Brooker Charlie, Sirdifield Coral, Parkhouse Thomas
Centre for Sociology and Criminology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Eur J Probat. 2022 Dec;14(3):179-203. doi: 10.1177/20662203221140646. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
There is a need to improve a) identification and monitoring of people with mental illness on probation and b) understanding of the impact of interventions on mental health outcomes for the probation population. If data were routinely collected using validated screening tools and shared between agencies, this could inform practice and commissioning decisions, and ultimately it could improve health outcomes for people under supervision. The literature was reviewed to identify brief screening tools and outcome measures that have been used in prevalence and outcome studies conducted with adults on probation in Europe. This paper shares findings from the UK-based studies in which 20 brief screening tools and measures were identified. Recommendations are made based on this literature regarding suitable tools for use in probation to routinely identify a need for contact with mental health and/or substance misuse services and to measure change in mental health outcomes.
a) 对缓刑期内患有精神疾病的人员的识别和监测；b) 了解干预措施对缓刑人群心理健康结果的影响。如果使用经过验证的筛查工具定期收集数据并在各机构之间共享，这可以为实践和委托决策提供信息，最终改善受监管人员的健康结果。对文献进行了综述，以确定在欧洲对缓刑期成年人进行的患病率和结果研究中使用过的简短筛查工具和结果指标。本文分享了基于英国研究的结果，其中识别出了20种简短筛查工具和指标。基于这些文献，就适用于缓刑的工具提出了建议，以便常规识别与心理健康和/或药物滥用服务接触的需求，并衡量心理健康结果的变化。
