Musso Sofia, Buscemi Felice, Bonossi Lapo, Silven Manikon Poulley, Torregrossa Fabio, Iacopino Domenico Gerardo, Grasso Giovanni
Department of Biomedicine, Neurosurgical Unit, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):401-409. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_112_22. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
Lumbar spinal degenerative disease (LSDD), unresponsive to conservative therapy, is commonly treated by surgical decompression and interbody fusion. Since facet joint incompetence has been suggested as responsible for the entire phenomenon of spinal degeneration, facet stabilization can be considered as an alternative technique to treat symptomatic spinal degenerative disease. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for studies utilizing lumbar facet joint fixation techniques for LSDD to assess their safety and efficacy.
A systematic literature review was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement, with no limits in terms of date of publication. Demographic data, inclusion criteria, clinical and radiological outcome, frequency of adverse events (AEs), and follow-up time were evaluated.
A total of 19 studies were included with a total of 1577 patients. The techniques used for facet arthrodesis were Goel intra-articular spacers in 21 patients (5.3%), Facet Wedge in 198 patients (15.8%), facet screws fixation techniques in 1062 patients (52.6%), and facet joints arthroplasty in 296 patients (26.3%). Clinical outcomes were assessed through the evaluation of pain relief and improvement in functional outcome. Radiological outcomes were assessed by the evaluation of proper positioning of instrumentation, solid bony fusion rate, and preservation of disk height. AE's mainly observed were pseudoarthrosis, reoperation, instrumentation displacement/malpositioning/migration, neurological impairment, deep vein thrombosis, and infections. The mean follow-up time ranged from 6 months to 11.7 years.
Our data demonstrate that facet joint arthrodesis appears to be effective in managing LSDD. These findings, however, are limited by the small sample size of patients. Accordingly, larger series are needed before formal recommendations can be made.
腰椎退行性疾病(LSDD)若对保守治疗无反应,通常采用手术减压和椎间融合术进行治疗。由于小关节功能不全被认为是脊柱退变整个现象的原因,小关节稳定术可被视为治疗有症状脊柱退行性疾病的替代技术。本研究的目的是系统回顾利用腰椎小关节固定技术治疗LSDD的研究文献,以评估其安全性和有效性。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明进行系统文献回顾,对发表日期无限制。评估人口统计学数据、纳入标准、临床和放射学结果、不良事件(AE)发生率以及随访时间。
共纳入19项研究,总计1577例患者。用于小关节融合的技术包括:21例患者(5.3%)采用Goel关节内间隔器,198例患者(15.8%)采用小关节楔形物,1062例患者(52.6%)采用小关节螺钉固定技术,296例患者(26.3%)采用小关节置换术。通过评估疼痛缓解情况和功能结局改善来评估临床结果。通过评估器械的正确定位、坚固的骨融合率和椎间盘高度的保留情况来评估放射学结果。主要观察到的AE包括假关节形成、再次手术、器械移位/位置不当/迁移、神经损伤、深静脉血栓形成和感染。平均随访时间为6个月至11.7年。
我们的数据表明,小关节融合术在治疗LSDD方面似乎是有效的。然而,这些发现受到患者样本量小的限制。因此,在做出正式推荐之前,需要更大规模的系列研究。