Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jun;29(6):710-713. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Although phage therapy has been in existence for a century, a recent resurgence in interest has occurred because of the continued emergence of antimicrobial resistance and the rising use of indwelling medical devices, resulting in biofilm-associated infections, for which conventional antibiotics are of limited use. Despite this, the clinical successes have been inconsistent because of multiple reasons, including (1) the narrow host range of phages, (2) challenges with concentrating phages at the site of infection, (3) development of resistance of bacteria to phages and (4) immune neutralization. Microbiologic assays have the potential to help guide the course of clinical therapy and improve outcomes. Methods developed decades ago remain the mainstay of phage diagnostics and recently, newer diagnostics are closing the gap needed to further advance clinical phage therapy.
To review the current state of clinical phage microbiology and identify gaps.
A PubMed search was performed using the terms "phage microbiology", "phage susceptibility test", "phage host range", "phage biofilm", and "phage therapeutic monitoring".
Phage susceptibility testing, biofilm assays, phage-antibiotic combination testing, therapeutic drug monitoring, and immune monitoring assays are the current foundation for clinical phage diagnostics. Standardization of these assays and better understanding as to if and how they should be used in terms of clinical management of patients receiving phage therapy is needed.
A substantial gap between in vitro studies and in vivo outcomes indicates that further work is needed in phage pharmacokinetics to accurately assay phage particles at the site of infection; recapitulate in vivo biofilm; capture the complex interactions between phages and antibiotics, phages and their target bacteria, among phages in a cocktail, and with the superhost immune system.
尽管噬菌体疗法已经存在了一个世纪,但由于抗菌药物耐药性的持续出现以及留置医疗设备的使用增加,导致生物膜相关感染,而传统抗生素对此类感染的疗效有限,因此最近人们对噬菌体疗法的兴趣再次高涨。尽管如此,由于多种原因,临床疗效并不一致,包括(1)噬菌体的宿主范围狭窄,(2)在感染部位浓缩噬菌体存在挑战,(3)细菌对噬菌体产生耐药性,以及(4)免疫中和。微生物学检测有潜力帮助指导临床治疗过程并改善结果。几十年前开发的方法仍然是噬菌体诊断的主要方法,最近,新的诊断方法正在缩小差距,以进一步推进临床噬菌体治疗。
回顾临床噬菌体微生物学的现状并确定差距。
使用术语“噬菌体微生物学”、“噬菌体药敏试验”、“噬菌体宿主范围”、“噬菌体生物膜”和“噬菌体治疗监测”在 PubMed 上进行了搜索。
噬菌体药敏试验、生物膜检测、噬菌体-抗生素联合检测、治疗药物监测和免疫监测检测是目前临床噬菌体诊断的基础。需要对这些检测进行标准化,并更好地了解它们是否以及如何在接受噬菌体治疗的患者的临床管理方面使用。
体外研究与体内结果之间存在很大差距,这表明需要在噬菌体药代动力学方面进一步研究,以准确检测感染部位的噬菌体颗粒;重现体内生物膜;捕捉噬菌体与抗生素、噬菌体与其靶细菌之间的复杂相互作用,以及鸡尾酒中噬菌体之间以及与超级宿主免疫系统之间的复杂相互作用。