treatment.用于城市污水处理的膜生物反应器与活性污泥系统的生命周期评估
Membranes (Basel). 2020 Dec 14;10(12):421. doi: 10.3390/membranes10120421.
7
Cradle to grave environmental impact evaluation of the consumption of potato and tomato products.对食用土豆和番茄制品的全生命周期环境影响评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 1;758:143662. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143662. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
8
The effect of chemical and organic N inputs on NO emission from rain-fed crops in Eastern Mediterranean.化学和有机氮输入对东地中海雨养作物中一氧化二氮排放的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 15;270:110755. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110755. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
9
Valorization of agricultural wastes could improve soil fertility and mitigate soil direct NO emissions.农业废弃物的利用可以提高土壤肥力,减少土壤直接氮排放。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Nov 15;250:109389. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109389. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
The effects of different soil nutrient management schemes in nitrogen cycling.不同土壤养分管理方案对氮循环的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Aug 1;243:168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.115. Epub 2019 May 13.