• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用数据驱动方法开发和评估系统性红斑狼疮表型算法。

Using a data-driven approach for the development and evaluation of phenotype algorithms for systemic lupus erythematosus.

机构信息

Janssen Research and Development Epidemiology, Titusville, New Jersey, United States of America.

Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI), New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281929. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0281929
PMID:36795690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9934349/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown origin. The objective of this research was to develop phenotype algorithms for SLE suitable for use in epidemiological studies using empirical evidence from observational databases.

METHODS

We used a process for empirically determining and evaluating phenotype algorithms for health conditions to be analyzed in observational research. The process started with a literature search to discover prior algorithms used for SLE. We then used a set of Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) open-source tools to refine and validate the algorithms. These included tools to discover codes for SLE that may have been missed in prior studies and to determine possible low specificity and index date misclassification in algorithms for correction.

RESULTS

We developed four algorithms using our process: two algorithms for prevalent SLE and two for incident SLE. The algorithms for both incident and prevalent cases are comprised of a more specific version and a more sensitive version. Each of the algorithms corrects for possible index date misclassification. After validation, we found the highest positive predictive value estimate for the prevalent, specific algorithm (89%). The highest sensitivity estimate was found for the sensitive, prevalent algorithm (77%).

CONCLUSION

We developed phenotype algorithms for SLE using a data-driven approach. The four final algorithms may be used directly in observational studies. The validation of these algorithms provides researchers an added measure of confidence that the algorithms are selecting subjects correctly and allows for the application of quantitative bias analysis.

摘要

背景

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种病因不明的慢性自身免疫性疾病。本研究旨在开发适用于流行病学研究的 SLE 表型算法,该算法基于观察性数据库中的经验证据。

方法

我们使用一种针对观察性研究中分析的健康状况的经验确定和评估表型算法的过程。该过程首先从文献检索开始,以发现先前用于 SLE 的算法。然后,我们使用一组观察性健康数据科学和信息学(OHDSI)开源工具来改进和验证这些算法。这些工具包括用于发现先前研究中可能遗漏的 SLE 代码的工具,以及用于确定算法中可能存在的低特异性和索引日期分类错误的工具。

结果

我们使用我们的过程开发了四个算法:两个用于现患 SLE 的算法和两个用于新发病例 SLE 的算法。现患和新发病例的算法都包括更具体的版本和更敏感的版本。每个算法都对可能的索引日期分类错误进行了校正。经过验证,我们发现最常见的现患、特定算法的阳性预测值估计值最高(89%)。最敏感的算法是敏感的现患算法(77%)。

