Nicolson Norman G, Tandurella Joseph A, Wu Lawrence W, Patel Jignasha, Morris Eli, Seppälä Toni T, Guinn Samantha, Zlomke Haley, Shubert Christopher R, Lafaro Kelly J, Burns William R, Cameron John L, He Jin, Fertig Elana J, Jaffee Elizabeth M, Zimmerman Jacquelyn W, Burkhart Richard A
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ann Surg. 2024 Sep 4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006517.
We integrate a new approach to chemosensitivity data for clinically-relevant regimen matching, and demonstrate the relationship with clinical outcomes in a large PDO biobank.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) usually recurs following potentially curative resection. Prior studies related patient-derived organoid (PDO) chemosensitivity with clinical responses.
PDOs were established from pre-treatment biopsies in a multi-institution clinical trial (n=21) and clinical specimens at a high-volume pancreatectomy center (n=74, of which 48 were pre-treated). PDO in vitro chemosensitivities to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics (pharmacotypes) were matched to potential clinically-relevant regimens by a weighted nearest-neighbors analysis. Clinical outcomes were then compared for patients who had well-matched versus poorly-matched treatment according to this metric.
Our function matched 91% of PDOs to a standard-of-care regimen (9% pan-resistant). PDOs poorly-matched to the neoadjuvant regimen received would have matched to an alternative in 34% of cases. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy well-matched to their pharmacotype experienced improved CA 19-9 response (60% decreased to normal when well-matched, 29% when poorly-matched, P<0.05) and lymph node down-staging (33% N0 after poorly-matched, 69% after well-matched, P<0.05). Patients receiving both well-matched neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy experienced improved recurrence-free- and overall survival (median RFS 8.5 mo poorly-matched, 15.9 mo well-matched, P<0.05; median OS 19.5 vs. 30.3 mo, P<0.05).
In vitro PDO pharmacotyping can inform PDAC therapy selection. We demonstrate improved outcomes including survival for patients treated with regimens well-matched to their PDO chemosensitivities. A subsequent prospective study using PDO pharmacotype matching could improve oncologic outcomes and improve quality of life by avoiding therapies not expected to be effective.
我们整合了一种新方法来处理化学敏感性数据,以进行临床相关治疗方案匹配,并在一个大型患者来源的类器官生物样本库中证明其与临床结果的关系。
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)在进行了潜在根治性切除术后通常会复发。先前的研究将患者来源的类器官(PDO)化学敏感性与临床反应相关联。
在一项多机构临床试验(n = 21)中,从治疗前活检样本中建立PDO,并在一个高容量胰腺切除中心从临床标本中建立PDO(n = 74,其中48个为治疗前样本)。通过加权最近邻分析,将PDO对标准治疗化疗药物(药物类型)的体外化学敏感性与潜在的临床相关治疗方案进行匹配。然后根据这一指标,比较治疗匹配良好与匹配不佳的患者的临床结果。
我们的函数将91%的PDO与标准治疗方案相匹配(9%为全耐药)。与新辅助治疗方案匹配不佳的PDO在34%的病例中本可与另一种方案相匹配。接受与药物类型匹配良好的新辅助化疗的患者,其CA 19-9反应有所改善(匹配良好时降至正常的比例为60%,匹配不佳时为29%,P<0.05),且淋巴结降期情况更好(匹配不佳后N0比例为33%,匹配良好后为69%,P<0.05)。接受匹配良好的新辅助化疗和辅助化疗的患者,其无复发生存期和总生存期均有所改善(中位无复发生存期:匹配不佳为8.5个月,匹配良好为15.9个月,P<0.05;中位总生存期:分别为19.5个月和30.3个月,P<0.05)。
体外PDO药物分型可为PDAC治疗选择提供参考。我们证明,对于接受与PDO化学敏感性匹配良好的治疗方案的患者,包括生存期在内的治疗结果有所改善。随后使用PDO药物分型匹配的前瞻性研究可能会改善肿瘤治疗结果,并通过避免使用预计无效的治疗方法来提高生活质量。