Biomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4500, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;23(3):1598. doi: 10.3390/s23031598.
This study aims to predict emotions using biosignals collected via wrist-worn sensor and evaluate the performance of different prediction models. Two dimensions of emotions were considered: valence and arousal. The data collected by the sensor were used in conjunction with target values obtained from questionnaires. A variety of classification and regression models were compared, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models. Additionally, the effects of different normalization methods and the impact of using different sensors were studied, and the way in which the results differed between the study subjects was analyzed. The results revealed that regression models generally performed better than classification models, with LSTM regression models achieving the best results. The normalization method called baseline reduction was found to be the most effective, and when used with an LSTM-based regression model it achieved high accuracy in detecting valence (mean square error = 0.43 and R2-score = 0.71) and arousal (mean square error = 0.59 and R2-score = 0.81). Moreover, it was found that even if all biosignals were not used in the training phase, reliable models could be obtained; in fact, for certain study subjects the best results were obtained using only a few of the sensors.
本研究旨在通过腕戴式传感器采集的生物信号预测情绪,并评估不同预测模型的性能。考虑了情绪的两个维度:效价和唤醒度。传感器采集的数据与从问卷中获得的目标值结合使用。比较了多种分类和回归模型,包括长短期记忆 (LSTM) 模型。此外,研究了不同归一化方法的影响以及使用不同传感器的影响,并分析了研究对象之间结果的差异方式。结果表明,回归模型的性能通常优于分类模型,其中 LSTM 回归模型的效果最佳。所采用的名为基线缩减的归一化方法最为有效,当与基于 LSTM 的回归模型一起使用时,它在检测效价(均方误差 = 0.43,R2 得分 = 0.71)和唤醒度(均方误差 = 0.59,R2 得分 = 0.81)方面取得了很高的准确率。此外,即使在训练阶段未使用所有生物信号,也可以获得可靠的模型;实际上,对于某些研究对象,仅使用少数传感器就可以获得最佳结果。