• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于地点的政策与碳排放效率:中国革命老根据地的准实验。

Place-Based Policies and Carbon Emission Efficiency: Quasi-Experiment in China's Old Revolutionary Base Areas.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China.

Ji Luan Academy, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;20(3):2677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032677.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032677
PMID:36768043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9915022/
Abstract

Regional imbalance is a typical feature of economic and social development in China, and place-based policies aimed at promoting balanced regional development may bring challenges to low-carbon goals. This study uses the panel data of China's prefecture-level cities from 2003 to 2019 to investigate the impact of place-based policies on carbon emission efficiency using a quasi-experimental method. Results indicate that place-based policies significantly reduce the regional total-factor carbon emission efficiency. The difference-in-differences method based on propensity score matching and entropy balancing matching consistently supports the finding that carbon emission efficiency decreases after policy intervention. Place-based policies lead to a significant decline in capital allocation efficiency but have an insignificant impact on labor allocation efficiency. Moreover, place-based policies result in the expansion of carbon-intensive industries but hinder the progress of the financial technology of financial institutions. Nevertheless, place-based policies do not lead to the deterioration of environmental quality. Among the advantages of these policies are the significant promotion of regional digitization and increased fiscal expenditure on science and technology. Political promotion, carbon regulation, trade policies, and other conditional factors may be optimally designed to promote low-carbon development in the old revolutionary areas.

摘要

区域不平衡是中国经济社会发展的典型特征,旨在促进区域均衡发展的基于地点的政策可能给低碳目标带来挑战。本研究使用中国 2003 年至 2019 年的地级市面板数据,采用准实验方法考察了基于地点的政策对碳排放效率的影响。结果表明,基于地点的政策显著降低了区域全要素碳排放效率。基于倾向得分匹配和熵平衡匹配的双重差分法一致支持政策干预后碳排放效率下降的结论。基于地点的政策导致资本配置效率显著下降,但对劳动力配置效率影响不大。此外,基于地点的政策导致碳密集型产业扩张,但阻碍了金融机构金融科技的进步。然而,基于地点的政策并没有导致环境质量恶化。这些政策的优势包括显著促进了区域数字化和增加了财政科技支出。可以对政治晋升、碳监管、贸易政策等条件因素进行优化设计,以促进老区的低碳发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d1/9915022/a438eabaf743/ijerph-20-02677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d1/9915022/e4a22d577c4e/ijerph-20-02677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d1/9915022/a438eabaf743/ijerph-20-02677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d1/9915022/e4a22d577c4e/ijerph-20-02677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d1/9915022/a438eabaf743/ijerph-20-02677-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Place-Based Policies and Carbon Emission Efficiency: Quasi-Experiment in China's Old Revolutionary Base Areas.基于地点的政策与碳排放效率:中国革命老根据地的准实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;20(3):2677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032677.
2
The role of place-based policies on carbon emission: A quasi-natural experiment from China's old revolutionary development program.基于地点的政策对碳排放的作用:来自中国革命老区发展计划的准自然实验。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 29;9(5):e15964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15964. eCollection 2023 May.
3
How Low-Carbon Pilots Affect Chinese Urban Energy Efficiency: An Explanation from Technological Progress.低碳试点如何影响中国城市能源效率:来自技术进步的解释。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315563.
4
The Effects of Broadband Infrastructure on Carbon Emission Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities in China: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the "Broadband China" Pilot Policy.宽带基础设施对中国资源型城市碳排效率的影响:来自“宽带中国”试点政策的准自然实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 31;19(11):6734. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116734.
5
Spatio-temporal efficiency of fiscal environmental expenditure in reducing CO emissions in China's cities.中国城市财政环境支出在减少碳排放方面的时空效率
J Environ Manage. 2023 May 15;334:117479. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117479. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
6
The impact of green financial policies on carbon emission efficiency: empirical evidence from China.绿色金融政策对碳排放效率的影响:来自中国的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):89521-89534. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28699-z. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
7
Has China's Low-Carbon City Construction Enhanced the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land?中国的低碳城市建设是否提高了城市土地的绿色利用效率?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9844. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169844.
8
Is the "pollution haven hypothesis" valid for China's carbon trading system? A re-examination based on inter-provincial carbon emission transfer.“污染避难所假说”在中国碳交易体系中是否成立?基于省际碳排放转移的再检验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(26):40110-40122. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18737-7. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
9
Spatial effects of carbon emission intensity and regional development in China.中国碳排放强度与区域发展的空间效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(11):14131-14143. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11557-7. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
Does the low carbon transition impact urban resilience? Evidence from China's pilot cities for carbon emission trading.低碳转型是否会影响城市韧性?来自中国碳排放交易试点城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11128-11149. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31903-3. Epub 2024 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the employment in less-developed areas through low-carbon city pilot policy: A study on old revolutionary areas in China.通过低碳城市试点政策促进欠发达地区就业:对中国革命老区的研究
Sci Prog. 2025 Jan-Mar;108(1):368504251320699. doi: 10.1177/00368504251320699.

本文引用的文献

1
Nonlinear and spatial spillover effects of the digital economy on green total factor energy efficiency: evidence from 281 cities in China.数字经济对绿色全要素能源效率的非线性和空间溢出效应:来自中国 281 个城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(34):81896-81916. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22694-6. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Government intervention, market development, and pollution emission efficiency: Evidence from China.政府干预、市场发展与污染排放效率:来自中国的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 25;757:143738. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143738. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
3
The effects of National High-tech Industrial Development Zones on economic development and environmental pollution in China during 2003-2018.
国家高新技术产业开发区对中国 2003-2018 年经济发展和环境污染的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(1):1097-1107. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10553-1. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
4
Impact of fiscal decentralization on firm environmental performance: evidence from a county-level fiscal reform in China.财政分权对企业环境绩效的影响:来自中国县级财政改革的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(29):36147-36159. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09663-7. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Regional carbon imbalance within China: An application of the Kaya-Zenga index.中国区域碳失衡:卡亚-增熵指数的应用。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 15;262:110378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110378. Epub 2020 Mar 6.