• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用因果框架在网络中发现有影响力的主体。

Finding influential subjects in a network using a causal framework.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):3715-3727. doi: 10.1111/biom.13841. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13841
PMID:36788358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10423748/
Abstract

Researchers across a wide array of disciplines are interested in finding the most influential subjects in a network. In a network setting, intervention effects and health outcomes can spill over from one node to another through network ties, and influential subjects are expected to have a greater impact than others. For this reason, network research in public health has attempted to maximize health and behavioral changes by intervening on a subset of influential subjects. Although influence is often defined only implicitly in most of the literature, the operative notion of influence is inherently causal in many cases: influential subjects are those we should intervene on to achieve the greatest overall effect across the entire network. In this work, we define a causal notion of influence using potential outcomes. We review existing influence measures, such as node centrality, that largely rely on the particular features of the network structure and/or on certain diffusion models that predict the pattern of information or diseases spreads through network ties. We provide simulation studies to demonstrate when popular centrality measures can agree with our causal measure of influence. As an illustrative example, we apply several popular centrality measures to the HIV risk network in the Transmission Reduction Intervention Project and demonstrate the assumptions under which each centrality can represent the causal influence of each participant in the study.

摘要

研究人员在广泛的学科领域都对发现网络中最具影响力的主体感兴趣。在网络环境中,干预效果和健康结果可以通过网络联系从一个节点传播到另一个节点,而有影响力的主体预计会产生比其他主体更大的影响。出于这个原因,公共卫生领域的网络研究试图通过对有影响力的主体的子集进行干预,来最大程度地实现健康和行为改变。尽管在大多数文献中,影响通常只是隐含定义的,但在许多情况下,影响的操作性概念本质上是因果关系的:有影响力的主体是我们应该干预的对象,以在整个网络中实现最大的整体效果。在这项工作中,我们使用潜在结果来定义因果影响的概念。我们回顾了现有的影响衡量指标,如节点中心性,这些指标主要依赖于网络结构的特定特征和/或某些扩散模型,这些模型预测信息或疾病通过网络联系传播的模式。我们提供模拟研究结果,以展示在哪些情况下流行的中心性衡量指标可以与我们的因果影响衡量指标一致。作为一个说明性的例子,我们将几种流行的中心性衡量指标应用于 HIV 风险网络,在 Transmission Reduction Intervention Project 中,并展示了每种中心性可以代表每个参与者的因果影响的假设。

相似文献

1
Finding influential subjects in a network using a causal framework.利用因果框架在网络中发现有影响力的主体。
Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):3715-3727. doi: 10.1111/biom.13841. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
A new causal centrality measure reveals the prominent role of subcortical structures in the causal architecture of the extended default mode network.一种新的因果中心度度量揭示了皮质下结构在扩展默认模式网络因果结构中的突出作用。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Nov;228(8):1917-1941. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02697-w. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Node centrality measures are a poor substitute for causal inference.节点中心度测度是因果推断的糟糕替代品。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 2;9(1):6846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43033-9.
4
Computing Influential Nodes Using the Nearest Neighborhood Trust Value and PageRank in Complex Networks.利用复杂网络中的最近邻信任值和PageRank算法计算有影响力的节点
Entropy (Basel). 2022 May 16;24(5):704. doi: 10.3390/e24050704.
5
The Influence of a School Social Network Intervention on Adolescent's Health Behaviors: A Gender-Specific Agent-Based Model.学校社交网络干预对青少年健康行为的影响:基于代理的性别特定模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;10:861743. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861743. eCollection 2022.
6
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
7
On the validity of the centrality hypothesis in cross-sectional between-subject networks of psychopathology.横断面个体间精神病理学网络中心性假设的有效性。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 12;18(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01740-5.
8
Identifying Influence Agents That Promote Physical Activity Through the Simulation of Social Network Interventions: Agent-Based Modeling Study.通过模拟社交网络干预来识别促进身体活动的影响因素:基于主体的建模研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 5;21(8):e12914. doi: 10.2196/12914.
9
Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.迈向复杂网络中心性度量验证方法学。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e90283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090283. eCollection 2014.
10
SpreadRank: A Novel Approach for Identifying Influential Spreaders in Complex Networks.传播排名:一种在复杂网络中识别有影响力传播者的新方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Apr 10;25(4):637. doi: 10.3390/e25040637.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating Causal Effects of HIV Prevention Interventions with Interference in Network-based Studies among People Who Inject Drugs.在基于网络的注射吸毒者研究中估计具有干扰性的HIV预防干预措施的因果效应。
Ann Appl Stat. 2023 Sep;17(3):2165-2191. doi: 10.1214/22-aoas1713. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
Auto-G-Computation of Causal Effects on a Network.网络上因果效应的自动G计算
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(534):833-844. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1811098. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
3
Causal inference, social networks and chain graphs.因果推断、社交网络与链形图。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2020 Oct;183(4):1659-1676. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12594. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
4
Strategic Players for Identifying Optimal Social Network Intervention Subjects.确定最佳社交网络干预对象的战略参与者。
Soc Networks. 2018 Oct;55:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Injection drug network characteristics as a predictor of injection behaviour.注射毒品网络特征作为注射行为的预测指标。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e173. doi: 10.1017/S095026881900061X.
6
A network intervention that locates and intervenes with recently HIV-infected persons: The Transmission Reduction Intervention Project (TRIP).一项针对新近感染 HIV 人群进行定位和干预的网络干预措施:传播减少干预项目(TRIP)。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 5;6:38100. doi: 10.1038/srep38100.
7
Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools.冲突气候的转变:一项针对56所学校的社交网络实验
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):566-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514483113. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
Social Network Assessments and Interventions for Health Behavior Change: A Critical Review.用于健康行为改变的社交网络评估与干预:一项批判性综述。
Behav Med. 2015;41(3):90-7. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2015.1034645.
9
Epidemiology. Social factors in epidemiology.流行病学。流行病学中的社会因素。
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):47-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1244492.
10
The diffusion of microfinance.小额信贷的传播。
Science. 2013 Jul 26;341(6144):1236498. doi: 10.1126/science.1236498.