• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“成功康复”是什么?一项多利益相关者名义小组技术研究,旨在为康复结果测量提供信息。

What is 'successful rehabilitation'? A multi-stakeholder nominal group technique study to inform rehabilitation outcome measurement.

机构信息

Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Centre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2023 Sep;37(9):1248-1259. doi: 10.1177/02692155231157181. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1177/02692155231157181
PMID:36785902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387716/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore how stakeholders in rehabilitation conceptualise 'successful rehabilitation', to inform the development of a minimum dataset and core outcomes for sub-acute rehabilitation.

DESIGN

Qualitative consensus study using the nominal group technique.

SETTING

Online focus groups.

PARTICIPANTS

Consumer representatives ( = 7), clinicians ( = 15), and health service managers ( = 9) from Australia.

INTERVENTION

Participants responded to the question, 'What does successful rehabilitation look like?'. Following item generation, they prioritised their top five responses, allocating 100 points across items to denote relative importance.

MAIN MEASURES

Prioritised responses were analysed across stakeholder groups using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Ten themes were identified. 'Successful rehabilitation' is: (1) person and family centred; (2) effective; (3) inter-professional; (4) accessible; (5) goal oriented with meaningful outcomes; (6) connected to the continuum of care; (7) evidence-based and supportive of innovation and research; (8) appropriately funded and skilled; (9) satisfying and engaging; and (10) safe.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholder-defined 'successful rehabilitation' aligned with principles of value-based care and evidence-based rehabilitation. Provision and receipt of person and family centred care was the most important indicator of successful rehabilitation. Measures of success should include indicators of structure, process, outcome, and experience, and be conducted at multiple time-points.

摘要

目的

探讨康复利益相关者如何概念化“成功的康复”,以为亚急性康复制定最小数据集和核心结局提供信息。

设计

使用名义群体技术的定性共识研究。

设置

在线焦点小组。

参与者

来自澳大利亚的消费者代表(7 人)、临床医生(15 人)和卫生服务经理(9 人)。

干预措施

参与者回答了“成功的康复是什么样子的?”这个问题。在项目生成后,他们对前五个回应进行了优先排序,为每个项目分配 100 分,以表示相对重要性。

主要措施

使用定性内容分析对利益相关者群体的优先事项进行了分析。

结果

确定了十个主题。“成功的康复”是:(1)以患者和家庭为中心;(2)有效;(3)跨专业;(4)可及;(5)以目标为导向,具有有意义的结果;(6)与连续护理相连接;(7)基于证据,支持创新和研究;(8)适当的资金和技能支持;(9)令人满意和参与;(10)安全。

结论

利益相关者定义的“成功康复”与基于价值的护理和基于证据的康复原则一致。以患者和家庭为中心的护理的提供和接受是成功康复的最重要指标。成功的衡量标准应包括结构、过程、结果和体验的指标,并在多个时间点进行。

相似文献

1
What is 'successful rehabilitation'? A multi-stakeholder nominal group technique study to inform rehabilitation outcome measurement.“成功康复”是什么?一项多利益相关者名义小组技术研究,旨在为康复结果测量提供信息。
Clin Rehabil. 2023 Sep;37(9):1248-1259. doi: 10.1177/02692155231157181. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Defining a Patient-Centred Core Outcome Domain Set for the Assessment of Hearing Rehabilitation With Clients and Professionals.为评估与客户及专业人员的听力康复情况定义以患者为中心的核心结局领域集。
Front Neurosci. 2022 May 3;16:787607. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.787607. eCollection 2022.
3
The participatory development of a national core set of person-centred diabetes outcome constructs for use in routine diabetes care across healthcare sectors.为跨医疗保健部门的常规糖尿病护理制定一套以患者为中心的糖尿病结局指标的国家核心集的参与式开发。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00309-7.
4
What really matters in pediatric chronic pain rehabilitation? Results of a multi-stakeholder nominal group technique study.儿科慢性疼痛康复的关键因素是什么?多利益相关方名义小组技术研究的结果。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(12):1675-1686. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1532462. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Person-centred quality indicators for Australian aged care assessment services: a mixed methods study.澳大利亚老年护理评估服务的以人为主的质量指标:一项混合方法研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 14;10(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00606-x.
7
Development of a minimum dataset for subacute rehabilitation: a three-round e-Delphi consensus study.制定亚急性康复最低数据集:三轮电子德尔菲共识研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 25;12(3):e058725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058725.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
'A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want': A Mixed-Methods Approach to Explore and Benchmark Clinically Meaningful Changes in Aphasia Recovery.“有意义的差异,但不是我想要的最终差异”:一种混合方法,旨在探索和基准化失语症康复中的临床有意义的变化。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14169. doi: 10.1111/hex.14169.
10
Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF.对于失语症患者及其家人来说,哪些结果最为重要?一项在国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架内开展的国际名义群体技术研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jul;39(14):1364-1379. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Person-Centred Nutrition and Mealtime Care in Rehabilitation: A Conceptual Model.康复中以患者为中心的营养与用餐护理导航:一个概念模型
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun;38(3):e70079. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70079.
2
Completeness of repeated patient-reported outcome measures in adult rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial in a diverse clinical population.成人康复中重复患者报告结局测量的完整性:一项针对不同临床人群的随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 24;24(1):1648. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12103-8.
3
Impact of Acquired Brain Injury on Quality of Life.获得性脑损伤对生活质量的影响。
Ann Neurosci. 2024 Sep 16:09727531241263670. doi: 10.1177/09727531241263670.
4
Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.重大创伤管理的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum data and core outcomes for subacute rehabilitation: A scoping review.亚急性康复的最低数据和核心结局:范围综述。
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Mar;36(3):388-406. doi: 10.1177/02692155211060468. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
2
Prioritizing guideline recommendations for implementation: a systematic, consumer-inclusive process with a case study using the Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management.确定实施指南建议的优先顺序:一个系统的、包含消费者的过程及使用《澳大利亚卒中管理临床指南》的案例研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 22;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00734-w.
3
Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的全球康复需求估计:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description.康复是什么?一项基于实证的调查研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2020 May;34(5):571-583. doi: 10.1177/0269215520905112. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Person-centered rehabilitation care and outcomes: A systematic literature review.以人为中心的康复护理及效果:系统文献回顾。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 May;93:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
6
Identifying patient-important outcomes in polycystic kidney disease: An international nominal group technique study.确定多囊肾病患者重要的结局:一项国际名义群体技术研究。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2019 Dec;24(12):1214-1224. doi: 10.1111/nep.13566. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
Relational coordination in interprofessional teams and its effect on patient-reported benefit and continuity of care: a prospective cohort study from rehabilitation centres in Western Norway.跨专业团队中的关系协调及其对患者报告的益处和护理连续性的影响:来自挪威西部康复中心的一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3536-5.
8
Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice.团队合作、协作、协调与网络关系:为何我们需要区分不同类型的跨专业实践。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jan;32(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Inequities in access to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: an international scoping review.中风后住院康复机会的不平等:一项国际范围综述
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Dec;24(8):619-626. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1366010. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
Continuity of care in hospital rehabilitation services: a qualitative insight from inpatients' experience.医院康复服务中的连续性护理:住院患者体验的定性洞察。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Mar-Apr;21(2):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 17.