• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展通过小扰动法测量游泳者主动阻力的技术。

Development of the technology to measure active drag ofswimmers by the method of small perturbations.

机构信息

Department of Sports Disciplines, Northern (Arctic) Federal University Named After M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Severnaya Dvina embankment, 17, Arkhangelsk, Russia.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2023 Mar;149:111486. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111486. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111486
PMID:36780732
Abstract

The research aimed at further improvement of the technology of measuring swimmers' active drag by the small perturbation method (SPM) at the average maximal swimming velocity (v). For better reliability and accuracy of measurements, a standard variant of SPM was developed to measure automatically active drag (F), dimensionless coefficient of hydrodynamic force (C) and total external mechanical power P in different competitive swimming techniques during a single 50 m trial. The study involved twelve elite swimmers who specialized in front crawl at the distances of 100 and 200 m (780-850 FINA Points). From our measurements, in front crawl the results are following: v = 1.909 ± 0.017 m·s, F = 106.892 ± 7.276 N, C = 0.311 ± 0.028 and P = 204.033 ± 13.221 W. For objective estimation of the results, a verification variant of SPM was applied: v = 1.911 ± 0.018 m·s, F = 107.033 ± 7.232 N, C = 0.311 ± 0.030 and P = 204.467 ± 12.982 W. The correlation analysis of the results obtained by the standard and verification variants of SPM confirms high accuracy and reliability of the method used (r = 0.988 for v; r = 0.979 for F; r = 0.988 for C; r = 0.979 for P). The measurement error, including the method error and the devices error, does not exceed 2.4 %. This method has also a systematic error that reduces the measured data in the same direction from the actual values (min = -2.1 %; max = -2.9 %). This error should be taken into account when analyzing and evaluating the measured hydrodynamic characteristics of swimmers.

摘要

本研究旨在通过小扰动量法(SPM)进一步改进测量游泳者在平均最大游泳速度(v)下主动阻力的技术。为了提高测量的可靠性和准确性,开发了一种标准的 SPM 变体,以在单次 50 米试验中测量不同竞技游泳技术的主动阻力(F)、流体动力力的无因次系数(C)和总外部机械功率 P。该研究涉及 12 名专门从事 100 米和 200 米(780-850 FINA 点)自由泳的精英游泳运动员。从我们的测量结果来看,在自由泳中,结果如下:v=1.909±0.017 m·s,F=106.892±7.276 N,C=0.311±0.028,P=204.033±13.221 W。为了客观评估结果,应用了 SPM 的验证变体:v=1.911±0.018 m·s,F=107.033±7.232 N,C=0.311±0.030,P=204.467±12.982 W。标准 SPM 变体和验证变体的结果相关性分析证实了所使用方法的高度准确性和可靠性(v 为 r=0.988;F 为 r=0.979;C 为 r=0.988;P 为 r=0.979)。测量误差包括方法误差和设备误差,不超过 2.4%。该方法还有系统误差,会导致测量数据向实际值的同一方向减小(最小值为-2.1%;最大值为-2.9%)。在分析和评估游泳者的测量流体动力特性时,应考虑到这一误差。

相似文献

1
Development of the technology to measure active drag ofswimmers by the method of small perturbations.发展通过小扰动法测量游泳者主动阻力的技术。
J Biomech. 2023 Mar;149:111486. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111486. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
How do swimmers control their front crawl swimming velocity? Current knowledge and gaps from hydrodynamic perspectives.游泳者如何控制他们的自由泳速度?从流体动力学角度看当前的认知与差距。
Sports Biomech. 2023 Dec;22(12):1552-1571. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1959946. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
Monitoring Master Swimmers' Performance and Active Drag Evolution along a Training Mesocycle.监测大师级游泳运动员在一个训练中周期的表现和主动阻力演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073569.
4
Agreement between Different Methods to Measure the Active Drag Coefficient in Front-Crawl Swimming.不同方法测量自由泳主动阻力系数之间的一致性
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jan 20;86:41-49. doi: 10.5114/jhk/159605. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity.最大速度下不同游泳姿势的主动阻力、有用机械功率输出和水动力系数。
J Biomech. 1992 Mar;25(3):311-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90028-y.
6
Contribution of uncertainty in estimation of active drag using assisted towing method in front crawl swimming.在自由泳中使用辅助拖曳法估计主动阻力时不确定性的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2018 Jan;36(1):7-13. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1276295. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Characterization of speed fluctuation and drag force in young swimmers: a gender comparison.年轻游泳运动员速度波动和阻力的特征:性别比较
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Dec;32(6):1214-25. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.009. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
8
AquaTrainer® Snorkel does not Increase Hydrodynamic Drag but Influences Turning Time.水肺训练器®呼吸管不会增加水动力阻力,但会影响转向时间。
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;37(4):324-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555859. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Developing a methodology for estimating the drag in front-crawl swimming at various velocities.开发一种用于估算不同速度下自由泳阻力的方法。
J Biomech. 2017 Mar 21;54:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Young swimmers' classification based on kinematics, hydrodynamics, and anthropometrics.基于运动学、流体动力学和人体测量学的年轻游泳运动员分类
J Appl Biomech. 2014 Apr;30(2):310-5. doi: 10.1123/jab.2013-0038. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Associations Between the Swimming Speed, Anthropometrics, Kinematics, and Kinetics in the Butterfly Stroke.蝶泳中游泳速度、人体测量学、运动学和动力学之间的关联
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;12(8):797. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080797.