• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

森林退化分类对亚马逊地区地上碳储量估计不确定性的影响。

Effects of forest degradation classification on the uncertainty of aboveground carbon estimates in the Amazon.

作者信息

Rangel Pinagé Ekena, Keller Michael, Peck Christopher P, Longo Marcos, Duffy Paul, Csillik Ovidiu

机构信息

College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA.

International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, Río Piedras, 00926, Puerto Rico.

出版信息

Carbon Balance Manag. 2023 Feb 14;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00221-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13021-023-00221-5
PMID:36786979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926651/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tropical forests are critical for the global carbon budget, yet they have been threatened by deforestation and forest degradation by fire, selective logging, and fragmentation. Existing uncertainties on land cover classification and in biomass estimates hinder accurate attribution of carbon emissions to specific forest classes. In this study, we used textural metrics derived from PlanetScope images to implement a probabilistic classification framework to identify intact, logged and burned forests in three Amazonian sites. We also estimated biomass for these forest classes using airborne lidar and compared biomass uncertainties using the lidar-derived estimates only to biomass uncertainties considering the forest degradation classification as well.

RESULTS

Our classification approach reached overall accuracy of 0.86, with accuracy at individual sites varying from 0.69 to 0.93. Logged forests showed variable biomass changes, while burned forests showed an average carbon loss of 35%. We found that including uncertainty in forest degradation classification significantly increased uncertainty and decreased estimates of mean carbon density in two of the three test sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the attribution of biomass changes to forest degradation classes needs to account for the uncertainty in forest degradation classification. By combining very high-resolution images with lidar data, we could attribute carbon stock changes to specific pathways of forest degradation. This approach also allows quantifying uncertainties of carbon emissions associated with forest degradation through logging and fire. Both the attribution and uncertainty quantification provide critical information for national greenhouse gas inventories.

摘要

背景

热带森林对全球碳预算至关重要,但它们受到森林砍伐以及火灾、选择性采伐和森林破碎化导致的森林退化的威胁。土地覆盖分类和生物量估计方面现有的不确定性阻碍了将碳排放准确归因于特定森林类别。在本研究中,我们使用从PlanetScope图像得出的纹理度量来实施一个概率分类框架,以识别三个亚马逊地区的完整森林、采伐森林和火烧森林。我们还使用机载激光雷达估计这些森林类别的生物量,并仅将激光雷达得出的估计值与考虑森林退化分类后的生物量不确定性进行比较,以比较生物量不确定性。

