• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用时间交易和离散选择实验评估 EQ 健康与幸福感短量表:一项可行性研究。

Valuing the EQ Health and Wellbeing Short Using Time Trade-Off and a Discrete Choice Experiment: A Feasibility Study.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):1073-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.008
PMID:36805577
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The EQ Health and Wellbeing Short (EQ-HWB-S) is a new generic measure that covers health and wellbeing developed for use in economic evaluation in health and social care. The aim was to test the feasibility of using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) based on an international protocol to derive utilities for the EQ-HWB-S and to generate a pilot value set.

METHODS

A representative UK general population was recruited. Online videoconference interviews were undertaken where cTTO and DCE tasks were administered using EuroQol Portable Valuation Technology. Quality control (QC) was used to assess interviewers' performance. Data were modeled using Tobit, probit, and hybrid models. Feasibility was assessed based on the distribution of data, participants, and reports of understanding from the interviewer, QC and modeling results.

RESULTS

cTTO and DCE data were available for 520 participants. Demographic characteristics were broadly representative of the UK general population. Interviewers met QC requirements. cTTO values ranged between -1 to 1 with increasing disutility associated with more severe states. Participants understood the tasks and the EQ-HWB-S states; and the interviewers reported high levels of understanding and engagement. The hybrid Tobit heteroscedastic model was selected for the pilot value set with values ranging from -0.384 to 1. Pain, mobility, daily activities, and sad/depressed had the largest disutilities, followed by loneliness, anxiety, exhaustion, control, and cognition in the selected model.

CONCLUSIONS

EQ-HWB-S can be valued using cTTO and DCE. Further methodological work is recommended to develop a valuation protocol specific to the EQ-HWB-S.

摘要

目的

EQ 健康与幸福感简短量表(EQ-HWB-S)是一种新的涵盖健康和幸福感的通用衡量标准,专为健康和社会保健中的经济评估而开发。目的是测试使用基于国际协议的复合时间权衡(cTTO)和离散选择实验(DCE)来为 EQ-HWB-S 衍生效用并生成试点值集的可行性。

方法

招募了具有代表性的英国普通人群。通过 EuroQol 便携式估值技术在线视频会议访谈进行 cTTO 和 DCE 任务。使用质量控制(QC)评估访谈者的表现。使用 Tobit、probit 和混合模型对数据进行建模。基于数据、参与者的分布以及访谈者、QC 和建模结果的理解报告来评估可行性。

结果

cTTO 和 DCE 数据可用于 520 名参与者。人口统计学特征广泛代表了英国普通人群。访谈者符合 QC 要求。cTTO 值范围在-1 到 1 之间,与更严重的状态相关的效用损失增加。参与者理解任务和 EQ-HWB-S 状态;访谈者报告了高水平的理解和参与度。选择混合 Tobit 异方差模型作为试点值集,值范围从-0.384 到 1。疼痛、移动性、日常活动和悲伤/抑郁的效用损失最大,其次是孤独、焦虑、疲惫、控制和认知。

结论

可以使用 cTTO 和 DCE 对 EQ-HWB-S 进行估值。建议进一步开展方法学工作,为 EQ-HWB-S 开发特定的估值方案。

相似文献

1
Valuing the EQ Health and Wellbeing Short Using Time Trade-Off and a Discrete Choice Experiment: A Feasibility Study.使用时间交易和离散选择实验评估 EQ 健康与幸福感短量表:一项可行性研究。
Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):1073-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
2
An EQ-5D-5L value set for Italy using videoconferencing interviews and feasibility of a new mode of administration.意大利使用视频会议访谈构建 EQ-5D-5L 值集以及一种新管理模式的可行性。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114519. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114519. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.美国使用国际协议对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态进行评估。
Value Health. 2019 Aug;22(8):931-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 May 25.
4
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
Valuation of EQ-5D-5L in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A National Representative Study.沙特阿拉伯王国 EQ-5D-5L 的评估:一项全国代表性研究。
Value Health. 2024 May;27(5):552-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
6
Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.秘鲁的 EQ-5D-5L 评估:时间权衡和离散选择实验的直接比较。
Value Health. 2020 Jul;23(7):880-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
7
Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.针对德国人群采用综合时间权衡法对EQ-5D-5L进行估值——一项探索性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0617-9.
8
The EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study in Egypt.埃及 EQ-5D-5L 估值研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):433-447. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01100-y. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
9
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.基于DCE和/或TTO数据的价值集比较:日本EQ-5D-5L健康状态评分
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
10
Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: An Exploratory Study.使用时间权衡值估算 EQ-5D-Y 值集:一项探索性研究。
Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):968-973. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring and Valuing Health Using EuroQol Instruments: New Developments 2025 and Beyond.使用欧洲生活质量量表工具测量和评估健康状况:2025年及以后的新进展
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00989-2.
2
The Psychometric Performance of Generic Preference-Based Measures in Informal Carers: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies.通用偏好性测量工具在非正式照料者中的心理测量性能:验证研究的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01509-9.
3
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.
健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
4
How well do participants understand the questions asked in the Online Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) approach? A cognitive debrief of the EQ-HWB-S (EQ Health and Wellbeing Short version) valuation.参与者对在线个人效用函数(OPUF)方法中所提问题的理解程度如何?对EQ-HWB-S(EQ健康与幸福简版)估值的认知情况汇报。
Qual Life Res. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03989-w.
5
Estimating a preference-based index for patients with myasthenia gravis from the MGQoL-6D measure.根据重症肌无力患者生活质量量表-6维度(MGQoL-6D)测量结果估算基于偏好的指数。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 20;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02370-2.
6
Test-retest reliability of the Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) approach for valuing the EQ-HWB-S.用于评估EQ-HWB-S的个人效用函数在线诱导法(OPUF)的重测信度。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 8. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01769-4.
7
Associations between financial toxicity, health-related quality of life, and well-being in Indonesian patients with breast cancer.印度尼西亚乳腺癌患者的经济毒性、健康相关生活质量和幸福感之间的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03925-y.
8
EQ-5D-5L or EQ-HWB-S: Which is the Better Instrument for Capturing Spillover Effects in Parental Carers of Children with COVID-19?EQ-5D-5L还是EQ-HWB-S:哪种工具更适合捕捉新冠病毒感染儿童的父母照料者的溢出效应?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May;43(5):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01473-4. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Appropriateness of the EQ-HWB for Use in Residential Aged Care: A Proxy Perspective.适用于养老院的 EQ-HWB 问卷:代理视角。
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):673-683. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00715-5. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
10
Understanding caregiver burden from multiple perspectives: dyadic agreement between caregiver and care recipient.从多个角度理解照顾者负担:照顾者和被照顾者之间的双重一致性。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):1719-1734. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03643-x. Epub 2024 Apr 17.