• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准备具有重叠和非重叠反应集的任务中的听觉任务转换。

Preparing auditory task switching in a task with overlapping and non-overlapping response sets.

机构信息

Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Department for Developmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, 60323, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2228-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01796-x. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-023-01796-x
PMID:36790482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10457221/
Abstract

We used a variant of cued auditory task switching to investigate task preparation and its relation to response-set overlap. Previous studies found increased interference with overlapping response sets across tasks relative to non-overlapping motor response sets. In the present experiments, participants classified either pitch or loudness of a simple tone as low or high, hence, both tasks were constructed around common underlying integrated semantic categories ranging from low to high. Manual responses overlapped in both category and modality for both tasks in Experiment 1A, whereas each task was related to a specific response category and response modality (manual vs. vocal) in Experiment 1B. Focusing on the manual responses in both experiments, the data showed that non-overlapping response sets (Experiment 1B) resulted in a decreased congruency effect, suggesting reduced response-based crosstalk and thus better task shielding, but at the same time switch costs were increased, suggesting less efficient switching between task sets. Moreover, varying preparation time (cue-stimulus interval, CSI) showed that long CSI led to better performance overall. Our results thus suggest that when non-overlapping response sets share common semantic categories across tasks, there is no general benefit over overlapping response sets.

摘要

我们使用一种提示听觉任务转换的变体来研究任务准备及其与反应集重叠的关系。以前的研究发现,相对于非重叠的运动反应集,在任务之间具有重叠的反应集时会出现更大的干扰。在本实验中,参与者将简单音调的音高或响度分类为低或高,因此,两个任务都是围绕从低到高的共同潜在综合语义类别构建的。在实验 1A 中,两个任务的手动反应在类别和模态上都重叠,而在实验 1B 中,每个任务都与特定的反应类别和反应模态(手动与声音)相关。在这两个实验中都专注于手动反应,数据表明非重叠的反应集(实验 1B)导致了一致性效应的降低,这表明基于反应的串扰减少,因此任务屏蔽更好,但同时转换成本增加,表明在任务集之间的切换效率较低。此外,变化的准备时间(提示-刺激间隔,CSI)表明长 CSI 总体上导致更好的性能。因此,我们的结果表明,当非重叠的反应集在任务之间共享共同的语义类别时,重叠的反应集并没有带来普遍的好处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d833/10457221/9aa7483b5218/426_2023_1796_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d833/10457221/6fcca53766ec/426_2023_1796_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d833/10457221/c600af8c92a8/426_2023_1796_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d833/10457221/9aa7483b5218/426_2023_1796_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d833/10457221/6fcca53766ec/426_2023_1796_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d833/10457221/c600af8c92a8/426_2023_1796_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d833/10457221/9aa7483b5218/426_2023_1796_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Preparing auditory task switching in a task with overlapping and non-overlapping response sets.准备具有重叠和非重叠反应集的任务中的听觉任务转换。
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2228-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01796-x. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
The role of response set overlap for flexibility and cognitive control in auditory multitasking.反应集重叠在听觉多重任务中的灵活性和认知控制中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Mar;223:103499. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103499. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.线索提示任务切换中跨通道注意准备与通道兼容性的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):955-965. doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.任务切换中模态特异性对串扰的影响:来自使用双峰刺激的模态兼容性的证据。
Psychol Res. 2016 Nov;80(6):935-943. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0700-y. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.触觉刺激增强任务切换中模态兼容性的效应。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):276-84. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000291. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
6
Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.考察对任务切换成本和反应重复效应的绑定作用:任务切换中线索模态和刺激模态的变化
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1632-1643. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01931-0.
7
Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.通过最小化任务间串扰来消除双重任务成本:模态和特征配对的作用。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
8
Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.任务切换中模态映射的新特征:模态兼容性要求刺激模态和反应模态层面都具有变异性。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):121-133. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0875-5. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
9
How conceptual overlap and modality pairings affect task-switching and mixing costs.概念重叠和模态配对如何影响任务转换和混合成本。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1020-1032. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0932-0. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
10
Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.任务转换中的中央交叉对话:来自输入-输出模态兼容性操纵的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):1075-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019695.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparatory Switches of Auditory Spatial and Non-Spatial Attention Among Simultaneous Voices.同时发声时听觉空间和非空间注意的预备性转换
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 6;8(1):7. doi: 10.5334/joc.412. eCollection 2025.
2
Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context.跨模态情境下一致性序列效应的视觉优势
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1504068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504068. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring "phasic" vs. "tonic" accounts of the effect of switch probability on the auditory attention switch cost.

本文引用的文献

1
Are some effector systems harder to switch to? In search of cost asymmetries when switching between manual, vocal, and oculomotor tasks.是否有些效应器系统更难切换?在手动、语音和眼动任务之间切换时寻找成本不对称性。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1563-1577. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01287-1. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
The role of response set overlap for flexibility and cognitive control in auditory multitasking.反应集重叠在听觉多重任务中的灵活性和认知控制中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Mar;223:103499. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103499. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval.
探究切换概率对听觉注意切换代价影响的“相位性”与“紧张性”解释。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1061-1076. doi: 10.1177/17470218241256361. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Does preparation help to switch auditory attention between simultaneous voices: Effects of switch probability and prevalence of conflict.准备是否有助于在同时出现的声音之间切换听觉注意:转换概率和冲突普遍性的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):750-767. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02841-y. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
听觉任务切换中的反应重复:空间反应距离和反应-刺激间隔的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Aug;199:102875. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102875. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Cognitive control in the cocktail party: Preparing selective attention to dichotically presented voices supports distractor suppression.鸡尾酒会中的认知控制:对双耳呈现声音的选择性注意准备有助于抑制干扰物。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):727-737. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1620-x.
5
Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.人类多重任务中的认知结构、灵活性和可塑性——双任务和任务转换研究的综合综述。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583. doi: 10.1037/bul0000144. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Intentional switching of auditory attention between long and short sequential tone patterns.在长序列和短序列音调模式之间有意切换听觉注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1132-1146. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1298-5.
7
The role of response modalities in cognitive task representations.反应方式在认知任务表征中的作用。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2011;7:31-8. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0085-1. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
8
Control and interference in task switching--a review.任务转换的控制与干扰——综述。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):849-74. doi: 10.1037/a0019842.
9
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
10
The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition.重叠反应集对任务抑制的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):603-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193298.