• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用组合式发光二极管与强脉冲光技术改善成年患者面部血管过度增生的可行性和安全性。

Feasibility and Safety of Using Combined Light-Emitting Diodes Versus Intense Pulsed Light Technology for the Improvement of Facial Hypervascularization in Adult Patients.

机构信息

Elite Laser Clinic, Laser Department, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 Feb;41(2):64-72. doi: 10.1089/photob.2022.0079.

DOI:10.1089/photob.2022.0079
PMID:36780573
Abstract

Superficial facial vascular lesions can be an aesthetic problem and a symptom of different skin diseases. It was to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of Dermalux Tri-Wave MD, based on three combined light-emitting diodes (LEDs) technology and intense pulsed light (IPL) for reducing the excess of facial vascularization due to superficial cutaneous vascular lesions. The study had a single-center, proof-of-concept, open-label, and prospective design. Two groups of adult patients were treated for facial hypervascularization, LED-Group with an LED device combining 633 and 830 nm and IPL-Group with an IPL (555-950 and 530-750 nm). Variables assessed were hemoglobin hyperconcentration (HH), hemoglobin-affected area (HAA) through Antera 3D, and pain using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Twenty subjects were included, 10 by group (50% female). LED-Group: Mean age 32.1 years (range, 2146). IPL-Group: Mean age 34.5 years (range, 2549). HH: LED-Group 100% had a moderate improvement; in the IPL-Group, 10% was moderate, and 90% was marked. HAA: LED-Group 10% had a slight improvement, 70% moderate, and 20% marked; in the IPL-Group, 100%, the improvement was marked. Seventy percent of LED-Group patients reported no pain, 30% mild; in the IPL-Group, 100% of patients reported severe pain. Treatment with combined red and near-infrared LEDs effectively reduced the excess of facial vascularization with moderate outcomes compared with IPL, but without secondary effects and no pain. This treatment could represent an effective, safe, and well-tolerated approach for facial vascular lesions.

摘要

面部表浅血管病变可能是一个美学问题,也是不同皮肤疾病的一种症状。本研究旨在比较基于三种复合发光二极管(LED)技术和强脉冲光(IPL)的 Dermalux Tri-Wave MD 治疗因面部表浅血管病变导致的面部血管过度增生的疗效和安全性。本研究为单中心、概念验证、开放标签和前瞻性设计。两组成年患者接受了面部血管过度增生的治疗,LED 组采用结合 633nm 和 830nm 的 LED 设备,而 IPL 组采用 IPL(555-950nm 和 530-750nm)。评估的变量包括血红蛋白高度浓缩(HH)、通过 Antera 3D 评估的血红蛋白影响区域(HAA)和使用数字疼痛评分量表评估的疼痛。共纳入 20 名受试者,每组 10 名(50%为女性)。LED 组:平均年龄 32.1 岁(范围 21-46 岁);IPL 组:平均年龄 34.5 岁(范围 25-49 岁)。HH:LED 组 100%有中度改善;在 IPL 组中,10%为中度,90%为显著。HAA:LED 组 10%有轻度改善,70%为中度,20%为显著;在 IPL 组中,100%的改善为显著。70%的 LED 组患者报告无疼痛,30%为轻度;在 IPL 组中,100%的患者报告严重疼痛。与 IPL 相比,联合使用红色和近红外 LED 治疗可有效减少面部血管过度增生,疗效为中度,且无副作用和疼痛。这种治疗方法可能是一种有效、安全且耐受良好的面部血管病变治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Feasibility and Safety of Using Combined Light-Emitting Diodes Versus Intense Pulsed Light Technology for the Improvement of Facial Hypervascularization in Adult Patients.使用组合式发光二极管与强脉冲光技术改善成年患者面部血管过度增生的可行性和安全性。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 Feb;41(2):64-72. doi: 10.1089/photob.2022.0079.
2
A retrospective analysis for facial telangiectasia treatment using pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light configured with different wavelength bands.回顾性分析使用不同波长带宽配置的脉冲染料激光和强脉冲光治疗面部毛细血管扩张症。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jan;19(1):88-92. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13179. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
New Insight in Noninvasive Rejuvenation: The Role of a Rhodamine-Intense Pulsed Light System.非侵入性嫩肤新见解:罗丹明强脉冲光系统的作用
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 Sep;37(9):539-543. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4626. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
4
A split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the long-pulsed alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system.长脉冲翠绿宝石激光与强脉冲光系统用于面部脱毛的半脸对照研究。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015;17(5):267-72. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2015.1027223.
5
Short pulse intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser for the treatment of facial redness.短脉冲强脉冲光与脉冲染料激光治疗面部红斑。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2020 Feb 17;22(2):60-64. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2020.1717540. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Rhodamine intense pulsed light versus conventional intense pulsed light for facial telangiectasias.若丹明强脉冲光与传统强脉冲光治疗面部毛细血管扩张症的对比
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016;18(2):80-5. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2015.1114641. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
7
Efficacy and safety comparison between pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light configured with different wavelength bands in treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.不同波长带配置的脉冲染料激光与强脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻的疗效和安全性比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1;39(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04098-9.
8
IPL vs PDL in treatment of facial erythema: A split-face study.强脉冲光与脉冲染料激光治疗面部红斑的对比研究:一项半脸对照研究
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Dec;16(4):450-453. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12365. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
9
Sequential delivery of intense pulsed light and long-pulse 1.064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser shows better effect in the treatment of facial telangiectasias than using them separately.强脉冲光与长脉冲1.064纳米掺钕钇铝石榴石激光序贯治疗面部毛细血管扩张症的效果优于单独使用这两种方法。
G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;152(1):1-7. doi: 10.23736/S0392-0488.16.05143-9. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
10
A comparative study of intense pulsed light alone and its combination with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of facial acne in Asian skin.强脉冲光单独治疗与联合光动力疗法治疗亚洲人面部痤疮的对比研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Jan;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20469.