Wang Frances M, Yebyo Henock G, Ballew Shoshana H, Cainzos-Achirica Miguel, Boyd Cynthia, Puhan Milo A, Matsushita Kunihiro, Blaha Michael J, Schoenborn Nancy L
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jan 30;13:100468. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100468. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Personalizing preventive therapies for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is particularly important for older adults, as they tend to have multiple chronic conditions, increased risk for medication adverse effects, and may have heterogenous preferences when weighing health outcomes. However, little is known about outcome preferences related to ASCVD preventive therapies in older adults.
In May 2021, using an established online panel, KnowledgePanel, we surveyed older US adults aged 65-84 years without history of ASCVD on outcome preferences related to statin therapy (benefit outcomes to be reduced by the therapy: heart attack, stroke; adverse effects: diabetes, abnormal liver test, muscle pain) or aspirin therapy (benefit outcomes: heart attack, stroke; adverse effects: brain bleed, bowel bleed, stomach ulcer). We used standardized best-worst scores (range of -1 for "least worrisome" to +1 for "most worrisome") and conditional logistic regression to examine the relative importance of the outcomes.
In this study, 607 ASCVD-free participants (median age 74, 46% male, 81% White) were included; 304 and 303 completed the statin and aspirin versions of the survey, respectively. For statin-related outcomes, stroke and heart attack were most worrisome (score 0.55; 95% CI 0.51, 0.60) and (0.53; 0.48, 0.58), followed by potential harms of diabetes (-0.07; -0.10, -0.03), abnormal liver test (-0.25; -0.29, -0.20), and muscle pain (-0.77; -0.82, -0.73). For aspirin-related outcomes, stroke and heart attack were similarly most worrisome (0.48; 0.43, 0.52) and (0.43; 0.38, 0.48), followed by brain bleed (0.30; 0.25, 0.34), bowel bleed (-0.31; -0.33, -0.28), and stomach ulcer (-0.90; -0.92, -0.87). Conditional logistic regression and subgroup analyses by age, sex, and race yielded similar results.
Older adults generally consider outcomes related to benefits of ASCVD primary preventive therapies-stroke and heart attack-more important than their adverse effects. Integrating patient preferences with risk assessment is an important next step for personalizing ASCVD preventive therapies for older adults.
为动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)制定个性化预防疗法对老年人尤为重要,因为他们往往患有多种慢性病,药物不良反应风险增加,并且在权衡健康结果时可能有不同的偏好。然而,对于老年人与ASCVD预防疗法相关的结果偏好知之甚少。
2021年5月,我们使用一个成熟的在线小组KnowledgePanel,对65 - 84岁无ASCVD病史的美国老年人进行了关于他汀类药物治疗(治疗可降低的获益结果:心脏病发作、中风;不良反应:糖尿病、肝功能异常、肌肉疼痛)或阿司匹林治疗(获益结果:心脏病发作、中风;不良反应:脑出血、肠出血、胃溃疡)相关结果偏好的调查。我们使用标准化的最佳 - 最差评分(“最不令人担忧”为 - 1至“最令人担忧”为 + 1)和条件逻辑回归来检验这些结果的相对重要性。
本研究纳入了607名无ASCVD的参与者(中位年龄74岁,46%为男性,81%为白人);分别有304名和303名参与者完成了他汀类药物和阿司匹林版本的调查。对于与他汀类药物相关的结果,中风和心脏病发作最令人担忧(评分0.55;95%置信区间0.51,0.60)和(0.53;0.48,0.58),其次是糖尿病的潜在危害( - 0.07; - 0.10, - 0.03)、肝功能异常( - 0.25; - 0.29, - 0.20)和肌肉疼痛( - 0.77; - 0.82, - 0.73)。对于与阿司匹林相关的结果,中风和心脏病发作同样最令人担忧(0.48;0.43,0.52)和(0.43;0.38,0.48),其次是脑出血(0.30;0.25,0.34)、肠出血( - 0.31; - 0.33, - 0.28)和胃溃疡( - 0.90; - 0.92, - 0.87)。条件逻辑回归以及按年龄、性别和种族进行的亚组分析得出了相似的结果。
老年人通常认为与ASCVD一级预防疗法的获益相关的结果——中风和心脏病发作——比其不良反应更重要。将患者偏好与风险评估相结合是为老年人制定个性化ASCVD预防疗法的重要下一步。