Byvaltsev Vadim A, Kalinin Andrei A, Pestryakov Yurii Ya, Aliyev Marat A, Yuldashev Ravshan M, Dyussembekov Yermek K, Riew K Daniel
Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Department of Neurosurgery, Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia.
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 27:21925682251331462. doi: 10.1177/21925682251331462.
Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) treated with one-level Direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) in combination with minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) and percutaneous facet joint fixation (PFJF).MethodsThis retrospective single-center study included 98 patients (67 men, 31 women) aged 28 to 59 years with one level lumbar DDD with foraminal and central stenosis, were divided into groups after DLIF: PPSF (n = 50) and PFJF (n = 48). Intraoperative parameters, perioperative clinical data and radiological assessment with X-ray, MRI and CT were used before operation and mean 45-month follow-up. Workload intensity criteria were used to analyze return to work rate.ResultsThe DLIF-PFJF group had significantly shorter surgery time ( = .04), duration of anesthesia ( = .02), X-ray time ( = .02), less back pain ( = .03), better functional status according to ODI ( = .04) and SF-36 PCS ( = .04), less atrophic changes in the multifidus muscle compared with DLIF-PPSF. There were no statistically significant differences in the volume of blood loss, duration of inpatient treatment, VAS leg pain, SF-36 MCS, Macnab results, mean disc height, intervertebral foramen height, sagittal disc angle, global lumbar lordosis, fusion rate, and the number of complications. In heavy/very heavy workload patients, the DLIF-PFJF had a statistically significantly higher rate of return to work compared to the DLIF-PPSF group.ConclusionsDLIF-PFJF appears to be superior to DLIF-PPSF, minimizing invasiveness, which significantly reduces the damage to the paraspinal muscles and also has significant long-term clinical advantages and return to work rates. Both minimally invasive techniques have comparable radiographic parameters, including the height of the intervertebral foramen and disc, fusion rates, global and segmental sagittal correction after surgery.
研究设计
回顾性研究。
目的
探讨采用单节段直接外侧椎间融合术(DLIF)联合微创经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术(PPSF)及经皮小关节固定术(PFJF)治疗腰椎退变性椎间盘疾病(DDD)患者的临床及影像学结果。
方法
这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了98例年龄在28至59岁之间、患有单节段腰椎DDD伴椎间孔及中央管狭窄的患者(67例男性,31例女性),在进行DLIF术后分为两组:PPSF组(n = 50)和PFJF组(n = 48)。术前及平均45个月随访时采用术中参数、围手术期临床数据以及X线、MRI和CT进行影像学评估。使用工作量强度标准分析重返工作率。
结果
与DLIF - PPSF组相比,DLIF - PFJF组手术时间(P = 0.04)、麻醉持续时间(P = 0.02)、X线检查时间(P = 0.02)显著更短,背痛更轻(P = 0.03),根据ODI(P = 0.04)和SF - 36身体功能评分(PCS,P = 0.04)功能状态更好,多裂肌萎缩变化更少。两组在失血量、住院治疗时间、VAS腿痛评分、SF - 36精神健康评分(MCS)、Macnab结果、平均椎间盘高度、椎间孔高度、矢状位椎间盘角度、整体腰椎前凸、融合率及并发症数量方面无统计学显著差异。在重度/极重度工作量患者中,DLIF - PFJF组的重返工作率与DLIF - PPSF组相比具有统计学显著更高。
结论
DLIF - PFJF似乎优于DLIF - PPSF,将侵袭性降至最低,显著减少了对椎旁肌的损伤,并且具有显著的长期临床优势和重返工作率。两种微创技术具有可比的影像学参数,包括椎间孔和椎间盘高度、融合率、术后整体和节段性矢状位矫正。