• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所肌肉骨骼损伤风险因素筛查工具在降低损伤方面的有效性:系统评价。

The Effectiveness of Workplace Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Factor Screening Tools for Reducing Injury: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.

Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;20(3):2762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032762.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032762
PMID:36768128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916206/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Musculoskeletal injury (MSI) contributes to global health burdens. Effective MSI prevention is necessary. MSI risk factor screening tools can be used by employers to identify and mitigate occupational hazards. Rigorous synthesis of the effectiveness of these tools has not taken place. We synthesized literature on effectiveness of MSI risk factor screening tools for reducing injury through informing prevention interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library (Trials), CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO databases was performed. Included studies required an analytic design, used an MSI risk factor screening tool to inform an intervention in a working-age population and reported an outcome of MSI development, injury or compensation/work absence. Data extraction and study quality rating (Downs and Black criteria) were completed. Studies were sub-categorized as having used a single MSI screening tool (single-tool) to inform an injury prevention intervention or involving multiple simultaneous screening tools (multiple-tool). Study outcomes were synthesized when possible.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles representing fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria. No high-quality studies were identified (maximum Downs and Black score of 19). Studies did not employ previously validated tools but instead, typically, those purpose-built for a single use. The results were inconsistent both when using tools alone and in combination with other tools. Outcome measure heterogeneity precluded meaningful meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence regarding use of MSI risk factor screening tools for preventing injury. Rigorous studies that utilize previously validated tools are needed.

摘要

简介

肌肉骨骼损伤(MSI)对全球健康负担有影响。需要有效的 MSI 预防措施。雇主可以使用 MSI 风险因素筛查工具来识别和减轻职业危害。这些工具的有效性尚未进行严格的综合评估。我们综合了有关 MSI 风险因素筛查工具在通过预防干预减少损伤方面的有效性的文献。

材料与方法

对 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆(试验)、CINAHL、Scopus 和 PsycINFO 数据库进行了文献检索。纳入的研究需要分析设计,使用 MSI 风险因素筛查工具为工作年龄段人群提供干预,并报告 MSI 发展、损伤或赔偿/工作缺勤的结果。完成了数据提取和研究质量评分(Downs 和 Black 标准)。研究分为使用单一 MSI 筛查工具(单一工具)来告知预防干预或涉及多个同时使用的筛查工具(多工具)。在可能的情况下,对研究结果进行了综合。

结果

有 18 篇文章代表 14 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。没有发现高质量的研究(最高 Downs 和 Black 评分为 19 分)。研究没有使用以前验证过的工具,而是通常针对单一用途而专门设计的工具。单独使用工具和与其他工具结合使用时,结果都不一致。结果衡量标准的异质性使得进行有意义的荟萃分析变得不可能。

结论

关于使用 MSI 风险因素筛查工具预防损伤的证据有限。需要使用以前验证过的工具进行严格的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9c/9916206/86f6a5bb5f72/ijerph-20-02762-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9c/9916206/392e9395140c/ijerph-20-02762-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9c/9916206/86f6a5bb5f72/ijerph-20-02762-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9c/9916206/392e9395140c/ijerph-20-02762-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9c/9916206/86f6a5bb5f72/ijerph-20-02762-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effectiveness of Workplace Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Factor Screening Tools for Reducing Injury: A Systematic Review.工作场所肌肉骨骼损伤风险因素筛查工具在降低损伤方面的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;20(3):2762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032762.
2
Pre-employment examinations for preventing injury, disease and sick leave in workers.为预防工人受伤、患病和病假而进行的入职前检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 12;2016(1):CD008881. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008881.pub2.
3
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
4
Antiretroviral post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for occupational HIV exposure.职业性HIV暴露后的抗逆转录病毒暴露后预防(PEP)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD002835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002835.pub3.
5
Ergonomic design and training for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck in adults.预防成人上肢和颈部与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的人体工程学设计与培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD008570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008570.pub2.
6
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
7
Workplace interventions for preventing work disability.预防工作残疾的工作场所干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD006955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub2.
8
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
9
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
10
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.行为干预戒烟:综述和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Musculoskeletal disorder risk assessment tool use: A Canadian perspective.肌肉骨骼疾病风险评估工具的使用:加拿大视角。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jul;102:103740. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103740. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
2
Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review.基于文献回顾的 OWAS、RULA 和 REBA 的系统比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010595.
3
The need for adaptable global guidance in health systems strengthening for musculoskeletal health: a qualitative study of international key informants.
需要制定适应全球变化的卫生系统强化骨骼肌肉健康全球指导意见:对国际关键信息提供者的定性研究。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 May 28;6(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00201-7.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods.效果方向图再探:2019 年 Cochrane 手册关于替代综合方法的指导应用。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):29-33. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1458. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.系统评价中不进行荟萃分析的综合 (SWiM):报告指南。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6890.
7
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
8
Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions.减轻全球肌肉骨骼疾病负担。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 May 1;96(5):366-368. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.204891. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions.预防和治疗下腰痛:证据、挑战和有前途的方向。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
10
Scientific basis of ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.ISO 生物力学风险因素标准的科学基础。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 May 1;44(3):323-329. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3718. Epub 2018 Feb 27.