• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国不孕治疗女性的应激应对类型和特征。

Types and Characteristics of Stress Coping in Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment in Korea.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Munhwa-ro 266, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Republic of Korea.

Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Pilmundae-ro 309, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032648.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032648
PMID:36768010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9915192/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics and predictors of types of stress coping in women undergoing infertility treatment. The cross-sectional study included 120 women who were receiving infertility treatment at infertility hospitals. Self-report questionnaires were used to measure. K-means cluster analysis and multinomial logistic regression were used to examine the characteristics and predictors of stress-coping types. Out of all the women undergoing infertility treatment who completed a self-report survey, 30.8% had a weak mixed coping type, 35.9% had a strong mixed coping type, and 33.3% had a passive coping type. The strong mixed treatment type was compared to weak mixed treatment type, with the following results: infertility adaptation (OR = 17.71, < 0.000), spousal support (OR = 4.50, = 0.021), infertility counseling experience (OR = 7.14, = 0.010). Comparing the strong mixed coping type with the passive coping type, resilience (OR = 9.11, < 0.000) was shown. It is necessary to strengthen resilience and provide a receptive attitude and spousal support to women undergoing infertility adaptation to help them relieve stress and develop functional coping.

摘要

本研究旨在识别接受不孕治疗的女性的压力应对类型的特征和预测因素。这项横断面研究纳入了 120 名在不孕医院接受不孕治疗的女性。采用自我报告问卷进行测量。采用 K-均值聚类分析和多项逻辑回归分析来研究压力应对类型的特征和预测因素。在完成自我报告调查的所有接受不孕治疗的女性中,30.8%的人表现出较弱的混合应对类型,35.9%的人表现出较强的混合应对类型,33.3%的人表现出被动应对类型。将强混合治疗类型与弱混合治疗类型进行比较,结果如下:不孕适应(OR=17.71,<0.000)、配偶支持(OR=4.50,=0.021)、不孕咨询经验(OR=7.14,=0.010)。将强混合应对类型与被动应对类型进行比较,表现出韧性(OR=9.11,<0.000)。有必要加强女性的韧性,并提供接受的态度和配偶支持,帮助她们缓解压力并发展功能性应对方式。

