• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究切换概率对听觉注意切换代价影响的“相位性”与“紧张性”解释。

Exploring "phasic" vs. "tonic" accounts of the effect of switch probability on the auditory attention switch cost.

作者信息

Strivens Amy, Koch Iring, Lavric Aureliu

机构信息

Institute for Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1061-1076. doi: 10.1177/17470218241256361. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1177/17470218241256361
PMID:38724482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12095880/
Abstract

Task-switching experiments have shown that the "switch cost" (poorer performance for task switches than for repetitions) is smaller when the probability of a switch is high (e.g., 0.75) than when it is low (e.g., 0.25). Some theoretical accounts explain this effect in terms of top-down control deployed in advance of the task cue ("pre-cue reconfiguration"). We tested such accounts by manipulating the time available before the onset of the cue (the response-cue interval, RCI), reasoning that top-down pre-cue reconfiguration requires time and therefore its effect should increase with RCI. Participants heard a man and a woman simultaneously speaking number words and categorised the number (< 5 vs. > 5) spoken by the voice specified by a pictorial gender-related cue presented at an RCI of 100 ms or 2,200 ms. The target voice switched with a probability of 0.25 or 0.75 (in separate sessions). In Experiment 1, RTs revealed a large effect of switch probability on the switch cost in the short RCI, which did not increase in the long RCI. Errors hinted at such an increase, but it did not receive clear statistical support and was disconfirmed by a direct and better powered replication in Experiment 2, which fully confirmed the RT pattern from Experiment 1. Thus, the effect of switch probability on the switch cost required little/no time following the response to emerge-it was already at full magnitude at a short RCI-challenging accounts that assume "phasic" deployment of top-down task-set control in advance of the cue.

摘要

任务切换实验表明,当切换概率较高(例如0.75)时,“切换成本”(任务切换时的表现比重复时差)比切换概率较低(例如0.25)时要小。一些理论解释认为,这种效应是由于在任务提示之前预先部署的自上而下的控制(“预提示重新配置”)。我们通过操纵提示开始前的可用时间(反应-提示间隔,RCI)来测试这些解释,推断自上而下的预提示重新配置需要时间,因此其效果应随RCI增加。参与者同时听到一男一女说出数字单词,并对由与性别相关的图片提示指定的声音说出的数字(<5与>5)进行分类,提示在100毫秒或2200毫秒的RCI时呈现。目标声音以0.25或0.75的概率切换(在不同的实验环节中)。在实验1中,反应时间显示,在短RCI中,切换概率对切换成本有很大影响,而在长RCI中并未增加。错误提示有这种增加,但未得到明确的统计支持,并且在实验2中通过直接且更有力的重复实验被否定,实验2完全证实了实验1中的反应时间模式。因此,切换概率对切换成本的影响在反应之后几乎不需要/不需要时间就会出现——在短RCI时就已经达到最大程度——这对那些假设在提示之前“阶段性”部署自上而下任务集控制的解释提出了挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/8fc3b821ebc2/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/d014a168744c/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/0755690a329f/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/557a57700030/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/8e36387c0ae3/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/8fc3b821ebc2/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/d014a168744c/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/0755690a329f/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/557a57700030/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/8e36387c0ae3/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e2/12095880/8fc3b821ebc2/10.1177_17470218241256361-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring "phasic" vs. "tonic" accounts of the effect of switch probability on the auditory attention switch cost.探究切换概率对听觉注意切换代价影响的“相位性”与“紧张性”解释。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1061-1076. doi: 10.1177/17470218241256361. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.探索听觉任务切换中注意力设置的时间消散情况。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):73-80. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0571-5.
3
A new account of the effect of probability on task switching: ERP evidence following the manipulation of switch probability, cue informativeness and predictability.概率对任务转换影响的新解释:在操纵转换概率、线索信息量和可预测性后,ERP 证据。
Biol Psychol. 2012 Oct;91(2):245-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
4
The persisting influence of unattended auditory information: Negative priming in intentional auditory attention switching.未被注意的听觉信息的持续影响:有意听觉注意转换中的负启动效应
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1835-1846. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01909-y.
5
Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability.听觉注意力转换的有意准备:明确提示与顺序转换可预测性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1382-1395. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1344867. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
6
Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.双耳分听中的有意注意转换:探究非空间和空间选择的效率
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):2010-24. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.898079. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
7
Does preparation help to switch auditory attention between simultaneous voices: Effects of switch probability and prevalence of conflict.准备是否有助于在同时出现的声音之间切换听觉注意:转换概率和冲突普遍性的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):750-767. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02841-y. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
Age-related Electrophysical Correlates of Cross-modal Attention Switching.跨模态注意转换的年龄相关电生理关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jan 2;37(1):43-62. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02248.
9
Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention.鸡尾酒会中的切换:探索听觉选择性注意的有意控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1140-7. doi: 10.1037/a0022189.
10
Does preparation generate the cost of task switching? A recipe for a switch cost after cue-only trials.准备工作会产生任务切换成本吗?仅提示试验后产生切换成本的一个原因。
Psychol Res. 2025 Mar 24;89(2):72. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02107-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of preparation on binding between spatial and non-spatial features of voices in a multitalker setting.在多说话者环境中,准备工作对语音空间和非空间特征之间绑定的影响。
Psychol Res. 2025 Apr 15;89(2):88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02103-6.
2
Preparatory Switches of Auditory Spatial and Non-Spatial Attention Among Simultaneous Voices.同时发声时听觉空间和非空间注意的预备性转换
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 6;8(1):7. doi: 10.5334/joc.412. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Does preparation help to switch auditory attention between simultaneous voices: Effects of switch probability and prevalence of conflict.准备是否有助于在同时出现的声音之间切换听觉注意:转换概率和冲突普遍性的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):750-767. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02841-y. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
2
Preparing auditory task switching in a task with overlapping and non-overlapping response sets.准备具有重叠和非重叠反应集的任务中的听觉任务转换。
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2228-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01796-x. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
No need to choose: Independent regulation of cognitive stability and flexibility challenges the stability-flexibility trade-off.
无需取舍:认知稳定性和灵活性的独立调节挑战了稳定性-灵活性权衡。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3009-3027. doi: 10.1037/xge0001241. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Neural Dynamics of Context-sensitive Adjustments in Cognitive Flexibility.神经动力学视角下认知灵活性的情境敏感性调整。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Feb 1;34(3):480-494. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01813.
5
Serial or parallel proactive control of components of task-set? A task-switching investigation with concurrent EEG and eye-tracking.任务集成分的串行还是并行主动控制?同时使用 EEG 和眼动追踪的任务转换研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107984. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107984. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
Rationalizing constraints on the capacity for cognitive control.理性化认知控制能力的约束条件。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Sep;25(9):757-775. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch.基于两耳分听的在线耳机听力筛查测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1551-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01514-0. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.情境适应性认知灵活性是由任务和项目水平的学习驱动的。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Aug;20(4):757-782. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00801-9.
9
Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching.在任务转换中分离基于预期和基于经验的控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Feb;46(2):131-154. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000704.
10
The persisting influence of unattended auditory information: Negative priming in intentional auditory attention switching.未被注意的听觉信息的持续影响:有意听觉注意转换中的负启动效应
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1835-1846. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01909-y.