结果

我们的分类方法总体准确率达到0.86,各个地点的准确率在0.69至0.93之间变化。采伐森林显示出不同的生物量变化,而火烧森林平均碳损失为35%。我们发现,在三个测试地点中的两个地点,将森林退化分类中的不确定性考虑在内会显著增加不确定性并降低平均碳密度估计值。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,将生物量变化归因于森林退化类别需要考虑森林退化分类中的不确定性。通过将超高分辨率图像与激光雷达数据相结合,我们可以将碳储量变化归因于森林退化的特定途径。这种方法还允许量化与采伐和火灾导致的森林退化相关的碳排放不确定性。归因和不确定性量化都为国家温室气体清单提供了关键信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/05bed992cdc9/13021_2023_221_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/ffcefb3271de/13021_2023_221_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/dd18c4f6076c/13021_2023_221_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/325da0fed7ae/13021_2023_221_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/4707c8418919/13021_2023_221_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/9fa2e50c3cd1/13021_2023_221_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/62a50af43a99/13021_2023_221_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/05bed992cdc9/13021_2023_221_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/ffcefb3271de/13021_2023_221_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/dd18c4f6076c/13021_2023_221_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/325da0fed7ae/13021_2023_221_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/4707c8418919/13021_2023_221_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/9fa2e50c3cd1/13021_2023_221_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/62a50af43a99/13021_2023_221_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/9926651/05bed992cdc9/13021_2023_221_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of forest degradation classification on the uncertainty of aboveground carbon estimates in the Amazon.森林退化分类对亚马逊地区地上碳储量估计不确定性的影响。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2023 Feb 14;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00221-5.
2
Estimating rainforest biomass stocks and carbon loss from deforestation and degradation in Papua New Guinea 1972-2002: Best estimates, uncertainties and research needs.估计巴布亚新几内亚 1972-2002 年森林砍伐和退化造成的热带雨林生物量储量和碳损失:最佳估计、不确定性和研究需求。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Mar-Apr;91(4):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.006. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
3
Forest degradation and biomass loss along the Chocó region of Colombia.哥伦比亚乔科地区的森林退化和生物量损失。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2019 Mar 23;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13021-019-0117-9.
4
Animal soundscapes reveal key markers of Amazon forest degradation from fire and logging.动物声景揭示了亚马逊森林因火灾和伐木而退化的关键标志。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 3;119(18):e2102878119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102878119. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
A biomass map of the Brazilian Amazon from multisource remote sensing.巴西亚马逊地区多源遥感生物质图
Sci Data. 2023 Sep 30;10(1):668. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02575-4.
6
Dynamics of a human-modified tropical peat swamp forest revealed by repeat lidar surveys.重复激光雷达调查揭示的人为改造热带泥炭沼泽森林动态。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jul;26(7):3947-3964. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15108. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Evaluating spatial coverage of data on the aboveground biomass in undisturbed forests in the Brazilian Amazon.评估巴西亚马逊地区未受干扰森林地上生物量数据的空间覆盖范围。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2019 Sep 3;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13021-019-0126-8.
8
Deforestation in Latin America in the 2000s predominantly occurred outside of typical mature forests.21世纪拉丁美洲的森林砍伐主要发生在典型的成熟森林之外。
Innovation (Camb). 2024 Mar 12;5(3):100610. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100610. eCollection 2024 May 6.
9
A large-scale field assessment of carbon stocks in human-modified tropical forests.大规模实地评估人为改造热带森林的碳储量。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Dec;20(12):3713-26. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12627. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
Fire in the Brazilian Amazon : 3. Dynamics of biomass, C, and nutrient pools in regenerating forests.巴西亚马逊地区的火灾:3. 再生森林中生物量、碳和养分库的动态变化
Oecologia. 2000 Sep;124(4):574-588. doi: 10.1007/s004420000416.

引用本文的文献

1
A large net carbon loss attributed to anthropogenic and natural disturbances in the Amazon Arc of Deforestation.亚马孙毁林弧形区的人为和自然干扰导致大量净碳损失。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2310157121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310157121. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Resource availability and disturbance shape maximum tree height across the Amazon.资源可获取性和干扰会影响亚马逊地区的树木最大高度。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jan;27(1):177-189. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15423. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Impacts of Degradation on Water, Energy, and Carbon Cycling of the Amazon Tropical Forests.退化对亚马逊热带森林水、能量和碳循环的影响。
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2020 Aug;125(8):e2020JG005677. doi: 10.1029/2020JG005677. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Persistent collapse of biomass in Amazonian forest edges following deforestation leads to unaccounted carbon losses.
亚马孙森林边缘的森林砍伐后生物质持续崩溃,导致碳损失无法计算。
Sci Adv. 2020 Sep 30;6(40). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz8360. Print 2020 Sep.
4
Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.长期的森林退化在巴西亚马逊地区超过了森林砍伐。
Science. 2020 Sep 11;369(6509):1378-1382. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3021.
5
Satellite-based estimates reveal widespread forest degradation in the Amazon.卫星估算显示亚马逊地区广泛存在森林退化现象。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):2956-2969. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15029. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
The role of forest conversion, degradation, and disturbance in the carbon dynamics of Amazon indigenous territories and protected areas.森林转换、退化和干扰在亚马逊土著领土和保护区碳动态中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 11;117(6):3015-3025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913321117. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626.退化和不可避免的清除会使完整森林损失的碳影响增加 626 倍。
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 30;5(10):eaax2546. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax2546. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Comment on "Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss".评“基于地上生物量收支的测量结果,热带森林是一个碳汇”一文。
Science. 2019 Jan 11;363(6423). doi: 10.1126/science.aar3629. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
9
Drought-induced Amazonian wildfires instigate a decadal-scale disruption of forest carbon dynamics.干旱引发的亚马孙热带雨林野火促使森林碳动态出现了长达十年的破坏。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 8;373(1760):20180043. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0043.
10
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.全球森林损失的驱动因素分类。
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.