相似文献

1
Types and Characteristics of Stress Coping in Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment in Korea.韩国不孕治疗女性的应激应对类型和特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032648.
2
Psychological experience and coping strategies of patients in the Northeast US delaying care for infertility during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国东北部 COVID-19 大流行期间,不孕症患者延迟治疗的心理体验和应对策略。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Feb 23;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00721-4.
3
Religious Women's Coping with Infertility: Do Culturally Adapted Religious Coping Strategies Contribute to Well-Being and Health?宗教女性应对不孕症:文化适应的宗教应对策略是否有助于幸福和健康?
Int J Behav Med. 2019 Apr;26(2):154-164. doi: 10.1007/s12529-018-9757-5.
4
The association between stressful life events and perceived quality of life among women attending infertility treatments: the moderating role of coping strategies and perceived couple's dyadic adjustment.应激性生活事件与接受不孕治疗的女性生活质量感知之间的关系:应对策略和感知夫妻关系调节的调节作用。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):1548. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7925-4.
5
Predictors of psychological distress in patients starting IVF treatment: infertility-specific versus general psychological characteristics.IVF 治疗起始患者心理困扰的预测因素:不孕特异性与一般心理特征。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1471-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq030. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
6
Occupational social class, coping responses and infertility-related stress of women undergoing infertility treatment.职业社会阶层、应对方式与接受不孕治疗女性的不孕相关压力。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Jul;20(13-14):1971-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03696.x. Epub 2011 May 12.
7
A dyadic mediation study on social support, coping, and stress among couples starting fertility treatment.夫妇接受生育治疗过程中社会支持、应对方式和压力的双重中介研究。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):315-326. doi: 10.1037/fam0000502. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
8
Comparing infertility-related stress, coping, and quality of life among assisted reproductive technology and non-assisted reproductive technology treatments.比较辅助生殖技术和非辅助生殖技术治疗的不孕相关压力、应对方式和生活质量。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2023 Dec;26(5):1248-1255. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2022.2163465. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
9
Infertility-Related Stress and Psychological Health Outcomes in Infertile Couples Undergoing Medical Treatments: Testing a Multi-dimensional Model.不孕相关压力与接受医学治疗的不孕夫妇的心理健康结局:检验多维模型。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Dec;27(4):662-676. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09653-z.
10
Does infertility cause marital benefit? An epidemiological study of 2250 women and men in fertility treatment.不孕症会带来婚姻益处吗?一项针对2250名接受生育治疗的男女的流行病学研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Dec;59(3):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.015. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of mindfulness-based nursing support on the psychosocial status of women receiving infertility treatment: a randomized controlled trial.基于正念的护理支持对接受不孕症治疗女性心理社会状况的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03659-6.
2
Psychoemotional and Financial Impact on Infertile Women in a Romanian Population.罗马尼亚人群中不孕女性的心理情绪和经济影响。
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Sep;19(3):536-542. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.3.536.
3
[Factors Influencing the Intention for Continual Fertility Treatments by the Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology Procedures: A Cross-Sectional Study].[影响接受辅助生殖技术程序的女性持续生育治疗意愿的因素:一项横断面研究]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024 Feb;54(1):59-72. doi: 10.4040/jkan.23095.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Influencing Infertility-related Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Focusing on Depression and Resilience.影响接受辅助生殖技术女性不孕相关生活质量的因素:聚焦抑郁与心理弹性
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2017 Jun;23(2):117-125. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2017.23.2.117. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Effects of Irrational Parenthood Cognition, Family Support, and Resilience on Depression of Infertile Women.不合理生育认知、家庭支持及心理韧性对不孕女性抑郁的影响
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2019 Mar;25(1):60-72. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2019.25.1.60. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
The Relationship between Fatigue, Health-Promoting Behavior, and Depression among Infertile Women.不孕女性的疲劳、健康促进行为与抑郁之间的关系。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2019 Sep;25(3):273-284. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2019.25.3.273. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
[Development of a Coping Scale for Infertility-Women (CSI-W)].[不孕症女性应对量表(CSI-W)的编制]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020 Oct;50(5):671-685. doi: 10.4040/jkan.20038.
5
The Quality of Marriage Index (QMI): a validation study in infertile patients.婚姻质量指数(QMI):一项针对不孕患者的验证研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 14;12(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4438-2.
6
Resilience acts as a moderator in the relationship between infertility-related stress and fertility quality of life among women with infertility: a cross-sectional study.韧性在不孕相关压力与不孕女性生育生活质量的关系中充当调节因素:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1099-8.
7
Impairments in life satisfaction in infertility: Associations with perceived stress, affectivity, partnership quality, social support and the desire to have a child.不孕不育对生活满意度的影响:与感知压力、情感、伴侣关系质量、社会支持和生育愿望的关系。
Behav Med. 2020 Apr-Jun;46(2):130-141. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2018.1564897. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
8
Counseling-supportive interventions to decrease infertile women's perceived stress: A systematic review.减轻不孕女性感知压力的咨询支持性干预措施:一项系统综述。
Electron Physician. 2017 Jun 25;9(6):4694-4702. doi: 10.19082/4694. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
Anxiety and depression in women undergoing infertility treatment.接受不孕症治疗的女性的焦虑和抑郁。
Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(2):109-112. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0019.
10
Does infertility history affect the emotional adjustment of couples undergoing assisted reproduction? the mediating role of the importance of parenthood.不孕史是否会影响接受辅助生殖的夫妇的情绪调适?为人父母重要性的中介作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 May;21(2):302-17. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12169. Epub 2015 Nov 2.