Suppr超能文献

《斯坦福时间观量表的意大利验证及其与三个时间观量表的比较》。

The Italian Validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and Its Comparison with Three Time Perspective Inventories.

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2590. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032590.

Abstract

The Zimbardo time perspective inventory (ZTPI) is the most well-known and widely used measure of time perspective. However, the assessment of the psychometric properties of the ZTPI reveals several problems, and various short versions have been proposed to overcome these problems. In a large Italian sample (N = 2295; 1326 women; age range 18-74 years), the present study aimed to test a short version of the ZTPI (ZTPI-16) defined by high frequency items (i.e., "good" items), reviewing the items composition of previous alternative short versions of the scale. Beyond the assessment of the factorial structure of this new short ZTPI, we compared the ZTPI-16 to the original ZTPI (ZTPI-56) and another already validated version of the ZTPI in the Italian context, such as Zimbardo's Stanford time perspective inventory (ZTPI-22), the short version of the ZTPI (ZTPI-30), and the ZTPI-36 proposed analyzing the data from 24 countries. The results confirmed the psychometric problems of the ZTPI-56, whereas the ZTPI-16 reported adequate structural validity and reliability. Moderate-to-strong correlations between same temporal subscales in different ZTPI versions were also found. These data suggest that the review of the "good" items is a new direction in the development of ZTPI versions with good psychometric properties and comparable data among cultures.

摘要

津巴多时间透视量表(ZTPI)是最著名和广泛使用的时间透视测量工具。然而,对 ZTPI 的心理测量特性的评估揭示了一些问题,并且已经提出了各种简短版本来克服这些问题。在一个大型的意大利样本中(N=2295;1326 名女性;年龄范围 18-74 岁),本研究旨在测试一个由高频项目(即“好”项目)定义的 ZTPI 的简短版本(ZTPI-16),同时回顾了之前该量表的其他简短版本的项目组成部分。除了评估这种新的简短 ZTPI 的因子结构外,我们还将 ZTPI-16 与原始 ZTPI(ZTPI-56)和意大利语背景下另一个已经验证的 ZTPI 版本(如津巴多的斯坦福时间透视量表(ZTPI-22)、ZTPI 的简短版本(ZTPI-30)和通过分析来自 24 个国家的数据提出的 ZTPI-36)进行了比较。结果证实了 ZTPI-56 的心理测量问题,而 ZTPI-16 则报告了足够的结构有效性和可靠性。在不同的 ZTPI 版本中,相同时间子量表之间也存在中等至强相关。这些数据表明,对“好”项目的审查是 ZTPI 版本发展的一个新方向,这些版本具有良好的心理测量特性和文化间可比的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1d/9915386/44c68b46b0a5/ijerph-20-02590-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验