Department of Psychology, University of Bath.
Department of Psychology, Durham University.
J Sex Res. 2024 Feb;61(2):299-312. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2176811. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Sex differences in mate preferences are ubiquitous, having been evidenced across generations and cultures. Their prevalence and persistence have compellingly placed them in the evolutionarily adaptive context of sexual selection. However, the psycho-biological mechanisms contributing to their generation and maintenance remain poorly understood. As such a mechanism, sexual attraction is assumed to guide interest, desire, and the affinity toward specific partner features. However, whether sexual attraction can indeed explain sex differences in partner preferences has not been explicitly tested. To better understand how sex and sexual attraction shape mate preferences in humans we assessed how partner preferences differed across the spectrum of sexual attraction in a sample of 479 individuals that identified as asexual, gray-sexual, demisexual or allosexual. We further tested whether romantic attraction predicted preference profiles better than sexual attraction. Our results show that sexual attraction accounts for highly replicable sex differences in mate preferences for high social status and financial prospects, conscientiousness, and intelligence; however, it does not account for the enhanced preference for physical attractiveness expressed by men, which persists even in individuals with low sexual attraction. Instead, sex differences in physical attractiveness preference are better explained by the degree of romantic attraction. Furthermore, effects of sexual attraction on sex differences in partner preferences were grounded in current rather than previous experiences of sexual attraction. Taken together, the results support the idea that contemporary sex differences in partner preferences are maintained by several psycho-biological mechanisms that evolved in conjunction, including not only sexual but also romantic attraction.
性别在配偶偏好上的差异是普遍存在的,已经在不同的世代和文化中得到了证明。它们的普遍性和持久性有力地将它们置于性选择的进化适应背景下。然而,导致它们产生和维持的心理生物学机制仍未得到很好的理解。作为一种机制,性吸引力被认为可以指导兴趣、欲望和对特定伴侣特征的亲和力。然而,性吸引力是否真的可以解释配偶偏好上的性别差异,尚未得到明确的检验。为了更好地理解性和性吸引力如何塑造人类的配偶偏好,我们评估了在一个由 479 名自认为无性恋、灰色性恋、半性恋或全性恋的个体样本中,性吸引力在性吸引谱上的差异如何影响配偶偏好。我们进一步测试了浪漫吸引力是否比性吸引力更能预测偏好模式。我们的研究结果表明,性吸引力可以解释配偶偏好中高度可复制的性别差异,包括对高社会地位和经济前景、尽责性和智力的偏好;然而,它并不能解释男性对身体吸引力的增强偏好,即使在性吸引力较低的个体中,这种偏好仍然存在。相反,身体吸引力偏好的性别差异更好地由浪漫吸引力的程度来解释。此外,性吸引力对配偶偏好的性别差异的影响是基于当前而不是以前的性吸引力经验。总之,这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即当代配偶偏好的性别差异是由几种心理生物学机制共同维持的,这些机制不仅包括性吸引力,还包括浪漫吸引力。