结论

我们使用数据驱动的方法开发了 SLE 表型算法。这四个最终的算法可直接用于观察性研究。这些算法的验证为研究人员提供了一个额外的信心指标,即算法能够正确选择研究对象,并允许进行定量偏倚分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/9934349/0c3dd98f6455/pone.0281929.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/9934349/cca13af742dc/pone.0281929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/9934349/96e378afb674/pone.0281929.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/9934349/0c3dd98f6455/pone.0281929.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/9934349/cca13af742dc/pone.0281929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/9934349/96e378afb674/pone.0281929.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/9934349/0c3dd98f6455/pone.0281929.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a data-driven approach for the development and evaluation of phenotype algorithms for systemic lupus erythematosus.运用数据驱动方法开发和评估系统性红斑狼疮表型算法。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281929. eCollection 2023.
2
Developing Electronic Health Record Algorithms That Accurately Identify Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.开发能够准确识别系统性红斑狼疮患者的电子健康记录算法。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 May;69(5):687-693. doi: 10.1002/acr.22989. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
A systematic review of validated methods for identifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using administrative or claims data.基于行政或索赔数据识别系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的已验证方法的系统评价。
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 30;31 Suppl 10:K62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.104.
4
Identifying lupus patients in electronic health records: Development and validation of machine learning algorithms and application of rule-based algorithms.在电子健康记录中识别狼疮患者:机器学习算法的开发和验证以及基于规则算法的应用。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Aug;49(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Phenotype Algorithms to Identify Hidradenitis Suppurativa Using Real-World Data: Development and Validation Study.利用真实世界数据识别化脓性汗腺炎的表型算法:开发与验证研究
JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Nov 30;5(4):e38783. doi: 10.2196/38783.
6
Case definitions in Swedish register data to identify systemic lupus erythematosus.瑞典登记数据中用于识别系统性红斑狼疮的病例定义。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 4;6(1):e007769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007769.
7
PheValuator 2.0: Methodological improvements for the PheValuator approach to semi-automated phenotype algorithm evaluation.PheValuator 2.0:用于半自动化表型算法评估的 PheValuator 方法的方法学改进。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Nov;135:104177. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104177. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
8
Early Clinical Features in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Can They Be Used to Achieve Earlier Diagnosis? A Risk Prediction Model.系统性红斑狼疮的早期临床特征:能否用于实现早期诊断?一种风险预测模型。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jun;69(6):833-841. doi: 10.1002/acr.23021. Epub 2017 May 8.
9
Assessment of strategies for identifying diagnosed cases of systemic lupus erythematosus through self-report.通过自我报告识别系统性红斑狼疮确诊病例的策略评估。
Lupus. 2003;12(10):754-9. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu460oa.
10
Development and validation of a new algorithm for attribution of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus.一种用于系统性红斑狼疮神经精神事件归因的新算法的开发与验证
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 May;54(5):891-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu384. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
CohortDiagnostics: Phenotype evaluation across a network of observational data sources using population-level characterization.队列诊断:使用人群水平特征在观察性数据源网络中进行表型评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0310634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310634. eCollection 2025.
2
Validating claims-based algorithms for a systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis in Medicare data for informed use of the Lupus Index: a tool for geospatial research.验证医疗保险数据中基于索赔的系统性红斑狼疮诊断算法,以便明智地使用狼疮指数:一种用于地理空间研究的工具。
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Oct 14;11(2):e001329. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001329.

本文引用的文献

1
PheValuator 2.0: Methodological improvements for the PheValuator approach to semi-automated phenotype algorithm evaluation.PheValuator 2.0:用于半自动化表型算法评估的 PheValuator 方法的方法学改进。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Nov;135:104177. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104177. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
PheValuator: Development and evaluation of a phenotype algorithm evaluator.PheValuator:表型算法评估器的开发与评估。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Sep;97:103258. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103258. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
3
Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: an update.
系统性红斑狼疮的流行病学:更新。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018 Mar;30(2):144-150. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000480.
4
Word2Vec inversion and traditional text classifiers for phenotyping lupus.用于狼疮表型分析的词向量反演和传统文本分类器
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0518-1.
5
Chronic low back pain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence and predictors of back muscle strength and its correlation with disability.系统性红斑狼疮患者的慢性下腰痛:背部肌肉力量的患病率、预测因素及其与残疾的相关性
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 2017 Sep-Oct;57(5):438-444. doi: 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
6
Developing Electronic Health Record Algorithms That Accurately Identify Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.开发能够准确识别系统性红斑狼疮患者的电子健康记录算法。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 May;69(5):687-693. doi: 10.1002/acr.22989. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Case definitions in Swedish register data to identify systemic lupus erythematosus.瑞典登记数据中用于识别系统性红斑狼疮的病例定义。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 4;6(1):e007769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007769.
8
Good practices for quantitative bias analysis.定量偏倚分析的良好实践。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1969-85. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu149. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Identification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in administrative healthcare databases.在行政医疗保健数据库中识别系统性红斑狼疮患者。
Lupus. 2014 Nov;23(13):1377-82. doi: 10.1177/0961203314543917. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
10
Cardiac manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮的心脏表现。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Feb;40(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2013.10.003.