• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重大创伤管理的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项设定伙伴关系。

Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.

机构信息

Bone and Joint Health, Queen Mary University of London Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK

Department of Emergency, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450
PMID:38754886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11107451/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine research priorities for the management of major trauma, representing the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals.

DESIGN/SETTING: An international research priority-setting partnership.

PARTICIPANTS

People who have experienced major trauma, their carers and relatives, and healthcare professionals involved in treating patients after major trauma. The scope included chest, abdominal and pelvic injuries as well as major bleeding, multiple injuries and those that threaten life or limb.

METHODS

A multiphase priority-setting exercise was conducted in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 24 months (November 2021-October 2023). An international survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties which were then combined into several indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been sufficiently answered. A second international survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 19 questions was taken to a stakeholder workshop, where consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities.

RESULTS

A total of 1572 uncertainties, submitted by 417 respondents (including 132 patients and carers), were received during the initial survey. These were refined into 53 unique indicative questions, of which all 53 were judged to be true uncertainties after reviewing the existing evidence. 373 people (including 115 patients and carers) responded to the interim prioritisation survey and 19 questions were taken to a final consensus workshop between patients, carers and healthcare professionals. At the final workshop, a consensus was reached for the ranking of the top 10 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

The top 10 research priorities for major trauma include patient-centred questions regarding pain relief and prehospital management, multidisciplinary working, novel technologies, rehabilitation and holistic support. These shared priorities will now be used to guide funders and teams wishing to research major trauma around the globe.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定重大创伤管理的研究重点,代表患者、他们的家属、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员的共同优先事项。

设计/设置:国际研究重点设定伙伴关系。

参与者

经历过重大创伤的人、他们的照顾者和亲属以及参与治疗重大创伤后患者的医疗保健专业人员。范围包括胸部、腹部和骨盆损伤以及大出血、多发伤和威胁生命或肢体的伤。

方法

在詹姆斯林德联盟的合作下,进行了一个多阶段的重点设定工作,历时 24 个月(2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 10 月)。一项国际调查要求受访者提交他们的研究不确定性,然后将这些不确定性合并成几个指示性问题。搜索了现有证据,以确保这些问题尚未得到充分回答。第二项国际调查要求受访者对研究问题进行优先排序。最终确定了 19 个问题的简短清单,并将其提交给利益相关者研讨会,在研讨会上达成了前 10 项重点的共识。

结果

在最初的调查中,共收到 417 名受访者(包括 132 名患者和照顾者)提交的 1572 项不确定性。这些不确定性被细化为 53 个独特的指示性问题,在审查现有证据后,所有 53 个问题都被认为是真正的不确定性。373 人(包括 115 名患者和照顾者)对中期优先排序调查做出了回应,有 19 个问题被提交给了患者、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员之间的最终共识研讨会。在最终研讨会上,就前 10 个问题的排名达成了共识。

结论

重大创伤的前 10 项研究重点包括以患者为中心的问题,涉及疼痛缓解和院前管理、多学科工作、新技术、康复和整体支持。这些共同的优先事项将指导全球范围内希望研究重大创伤的资助者和团队。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/11107451/a0fafd4b9154/bmjopen-2023-083450f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/11107451/a0fafd4b9154/bmjopen-2023-083450f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/11107451/a0fafd4b9154/bmjopen-2023-083450f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.重大创伤管理的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450.
2
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.复杂骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e057198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198.
3
Research priorities for the management of broken bones of the upper limb in people over 50: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.50 岁以上人群上肢骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030028.
4
Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership.确定和优先考虑患有听觉过敏症人群的未解决研究问题:詹姆斯林德联盟听觉过敏优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178.
5
Research priorities in fragility fractures of the lower limb and pelvis: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.下肢和骨盆脆性骨折的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 3;8(10):e023301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023301.
6
Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肝糖原贮积病的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项确定合作项目
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12178. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Research Priorities for Pediatric Intensive Care Nutrition Within the United Kingdom: A National Institute of Health Research James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.英国儿科重症监护营养研究重点:一项英国国家卫生研究院詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 4;4(3):e0649. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000649. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Research priorities in foot and ankle conditions: results of a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.足部和踝关节疾病的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟合作的优先事项设定结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 16;13(5):e070641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070641.
9
Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery.确定心脏外科学术研究重点:成人心脏外科学术重点制定合作研究组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038001.
10
Research priorities in advanced heart failure: James Lind alliance priority setting partnership.晚期心力衰竭的研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目
Open Heart. 2020 Jun;7(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001258.

本文引用的文献

1
Early and Empirical High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury: The CRYOSTAT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤后出血的早期和经验性高剂量冷沉淀治疗:CRYOSTAT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 21;330(19):1882-1891. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.21019.
2
Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Trauma Patients With Exsanguinating Hemorrhage: The UK-REBOA Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤性出血性休克患者急诊经皮主动脉腔内球囊阻断复苏:英国 REBOA 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 21;330(19):1862-1871. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20850.
3
Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities.
更新急诊医学研究重点。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Sep;40(9):666-670. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-213019. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
What is 'successful rehabilitation'? A multi-stakeholder nominal group technique study to inform rehabilitation outcome measurement.“成功康复”是什么?一项多利益相关者名义小组技术研究,旨在为康复结果测量提供信息。
Clin Rehabil. 2023 Sep;37(9):1248-1259. doi: 10.1177/02692155231157181. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
5
Disparities in Access to Trauma Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Narrative Review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区创伤护理可及性的差异:一篇叙述性综述
Curr Trauma Rep. 2022;8(3):66-94. doi: 10.1007/s40719-022-00229-1. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
Identifying Research Priorities in Musculoskeletal Trauma Care in Sub-Saharan Africa.确定撒哈拉以南非洲地区肌肉骨骼创伤护理的研究重点。
JB JS Open Access. 2022 Mar 28;7(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00043. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
7
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.复杂骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e057198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198.
8
Use of a modified Delphi process to develop research priorities in major trauma.采用改良 Delphi 流程制定严重创伤研究重点。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):1453-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01722-z. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation.创伤质量指标:创伤管理质量评估的国际认可核心因素。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb 23;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7.
10
Important Issues to Severe Trauma Survivors: A Qualitative Study.严重创伤幸存者的重要问题:一项定性研究。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):189-195. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003879.