Regenerative and Precision Medicine Department and Jonic Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience Department (DiBraiN), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 3;24(3):3057. doi: 10.3390/ijms24033057.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is one of the most common neurodevelopment disorders, characterized by a multifactorial etiology based on the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. Recent evidence supports the neurobiological hypothesis based on neuroinflammation theory. To date, there are no sufficiently validated diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ASD. Therefore, we decided to investigate the potential diagnostic role for ASD of two biomarkers well known for other neurological inflammatory conditions: the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the neurofilament (Nfl). Nfl and GFAP serum levels were analyzed using SiMoA technology in a group of ASD patients and in a healthy control group (CTRS), age- and gender-matched. Then we investigated the distribution, frequency, and correlation between serum Nfl and GFAP levels and clinical data among the ASD group. The comparison of Nfl and GFAP serum levels between ASD children and the control group showed a mean value of these two markers significantly higher in the ASD group (sNfL mean value ASD pt 6.86 pg/mL median value ASD pt 5.7 pg/mL; mean value CTRS 3.55 pg/mL; median value CTRS 3.1 pg; GFAP mean value ASD pt 205.7 pg/mL median value ASD pt 155.4 pg/mL; mean value CTRS 77.12 pg/mL; median value CTRS 63.94 pg/mL). Interestingly, we also found a statistically significant positive correlation between GFAP levels and hyperactivity symptoms (-value <0.001). Further investigations using larger groups are necessary to confirm our data and to verify in more depth the potential correlation between these biomarkers and ASD clinical features, such as the severity of the core symptoms, the presence of associated symptoms, and/or the evaluation of a therapeutic intervention. However, these data not only might shed a light on the neurobiology of ASD, supporting the neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration hypothesis, but they also might support the use of these biomarkers in the early diagnosis of ASD, to longitudinally monitor the disease activity, and even more as future prognostic biomarkers.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是最常见的神经发育障碍之一,其病因基于遗传和环境因素的相互作用,具有多因素病因。最近的证据支持基于神经炎症理论的神经生物学假说。迄今为止,ASD 没有足够验证的诊断和预后生物标志物。因此,我们决定研究两种标志物在 ASD 中的潜在诊断作用,这两种标志物在其他神经炎症疾病中是众所周知的:胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和神经丝(Nfl)。使用 SiMoA 技术分析了一组 ASD 患者和一组年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组(CTRS)的血清 GFAP 和 Nfl 水平。然后,我们研究了 ASD 组中血清 Nfl 和 GFAP 水平的分布、频率及其与临床数据之间的相关性。ASD 患儿与对照组之间血清 Nfl 和 GFAP 水平的比较显示,这两种标志物在 ASD 组中的平均值明显更高(sNfL ASD 组平均值 6.86pg/ml,中位数 ASD 组 5.7pg/ml;CTRS 组平均值 3.55pg/ml,中位数 CTRS 组 3.1pg/ml;GFAP ASD 组平均值 205.7pg/ml,中位数 ASD 组 155.4pg/ml;CTRS 组平均值 77.12pg/ml,中位数 CTRS 组 63.94pg/ml)。有趣的是,我们还发现 GFAP 水平与多动症状之间存在统计学上显著的正相关(-值<0.001)。使用更大的样本组进行进一步的研究是必要的,以证实我们的数据,并更深入地验证这些生物标志物与 ASD 临床特征之间的潜在相关性,如核心症状的严重程度、相关症状的存在,以及/或治疗干预的评估。然而,这些数据不仅可以阐明 ASD 的神经生物学,支持神经炎症和神经退行性假说,还可以支持这些生物标志物在 ASD 的早期诊断中的应用,以纵向监测疾病活动,甚至更作为未来的预后生物标志物。