• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

企业安全文化成熟度评价模型研究。

Research on the Maturity Evaluation Model of Enterprise Safety Culture.

机构信息

School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.

Beijing Institute of Electronic System Engineering, Beijing 100854, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032664.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032664
PMID:36768030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916200/
Abstract

To regulate the safety behavior of employees and improve the occupational safety level of enterprises. Based on the perspective of safety culture, this paper designed an index system based on the four dimensions of safety concept, system, behavior, and physical culture, and it explored a new quantitative assessment method of safety culture level by introducing the concept of maturity into the evaluation of safety culture using the grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Combining the characteristics of enterprise safety culture, safety culture was divided into five levels, including original level, starting level, development level, completion level, and leading level, and the maturity model of enterprise safety culture was established. Finally, taking an enterprise to be evaluated as an example, the evaluation steps and application of evaluation results were introduced. The results showed that the evaluation model of enterprise safety culture maturity constructed in this paper provides systematic measurement indexes and scientific evaluation methods for evaluating the safety culture maturity of enterprises.

摘要

为规范员工安全行为,提高企业职业安全水平。本文基于安全文化视角,设计了一个由安全理念、制度、行为和物质文化四个维度构成的指标体系,并引入成熟度概念,采用灰色模糊综合评价法对安全文化评价进行定量评估,探索了一种新的安全文化水平定量评估方法。结合企业安全文化的特点,将安全文化分为原始级、起步级、发展级、完善级和引领级五个等级,建立了企业安全文化成熟度模型。最后,以被评价企业为例,介绍了评价步骤和评价结果的应用。结果表明,本文构建的企业安全文化成熟度评价模型为评价企业安全文化成熟度提供了系统的度量指标和科学的评价方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94f/9916200/0804c7e35646/ijerph-20-02664-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94f/9916200/fc94cfbb4879/ijerph-20-02664-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94f/9916200/cb4f1d8a4844/ijerph-20-02664-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94f/9916200/0804c7e35646/ijerph-20-02664-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94f/9916200/fc94cfbb4879/ijerph-20-02664-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94f/9916200/cb4f1d8a4844/ijerph-20-02664-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94f/9916200/0804c7e35646/ijerph-20-02664-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the Maturity Evaluation Model of Enterprise Safety Culture.企业安全文化成熟度评价模型研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032664.
2
Occupational Health Development and Safety Management of Enterprise Employees Based on the Perspective of Sustainable Environment.基于可持续环境视角的企业员工职业健康发展与安全管理
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;2022:3792356. doi: 10.1155/2022/3792356. eCollection 2022.
3
Investigation of enterprise economic management model based on fuzzy logic algorithm.基于模糊逻辑算法的企业经济管理模式研究
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 9;9(8):e19016. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19016. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Wastewater treatment evaluation for enterprises based on fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation: a case study in industrial park in Taihu Basin, China.基于模糊层次分析法综合评价的企业废水处理评估——以中国太湖流域工业园区为例
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 27;5(1):907. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2523-8. eCollection 2016.
5
Comprehensive Evaluation System of Occupational Hazard Prevention and Control in Iron and Steel Enterprises Based on A Modified Delphi Technique.基于改进 Delphi 技术的钢铁企业职业病危害防控综合评价体系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 20;17(2):667. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020667.
6
Occupational health and safety management in polish enterprises implementing total quality management systems.实施全面质量管理体系的波兰企业中的职业健康与安全管理
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2000;Spec No:85-101. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2000.11105110.
7
Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Management of Listed Companies in China's Energy Industry Based on the Combined Weight-Cloud Model: From the Perspective of FPE Information Disclosure.基于组合赋权-云模型的中国能源业上市公司职业健康安全管理评价——来自 FPE 信息披露视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148313.
8
Comprehensive Evaluation of University Safety Culture Construction Level Based on "2-4" Model.基于“2-4”模型的高校安全文化建设水平综合评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316145.
9
Optimization of Work Environment and Community Labor Health Based on Digital Model-Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries.基于数字模型的工作环境和社区劳工健康优化——来自发展中国家的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013114.
10
[A simplified occupational health and safety management system designed for small enterprises. Initial validation results].[为小企业设计的简化职业健康与安全管理体系。初步验证结果]
Med Lav. 2009;100 Suppl 1:52-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Contributory Factors of Confined Space Accidents Using Accident Investigation Reports and Semistructured Interviews.利用事故调查报告和半结构化访谈探究受限空间事故的促成因素。
Saf Health Work. 2019 Sep;10(3):305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
2
Safety Culture: An Integration of Existing Models and a Framework for Understanding Its Development.安全文化:现有模型的整合及发展理解框架。
Hum Factors. 2021 Feb;63(1):88-110. doi: 10.1177/0018720819868878. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
3
Routes to failure: analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the human factors analysis and classification system.
失败的原因:运用人为因素分析与分类系统对中华民国的41起民航事故进行分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Mar;40(2):426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
4
Associations between errors and contributing factors in aircraft maintenance.飞机维修中差错与促成因素之间的关联。
Hum Factors. 2003 Summer;45(2):186-201. doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.2.186.27244.