• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《职业抑郁量表在巴西的验证:一项针对1612名公务员的研究》

Validation of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Brazil: A study of 1612 civil servants.

作者信息

Bianchi Renzo, Cavalcante Danísio Calixto, Queirós Cristina, Santos Blezi Daiana Menezes, Verkuilen Jay, Schonfeld Irvin Sam

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; National Institute of Social Security, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2023 Apr;167:111194. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111194. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111194
PMID:36801658
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Occupational Depression Inventory (ODI) assesses work-attributed depressive symptoms. The ODI has demonstrated robust psychometric and structural properties. To date, the instrument has been validated in English, French, and Spanish. This study examined the psychometric and structural properties of the ODI's Brazilian-Portuguese version.

METHODS

The study involved 1612 civil servants employed in Brazil (M = 44, SD = 9; 60% female). The study was conducted online across all Brazilian states.

RESULTS

Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) bifactor analysis indicated that the ODI meets the requirements for essential unidimensionality. The general factor accounted for 91% of the common variance extracted. We found measurement invariance to hold across sexes and age groups. Consistent with these findings, the ODI showed strong scalability (H = 0.67). The instrument's total score accurately ranked respondents on the latent dimension underlying the measure. Furthermore, the ODI exhibited excellent total-score reliability (e.g., McDonald's ω = 0.93). Occupational depression correlated negatively with work engagement and each of its components (vigor, dedication, and absorption), speaking to the ODI's criterion validity. Finally, the ODI helped clarify the issue of burnout-depression overlap. Relying on ESEM confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we found burnout's components to correlate more strongly with occupational depression than with each other. Using a higher-order ESEM-within-CFA framework, we found a correlation of 0.95 between burnout and occupational depression.

CONCLUSION

The ODI displays robust psychometric and structural properties within the Brazilian context. The ODI constitutes a valuable resource for occupational health specialists and may help advance research on job-related distress.

摘要

目的

职业抑郁量表(ODI)用于评估工作所致的抑郁症状。ODI已展现出强大的心理测量和结构特性。迄今为止,该工具已在英语、法语和西班牙语版本中得到验证。本研究考察了ODI巴西葡萄牙语版本的心理测量和结构特性。

方法

该研究纳入了1612名巴西公务员(M = 44,标准差 = 9;60%为女性)。研究在巴西所有州在线开展。

结果

探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)双因素分析表明,ODI符合基本单维性的要求。一般因素解释了提取的共同方差的91%。我们发现测量不变性在性别和年龄组间成立。与这些发现一致,ODI显示出很强的可扩展性(H = 0.67)。该工具的总分在测量所基于的潜在维度上准确地对受访者进行了排名。此外,ODI表现出出色的总分信度(例如,麦克唐纳ω系数 = 0.93)。职业抑郁与工作投入及其各个组成部分(活力、奉献和专注)呈负相关,这表明了ODI的效标效度。最后,ODI有助于厘清倦怠与抑郁重叠的问题。基于ESEM验证性因素分析(CFA),我们发现倦怠的各个组成部分与职业抑郁的相关性比它们彼此之间的相关性更强。使用CFA框架内的高阶ESEM,我们发现倦怠与职业抑郁之间的相关性为0.95。

结论

在巴西背景下,ODI展现出强大的心理测量和结构特性。ODI是职业健康专家的宝贵资源,可能有助于推进与工作相关困扰的研究。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Brazil: A study of 1612 civil servants.《职业抑郁量表在巴西的验证:一项针对1612名公务员的研究》
J Psychosom Res. 2023 Apr;167:111194. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111194. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Validation of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Sweden.瑞典职业性抑郁量表的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):1505. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16417-w.
3
Italian version of the Occupational Depression Inventory: Validity, reliability, and associations with health, economic, and work-life characteristics.《职业性抑郁量表》意大利语版本:效度、信度及其与健康、经济和工作生活特征的关联
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 22;13:1061293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1061293. eCollection 2022.
4
Towards a new approach to job-related distress: A three-sample study of the Occupational Depression Inventory.迈向一种新的与工作相关困扰的处理方法:职业性抑郁量表的三样本研究。
Stress Health. 2023 Feb;39(1):137-153. doi: 10.1002/smi.3177. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
Validation and measurement invariance of the Occupational Depression Inventory in South Africa.南非职业抑郁症量表的验证和测量不变性。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261271. eCollection 2021.
6
A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine.波兰和乌克兰职业抑郁量表的验证研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 22;14(1):4403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54995-w.
7
The Occupational Depression Inventory: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.职业性抑郁量表:临床医生和流行病学家的新工具。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Nov;138:110249. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110249. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
Are Australian teachers burned-out or depressed? A confirmatory factor analytic study involving the Occupational Depression Inventory.澳大利亚教师是否倦怠或抑郁?一项涉及职业倦怠量表的验证性因子分析研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Jun;157:110783. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110783. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
9
Do burnout and depressive symptoms form a single syndrome? Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling bifactor analysis.职业倦怠和抑郁症状是否构成单一综合征?验证性因素分析和探索性结构方程建模双因素分析。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Feb 4;131:109954. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109954.
10
Is the PHQ-9 a unidimensional measure of depression? A 58,272-participant study.PHQ-9 是否是衡量抑郁的单维指标?一项涉及 58272 名参与者的研究。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jun;34(6):595-603. doi: 10.1037/pas0001124. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Casting a Wider Net: On the Utilitarian Nature of Burnout Assessment in the Workplace.扩大范围:论职场倦怠评估的功利主义本质。
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Jun;48(2):238-241. doi: 10.1177/01632787241259032. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine.波兰和乌克兰职业抑郁量表的验证研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 22;14(1):4403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54995-w.