• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用儿童社区融入指数衡量社区中残疾儿童的健康融入情况:一项可行性研究。

Application of the child community health inclusion index for measuring health inclusion of children with disabilities in the community: a feasibility study.

机构信息

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 3500 Blv Decarie, Room 439, Montreal, QC, H4A3J5, Canada.

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03884-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-023-03884-8
PMID:36803575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9939852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation in the community is a fundamental human right for children with disabilities and is a key component of their health and development. Inclusive communities can enable children with disabilities to participate fully and effectively. The Child Community Health Inclusion Index (CHILD-CHII) is a comprehensive assessment tool developed to examine the extent to which community environments foster healthy, active living for children with disabilities.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of applying the CHILD-CHII measurement tool across different community settings.

METHODS

Participants recruited through maximal representation, and purposeful sampling from four community sectors (Health, Education, Public Spaces, Community Organizations) applied the tool on their affiliated community facility. Feasibility was examined by assessing length, difficulty, clarity, and value for measuring inclusion; each rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants provided comments for each indicator through the questionnaire and a follow-up interview.

RESULTS

Of the 12 participants, 92% indicated that the tool was 'long' or 'much too long'; 66% indicated that the tool was clear; 58% indicated that the tool was 'valuable' or 'very valuable'. No clear consensus was obtained for the level of difficulty. Participants provided comments for each indicator.

CONCLUSION

Although the length of the tool was regarded as long, it was seen to be comprehensive and valuable for stakeholders in addressing the inclusion of children with disabilities in the community. The perceived value and the evaluators' knowledge, familiarity, and access to information can facilitate use of the CHILD-CHII. Further refinement and psychometric testing will be conducted.

摘要

背景

参与社区活动是残疾儿童的一项基本人权,也是他们健康和发展的关键组成部分。包容性社区可以使残疾儿童充分、有效地参与。儿童社区健康包容指数(CHILD-CHII)是一种全面的评估工具,旨在考察社区环境促进残疾儿童健康、积极生活的程度。

目的

评估在不同社区环境中应用 CHILD-CHII 测量工具的可行性。

方法

通过最大代表性和有目的的抽样,从四个社区部门(卫生、教育、公共空间、社区组织)招募参与者,在其附属社区设施上应用该工具。通过评估衡量包容性的长度、难度、清晰度和价值来评估可行性;每个指标都在 5 点李克特量表上进行评分。参与者通过问卷和后续访谈对每个指标提供了意见。

结果

在 12 名参与者中,92%的人表示该工具“太长”或“太长了”;66%的人表示该工具清晰易懂;58%的人表示该工具“有价值”或“非常有价值”。对于难度水平,没有达成明确的共识。参与者对每个指标都提供了意见。

结论

尽管工具的长度被认为很长,但它被认为是全面的,对利益相关者解决残疾儿童在社区中的包容问题具有价值。感知到的价值以及评估者的知识、熟悉程度和获取信息的能力可以促进 CHILD-CHII 的使用。还将进行进一步的细化和心理测量测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e4/9940428/0e3e9bce2462/12887_2023_3884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e4/9940428/0e3e9bce2462/12887_2023_3884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e4/9940428/0e3e9bce2462/12887_2023_3884_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of the child community health inclusion index for measuring health inclusion of children with disabilities in the community: a feasibility study.应用儿童社区融入指数衡量社区中残疾儿童的健康融入情况:一项可行性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03884-8.
2
Content development of the Child Community Health Inclusion Index: An evaluation tool for measuring inclusion of children with disabilities in the community.
Child Care Health Dev. 2023 Jan;49(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/cch.13004. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
Development of a community health inclusion index: an evaluation tool for improving inclusion of people with disabilities in community health initiatives.社区健康包容指数的制定:一种用于改善残疾人融入社区健康倡议的评估工具。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 13;15:1050. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2381-2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Characteristics of Inclusive Web-Based Leisure Activities for Children With Disabilities: Qualitative Descriptive Study.残疾儿童基于网络的包容性休闲活动的特点:定性描述性研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 May 4;6:e38236. doi: 10.2196/38236.
6
Identifying environmental barriers to participation: Usability of a health-literacy informed problem-identification approach for parents of young children with developmental disabilities.识别参与的环境障碍:一种基于健康素养的问题识别方法对发育障碍幼儿家长的可用性。
Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Mar;44(2):249-259. doi: 10.1111/cch.12542. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
7
Intervention research addressing environmental risk threatening young children with disabilities in developing countries: a systematic review.干预研究应对发展中国家有残疾的幼儿面临的环境风险:系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Aug;41(17):1987-2005. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1509142. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
8
Using a logic model to evaluate the Kids Together early education inclusion program for children with disabilities and additional needs.运用逻辑模型评估针对残疾儿童和有其他需求儿童的“儿童在一起”早期教育融合项目。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Apr;61:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review.环境对残疾儿童和青少年参与的影响:范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Sep;35(19):1589-98. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.748840. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
10
Initial Development and Evaluation of the My Family's Accessibility and Community Engagement (MyFACE) Tool for Families of Children With Disabilities.《为残疾儿童家庭开发和评估的家庭无障碍与社区参与工具》。
Am J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul 1;76(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.048009.

本文引用的文献

1
Content development of the Child Community Health Inclusion Index: An evaluation tool for measuring inclusion of children with disabilities in the community.
Child Care Health Dev. 2023 Jan;49(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/cch.13004. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of a Preschool Outcome Measure: An Interview Study with Speech-Language Pathologists.实施学前评估工具的障碍和促进因素:与言语治疗师的访谈研究。
J Commun Disord. 2022 Jan-Feb;95:106166. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106166. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
3
Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies.非随机对照预试验和可行性研究报告指南
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Oct 6;5:114. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0499-1. eCollection 2019.
4
Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries.发达国家和发展中国家在使用神经学结果测量方法方面的促进因素和障碍。
Physiother Res Int. 2019 Jan;24(1):e1756. doi: 10.1002/pri.1756. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews.在提供健康相关服务的组织中实施患者报告结局指标的促进因素和障碍:一项综述的系统评价
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Oct 3;2:46. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0072-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review.第三部门组织(非营利组织)评估其服务的障碍和促进因素有哪些?系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0681-1.
7
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:随机试点和可行性试验的扩展》
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
8
Development of a community health inclusion index: an evaluation tool for improving inclusion of people with disabilities in community health initiatives.社区健康包容指数的制定:一种用于改善残疾人融入社区健康倡议的评估工具。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 13;15:1050. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2381-2.
9
Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.电子和纸质患者报告结局测量的等效性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1949-61. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0937-3. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
10
The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research.专业人员运用患者报告结局测量信息以提高医疗质量的经验:一项定性研究的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):508-18. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524. Epub 2014 Feb 6.