Di Martino Alberto, Brunello Matteo, Rossomando Valentino, Pederiva Davide, Schilardi Francesco, Stefanini Niccolò, Geraci Giuseppe, Faldini Cesare
Ist Orthopaedic Department, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science-DIBINEM, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 30;12(3):1072. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031072.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be performed by several approaches such as direct anterior (DAA), direct lateral (DL) and postero-lateral (PL). Our study was conducted to compare among different approaches, such as DAA, bikini (BK) and PL, the aesthetic impact of the scar, differences in the position of prosthetic components and differences in functional rehabilitation outcomes. Materials and methods: Population, composed by 240 patients, was collected among patients treated for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 and divided by surgical approach. Of these, 160 female patients were included in the current analysis, leaving 58 DAA, 52 BK patients and 50 PL patients. Demographic and clinical parameters were retrospectively collected: age, BMI, time of surgery, length of stay, Harris Hip Score (HHS) before and after surgery at 6 months and patient, intra/post-surgical complications and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Results and Discussion: Our results showed a better aesthetical result in BK group compared to DAA group and faster rehabilitation with the DAA compared to PL. Optimal cup positioning was reached both in PL approach and DAA approach. DAA showed no increase in complications compared to PL approach and offered a faster recovery. Bikini approach is an alternative to the standard DAA approach and can be proposed for patients where a better aesthetic result is desired in addition to better functional recover.
全髋关节置换术(THA)可通过多种入路进行,如直接前路(DAA)、直接外侧(DL)和后外侧(PL)。我们开展这项研究的目的是比较不同入路(如DAA、比基尼切口(BK)和PL)之间瘢痕的美学影响、假体组件位置的差异以及功能康复结果的差异。材料与方法:收集了2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间接受初次全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗的240例患者,并根据手术入路进行分组。其中,160例女性患者纳入本次分析,包括58例采用DAA入路、52例采用BK入路和50例采用PL入路的患者。回顾性收集人口统计学和临床参数:年龄、体重指数、手术时间、住院时间、术前及术后6个月的Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、患者情况、手术中/后并发症以及患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)。结果与讨论:我们的结果显示,与DAA组相比,BK组的美学效果更好;与PL组相比,DAA组的康复速度更快。PL入路和DAA入路均达到了髋臼的最佳位置。与PL入路相比,DAA入路的并发症没有增加,且恢复更快。比基尼入路是标准DAA入路的一种替代方法,对于那些除了希望获得更好的功能恢复外,还希望获得更好美学效果的患者可以采用。