Sun Chuanrui, Xi Fengchan, Li Jiang, Yu Wenkui, Wang Xiling
Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200231, China.
Research Institute of General Surgery, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 30;12(3):1091. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031091.
This study aimed to identify the long-term D-dimer trajectory patterns and their associations with in-hospital all-cause mortality in abdominal trauma patients. This is a retrospective cohort study of general adult abdominal trauma patients admitted to Jinling Hospital (Nanjing, China) between January 2010 and April 2020. Group-based trajectory modeling was applied to model D-dimer trajectories over the first 50 days post-trauma. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the associations between D-dimer trajectories and in-hospital all-cause mortality. A total of 309 patients were included. We identified four distinct D-dimer trajectories: group 1 (57.61%; "stable low"), group 2 (28.16%; "moderate-decline"), group 3 (8.41%; "high-rapid decline"), and group 4 (5.83%; "high-gradual decline"). The SOFA score ( = 0.005) and ISS ( = 0.001) were statistically higher in groups 3 and 4 than in groups 1 and 2. The LMWH and UFH did not differ between groups 3 and 4. Compared with the patients in group 1, only the patients in group 4 were at a higher risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality (OR = 6.94, 95% CI: 1.20-40.25). The long-term D-dimer trajectories post-trauma were heterogeneous and associated with mortality. An initially high and slowly-resolved D-dimer might function as the marker of disease deterioration, and specific interventions are needed.
本研究旨在确定腹部创伤患者的长期D-二聚体轨迹模式及其与院内全因死亡率的关联。这是一项对2010年1月至2020年4月期间入住金陵医院(中国南京)的成年普通腹部创伤患者的回顾性队列研究。应用基于组的轨迹模型来模拟创伤后前50天的D-二聚体轨迹。进行多变量逻辑回归以估计D-二聚体轨迹与院内全因死亡率之间的关联。共纳入309例患者。我们确定了四种不同的D-二聚体轨迹:第1组(57.61%;“稳定低水平”)、第2组(28.16%;“中度下降”)、第3组(8.41%;“快速高下降”)和第4组(5.83%;“缓慢高下降”)。第3组和第4组的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(P = 0.005)和损伤严重度评分(ISS)(P = 0.001)在统计学上高于第1组和第2组。第3组和第4组之间低分子肝素(LMWH)和普通肝素(UFH)的使用情况无差异。与第1组患者相比,只有第4组患者院内全因死亡风险更高(比值比[OR]=6.94,95%置信区间[CI]:1.20 - 40.25)。创伤后的长期D-二聚体轨迹具有异质性且与死亡率相关。初始时较高且缓慢消退的D-二聚体可能作为疾病恶化的标志物,需要采取特定的干预措施。